Talk:Ferrigno Glacier

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

So the editors discussing this didn't appear to check the sources; they are not duplicates at all but are located in different places and are different things according to the USGSFalconjh (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate orphans, no less. Let's at least consolidate them. I don't really care which name is used for the article. -- Donald Albury 12:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This is just silly. My (weak) preference is to locate at this article (the glacier) simply because it is a term more people are familiar with; the other article sounds like an unusual phenomenon, which it is not. 98.82.24.210 (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This should already have been done. Krenakarore ^TK 16:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Check the geographic sources, one is south of New Zealand the other is south of South America, on opposite sides of the continent from each other; they aren't duplicates at all. Falconjh (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.