This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:13, December 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
A fact from Jake Adelstein appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Jake Adelstein was the first American to work as a Japanese language reporter for a Japanese newspaper?
Is it odd to only me that most of this guy's "career" section is filled with sentences of what the person "claims" or "says" they did? Not only that, but one of his "claims" was actually put forth as a "Did you know...?" fact? We don't know that he was the first American citizen to work for a Japanese newspaper as a Japanese reporter, only that he claims he did.Clickonthewhatnow (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW now, that is incorrect. IIRC Adelstein has made no such claim (moot anyway, since he's not cited in the article for that claim); and the claim has been made by secondary sources. If one is arguing that Adelstein's publisher's claim is being lazily repeated by other sources, at least provide some support. bridies (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The edit summary used in my last revert isn't correct -- it seems Goto's liver transplant is the issue specifically. Adelstein made those claims himself; this is his article; he's not being potentially libeled. As for Goto, his article makes the same claims, regards his liver and being a gangster more broadly. These are supported by reliable sources, by people other than Adelstein (which shouldn't matter: if the issue is Adelstein's alleged self-promotion, why is libel an issue? If the issue is potentially libeling Goto, why is a claim made by a journalist in a book published in print by a third-party, international publisher a poor source?). Anyone can feel free to import them if he really feels the need; I'm editing from a kindle and am not dealing with markup. bridies (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added a reference to a guardian article, for a start. It covers the Goto incident in detail, mentions Adelstein in that context - hence demonstrating it's relevance to this article - was not written by Adelstein, and contains plenty of detail not covered in Adelstein's work (hence, is further research and is not simply repeating Adelstein's claims. bridies (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On the question of Goto supposedly having entered the US by illicit means, this is simply not what the article says. It says that Adelstein believed this at the time, it's properly attributed to him, and a necessary part of the info on the case. Given that Goto transpired to have turned supergrass on the stuff he was involved in, it's also not far wide of the mark. Secondly, yes, the info that Adelstein covered crime beginning in a particular year is sourced to him: so what? Primary sources are fine for their own articles (and in fact this is not some SPS of Adelstein's, but is covered in multiple edited publications), and in this case there is no possible libel, controversy, or self-promotion. It's basic, relevant biographical information and is taking up all of a few words. The rationale for removing it was first some myopic claim of irrelevance, then that it was not sourced (plainly ridiculous) and now that it is sourced to Adelstein. Clear case of IDONTLIKEIT. bridies (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And adding "wrongly" to the former claim is OR editorialising and adding WP:WEASEL words, as is adding redundant "claims" to every other sentence. The extent to which he was wrong is clear from the rest of the article. bridies (talk) 21:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've read the whole thing and to be honest, I don't think he was wrong at all. Reading through your comments and revision history, it appears as if you're just a typical trouble maker. Your information is poorly gathered, referenced and very controversial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.33.62 (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just stating the facts. I recommend you do the same while you're on Wikipedia. It will make you look less foolish.
Yawn. Provide some evidence for these "facts"? Trolling random pages and editors, and apparently stalking my edit history, makes you look both foolish and bizarre. bridies (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
