This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
I'm not really convinced, at least not by the draft as written. The citation counts, while good for pure math, are not really exceptional, and I don't think good enough to make a strong case for WP:PROF#C1. One generally expects higher citation numbers for more senior academics (because they've had longer for the citations to accumulate). The books look like standard texts on standard subjects; there's one non-routine review of the discrete math book at [1] and one routine review (not counting towards notability) at Zbl0952.00002. The analysis book has two routine reviews at MR1466701 and Zbl0872.00002. The issue is that, while it's not quite true that MR and zbl review every mathematics publication, they review such a large fraction of them that it is not any kind of distinction to be reviewed by them. So the case for WP:AUTHOR is borderline at best. And all we know of his education and career is his current affiliation. It's possible to find his dissertation title and location, but that's still not a lot of information. I'm not saying he's non-notable; he seems to have had a successful and respectable career, and there could well be more to it that I'm missing. But the draft doesn't make the case and my web searches didn't find enough to convince me. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein: I appreciate your thorough review. I was slightly surprised that Truss doesn't seem to be a recipient of any academic awards or fellowships which would have pushed this otherwise borderline case past the notability threshold in my mind. TJMSmith (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
