Talk:Frank Knight

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I believe that this is almost entirely plagiarized from http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/knight.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baffledexpert (talk • contribs) 02:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Information was used (or should we say disseminated) from public domain New School webpages, source is mentioned at bottom. Plagiarised is very heavy wording. Please read New School webpages about their policy for use of their information.Robertsch55 (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copied text

I was about to delete most of the article because it appeared to be obvious plagiarism copied from the New School web site. However, as pointed out above, permission is granted to use the text. Specifically, "As far as using the material contained here, just about every use is granted, except that of using the material on this website to make money."[1] However, the source of the copied text is not listed under the references section as it should be. Instead, it is only listed as an external link. When you copy an entire article into Wikipedia, it's a bit more than just an external link. I am going to move the New School article to the "references" section. --JHP (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that aside from as allowed in non-free content policy and guideline, Wikipedia has never accepted material that is licensed to restrict commercial reuse. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://homepage.newschool.edu/het/profiles/knight.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that little progress has been made on integrating Knightian uncertainty into economics is wrong.

Most notably Jimmy Savage's book The Foundations of Statistics makes progress.

Also Amscombe-Aumann stuff.

See Itzhak Gilboa's excellent book The Theory of Decision under Uncertainty for a summary.

I hope someone better informed than I and much better informed than the page's current author updates this page soon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.107.20 (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taught Ronald Coase?

Hello. In this article it says that Ronald Coase was a student of Frank Knight but i've been unable to confirm it anywhere else on the Internet. Has anyone got a source for that? But i have read that he had four students which later on received nobelprize but from what i've heard the fourth was Paul Samuelson and not Ronald Coase. Benjaminjuhlin (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coase said Knight was a major influence on him, so Coase is his "student" (but he did not take K's courses) see Ross B. Emmett (2010). The Elgar Companion to The Chicago School of Economics. Elgar. p. 238. Rjensen (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf75CpWaQ_Q&feature=relmfu - you're still for freedom of speach? :D :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.255.208.145 (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080429204107/http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/knight.htm to http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/knight.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impact on Knightian uncertainty

The text states: "While most economists now acknowledge Knight's distinction between risk and uncertainty, the distinction has not resulted in much theoretical modelling or empirical work."

In my eyes, this if far from true. There is a lot of literature on the topic. A google scholar search gives more than 30.000 hits on "Knightian uncertainty". There is also a wikipedia entry on that which should probably be linked.

Would be happy to discuss - or propose a text. Tschmidtfreiburg (talk) 08:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]