Talk:Komtar/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: PenangLion (talk · contribs) 04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! I'll be reviewing this article. 141Pr -\contribs/- 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article seems to be stable, I don't see anything wrong with it.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Initial comments
[edit]Article looks good at a glance, I'll have a closer review in a bit. 141Pr -\contribs/- 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey...are there any further comments for this review? gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Praseodymium-141, I will be closing this review as you have not made any comments for over three weeks. I will be handing the process over to another editor who is interested in reviewing the article. Cheers, gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 04:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- There is some sandwiching going on in the construction section - there are just a lot of images in general. Consider removing some or grouping them together.