Jump to content

Talk:Kaz II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Kaz towel.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kaz towel.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Kaz II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First 2 are good, 3rd archives a dead link. I'll mark the checked flag to true, delete the dead link, and later on I'll come back and try to find an equivalent link to add.Pleonic (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kaz II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaz II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relative lack of information

[edit]

This is an old article, but I noticed some information missing that could flesh it out a bit.

  • The article lacks much background information on any of the three men. Employment records, financial status, and personal lives. Pre-existing medical conditions for Batten are mentioned (and he was apparently not in good health), but no such mention for the Tunstead brothers.
  • Lack of information on the background of the catamaran. Batten owned the ship for about a year, and a previous owner is mentioned in the article. How old was the catamaran, and where was it constructed?
  • The journey was apparently planned for Batten and his wife, with the Tunsteads as late additions. However Mrs. Batten was not among the crew during the final voyage. Why did she not join her husband, as originally planned?
  • The journey had to be postponed for a day due to user errors with the GPS. It is unclear from the text how experienced the crew were in using and programming GPS.
  • The video taken by the crew depicts "land masses", which were later used by authorities to estimate their location at the time of filming. However the Wikipedia article does not name any of these land masses, nor does it give an estimate of their location. Dimadick (talk) 11:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There was no mention of examination of the torn sails. Probable cause, condition of, etc.. With the torn sails looking to be the only problem with the boat, why no forensic examination on them for substances on them, unusual tear patterns, or any other examinations?Timehunter 99 (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Experience of the crew

[edit]

Hello everyone. Have just made some updates and fixes to the article, plus added some information about the crews experience under the "Crew" section. From everything I have read it appears the crew had very little bluewater or ocean sailing experience, which I believe is a significant issue. Happy to discuss Ilenart626 (talk) 06:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kaz_II&oldid=1207933957"