Talk:List of trading companies

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2014. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

This is a meaningless list as the inclusion criteria are vague. I can't see any useful benefit from having this article on Wikipedia and the description does not add anything either. There are many categories that are better suited to grouping companies together, on balance I think this article should be deleted, but have just tagged it for now. --Sargdub (talk) 02:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meets guidelines

I find it to be a meaningful list that provides a useful navigation aid per WP:LISTPURP. Furthermore, it fully qualifies for an article per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Trading companies and subcategories therein. I've replaced the notability template with a ref improve template. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability / Inclusion part 2

It does not appear that this list has been maintained since the AFD, but I'll post here in case someone is still watching.

Inclusion criteria still seems a little vague, despite NA1000's excellent re-write of the lede. Are we really intending to include all brokerage/forex firms, such as Teletrade and IFC markets?
While I respect Doncram's position on redlinks in the AFD, I would propose an adherence to removing redlinks here. I'm delighted to work with passers by if there is strong sourcing, but this is going attract promotional entries otherwise.
There seems to be an attempt to break this out into sub-cats (by country, by commodity). Would anyone mind if we finished that one way or the other? Maybe completing the conversion to "by country" and just noting the primary commodities next to the entry? Kuru (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]