Talk:Gesticulation in Italian

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 May 2019 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs).

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a video clip or video clips be included in this article to improve its quality.

Proposed merge with Italian Hand Gestures

These two articles are obviously about the same subject. I like the title of this page better, personally. We should also consider Hand gestures in Italian _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:48, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposal, given the overlap in scope; I agree that Gesticulation in Italian is the better title, and broader too. I did wonder whether the line of argument was that such gestures were cultural (by Ilatlians) rather than linguistic (in Italian), but think that it might be more culturally sensitive to keep the titles as they are. Klbrain (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and merged content into this article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect citation on number [9]

The article claims there are 250 different hand gestures used in Italian, but the reference it uses has nothing to do with Italian or hand gestures despite the misleading title. Is this potentially vandalism? The whole paragraph was already poorly written to begin with. 206.253.64.230 (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]