Jump to content

Talk:Mykola Tomenko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scientist

[edit]

One comment on a small detail. That he has a Ph D doesn't qualify him for a scientists cat. He needs to establish notability as a scientist as he did as a Politician. Would he have been just a scientist, he would hardly qualify for a Wikipedia article based purely on his schientific notability. Not every Ph. D. has an article in Wikipedia. The fact that he holds a degree is worthy to be mentioned of course. But he rightfully belongs only to Ukrainian politicans cat as I see it. It is the same as to add category:Beekeeping to the Yushchenko article simply because beekeeping is VAYu's hobby. --Irpen 02:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History is a science; political science (politology) is a science. And, Tomenko is well established professional in politology and history. He was appointed as a decan of Political Science Department of Kyiv Mohyla Academy. Also, "Томенко є автором підручника "Основи теорії і політики" і книг "Історія української Конституції" та "Абетки української політики". [1]. His current publications are available form the website of his institute. Taking into account all of this, while Tomenko is not a rocket scientists, I think he still qualifies for a scientist category. KPbIC 04:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, a head of department settles it for now. It was not clear from the initial version of the article as the article failed to mention what makes him a scientist and UP article I read about him was rather sarcastic about him being a "scientific guy". As long as his scientific credentials are established within the article itself, as they are now, I am fine with the scientist cat. --Irpen 04:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mykola Tomenko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]