Talk:Marking blue

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Marking blue be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Engineer's blue

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to remain separate. See Talk:Engineer's blue#Proposed merge. --Kierkkadon^{talk/contribs} 18:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is'nt this the same as engineer's blue. mabey they should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbtjacob (talk • contribs) 23:01, 29 June 2006

No, marking blue is made by mixng prussian blue with methanol, while engineer's blue is made with prussian blue and oil. Marking blue dries, while engineer's blue doesn't. They are also used for different purposes. --71.227.190.111 00:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also no, but see the merge discussion at Engineers' blue.-- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.