Talk:Kanishtha Dhankar
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kanishtha Dhankar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright violation image removed (again)
[edit]I had to remove the image since it was uploaded several times to commons and there is no permission for this picture [1]
Groetjes Neozoon 20:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
From Jhajjar district
[edit]I removed a section that looked off-topic and POV:
That India's newest beauty queen comes from the place which has the dubious distinction of practising gender-based discrimination in worst form, is indeed an irony. Kanishtha Dhankar, Miss India World 2011, hails from hails from Jhajjar district in Haryana that shot to infamy for having the worst sex ratio in the country at 774 girls per 1,000 boys in the 2011 census. "Daughters can also be achievers, my achievement will surely help initiate a new thought process in the state against gender discrimination", said Kanishtha, recently in the Capital to promote a new product range of NoMarks, a leading cosmetic brand.[5]
There is a referenced quotation here, but the first two sentences are completely POV. The unspoken implication is that the ratio of boys to girls is a form of discrimination. Now, there is a reliably sourced statement to this effect in the Jhajjar district article, but it doesn't belong here. In any case, the claim to "irony" is original research/personal opinion. StAnselm (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Beauty Pageants articles
- Mid-importance Beauty Pageants articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class fashion articles
- Mid-importance fashion articles