Jump to content

Talk:Henri Lefebvre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reception and Criticisms section

[edit]

Perhaps the Reception and Criticisms sub-section under The Production of Space should be elevated to a full section. This could include Castells's structuralist criticisms on Lefebvre's thesis of urban society, as well as other aspects of his reception. I am thinking here for instance of Soja's efforts to situate Lefebvre within post-modern geography, and the response this has evoked from other scholars like Goonwardena, Schmid, and Elden. Also worth mentioning would probably be the delayed and fragmented way Lefebvre's oeuvre has been adopted by anglophone scholars, and especially geographers (according to Elden and various other Lefebvre experts). Finally, there is the accusations by Neil Smith, Alex Loftus, and other geographers and political ecologists of a dualistic treatment of nature and society by Lefebvre, though John Bellamy Foster and others have countered that Lefebvre's handling of nature-society was dialectical, and that accusations of dualism reflect a monist rather than dialectical mindset. I can provide some of this text if everyone is in agreement with the proposal to elevate the Reception and Criticisms section. GeoMarxBMN (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

Strange as it may seem the bibliography misses 2 or 3 of his most important works.--Radh (talk) 12:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Radh: Further, most commentaries on Lefebvre's bibliography note that he wrote somewhere near seventy books and more than 100 articles; the bibliography in this article does not show his entire book oeuvre, and shows none of his articles. Perhaps the best way to organize this is to create a separate bibliography page that is comprehensive. Joeyvandernaald (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

under production of space

[edit]

natural space and 'absolute space' are not synonymous for Lefevbre... I think this should be changed

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Henri Lefebvre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Henri Lefebvre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]