Talk:Lauren Jenkins/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 18:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Overall, pretty well written. Just needs a couple more things

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Made a couple adjustments there
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I think the article needs a section on her artistry. It looks like her projects haven't been reviewed much, but surely there's something to say about her voice type, song choices, and overall critical reception of her work. Also, is there more to say about the independent EP?
I considered talking about her artistry at first but I wasn't sure if there was enough information on that as most of it came from album reviews. I have now found information which talks about what you mentioned from the sources in this article and from others as well, but I am a bit busy at the moment so I will add it tomorrow if that is okay. For the independent EP, American Songwriter details the writing process but I'm not sure if that is relevant for her career. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think those things are relevant enough to add regarding the EP. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TenPoundHammer: I have added the information about her artistry and the independent EP. Let me know if it looks alright. Sebbirrrr (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
When this article was submitted to GAN it did not have a photo. I see that one has since been acquired.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Putting this on hold to address the one issue brought up above. Once that is addressed, this should be good.

@TenPoundHammer: Many thanks for reviewing the article! I've replied to your concern. Regards, Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebbirrrr: I think you have successfully addressed all my issues, so I am passing this now. Congrats Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]