Talk:FCC v. Pacifica Foundation

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Legislation

I don't see why the 2003 bill designed to outlaw the dirty words was included. The bill didn't pass, and there are thousands of bills introduced every year which don't pass -- we don't put every piece of proposed legislation on a Wikipedia page, do we? Additionally, the link to the bill is broken. If no one objects, I'll delete the legislation section in a few days. If someone objects, well, let's discuss. :-) Ztrawhcs 17:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-functioning links

The EFF and Findlaw links to the text of the judgment are non-functional. 58.8.107.132 (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify second circuit court decison

What Second Circuit Appeals Court freedom of speech case or cases in 2010 is or are referenced by the "second circuit court" link? I found: Weintraub v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 27 January 2010. If this is correct, then maybe linking to the case might be more useful than linking to the court jurisdiction the case was decited in. Gauzeandchess (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Docket Numbers

Docket Numbers e.g. 77-528 should be used Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]