Talk:Gamer (2009 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Budget

There's NO WAY this movie cost $12.5M, that's absurd for a movie with this much special effects, my guess would be closer to $125M. Found an article on gerardbutler.net that said $50M, which is atleast remotely plausible, but no real source otherwise. http://www.gerardbutler.net/news/Print.php?NewsID=4158 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormwern (talk • contribs) 19:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Headlines

Gerard Butler - Game Interview —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

its not called citizen game that was an april fools joke —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.202.169 (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as anyone knows, it is now called "Citizen Game". They made the announcement before April 1st, and if you look at the Lionsgate site, they still refer to it by its new name. There have been a few interviews which have hinted that a joke may have been played, but they still hint that the title has changed to something other than simply "Game". Guess we'll just have to wait and see what further announcements are forthcoming.magnius (talk) 07:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Camera

I don't want to get into petty arguments by changing the page, but it seems unlikely that Gamer was the second film after Guerilla to use the Red camera. (1) The film Argentine also used the Red and was shot at the same time as Guerilla, and (2) the film Knowing (also shot on Red) has already come and gone from the theaters. Of course the article was written in 2007, so it's possible they were in production before Knowing, but when is a movie considered to be made; when it shoots or when it shows? - Rapscallion (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A film is considered made when filming is complete. The order in which films are finally released has no bearing on the order in which they were produced, so if Gamer used the Red camera before Knowing then it comes first. magnius (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remake of Running Man?

I don't think that should be included in the first part of the article for this movie, since there's no link to any source and the movies are only vaguely related in their premises. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.137.211 (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't neccesarily say that it's related, but perhaps it should be mentioned, in some manner, that this is actually a fairly common premise in dystopian films and novels -- IE, the emergance of ultraviolent sports or gladitorial combat as mainstream entertainment, sometimes employing the disenfranchised, criminals, or deathrow inmates in competition for wealth or freedom, ultimately results in the lead character attempting to overthrow the corporate mastermind(s). 66.220.139.140 (talk) 05:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed disagree to agree...since the statement after the word was in "aggrement" with the overall negative critical assessment of the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.46.89 (talk) 02:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis Section re-edit

I took out some questionable words (like 'somehow' and 'perhaps') from the summary and added some links to words that will allow readers to better understand the circumstances at hand. 76.237.88.71 (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kable

Why does a search for 'Kable' redirect to this? I was looking for the legal case in Australia, this seems far less important and only has the vaguest connection the the term 'kable' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.206.174 (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

I don't understand the plot. It's phrased in a very confusing manner. 80.99.221.200 (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gamer (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gamer (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://uk.movies.ign.com/objects/907/907044.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100313045718/http://gamerthemovie.com/ to http://gamerthemovie.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://movieblog.ugo.com/movies/gamer-poster

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Butler's character name is incorrect despite revisions from "vandalism"

Not sure how this made it through but Butler's character is known as Kable, not Thoink, as the cast list suggests. Can't edit it since, you know, new account. Hopefully somebody else fixes it. Bandedcat10 (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]