Talk:Joseph Maraachli case

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Maraachli case article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this article here? besides propaganda?

how do we nominate this for deletion? 50.9.109.170 (talk) 03:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability NYyankees51 (talk) 04:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and how is this dead child notable? besides pro-lifers propaganda?

50.9.109.170 (talk) 08:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that articles should only be prodded if they are clearly non-notable and their deletion is likely to be uncontested (except maybe by the creator). This article certainly does not fall into that category. Take to AfD if you feel it is not notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The general guidelines for notability are given at WP:GNG with more detail for events like this at WP:EVENT. To nominate an article for deletion you should follow the instructions at WP:AFD. I very much doubt you will manage to gain consensus for deletion, given the depth of media coverage that this case generated. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

little help here. I like to nominate this propaganda article for deletion

can someone do that please or point me to the right direction? 50.9.109.170 (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Catfish Jim's note above. --Kenatipo ^speak! 04:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you start the procedure, as explained at WP:AFD, I will complete the parts that IPs can't do. However, considering the sustained coverage in the news in two countries, as demonstrated by the references given, it's very unlikely that the discussion will result in a consensus to delete. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Maraachli case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]