Talk:Doves as symbols
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
New Page
[edit]Nice new page! I just tidied up a little bit of the formatting and added a new catagory! LookingYourBest 14:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Royal Air Force
[edit]Hello again! I've just edited the RAF section of the page as it had a couple of inaccuracies in it. The crest is only that of one wing within the Air Force, the symbol of communications within the RAF is actually a clenched fist with 6 'sparks' eminating from it. Also the RAF's symbol is actually an Osprey, thus I didn't think the memorial photo had much to do with the article on a whole! Keep up the good work! LookingYourBest 11:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't want to get into a revert war about this Barbara, but the memorial image is in no way relevant to the article. The description of the memorial clearly states that it is an eagle on a globe and the picture doesn't have a dove anywhere in it. The RAF's symbol is that of an osprey. That said, if you can provide another explaination of why it should be in the article, please let me know! Cheers!
- LookingYourBest 14:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hachiman
[edit]Doves are the symbolic animal of Hachiman, the Shinto god of war. I'm afraid I don't know much more about him than that (I wonder whether he has influence from the Hindu Hanuman or whether it's just a similarity in names and roles, but that's OT here) -- so I'm not sure whether it would be worth it to just add a single line like that. ExOttoyuhr (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:TCWCrest.gif
[edit]The image File:TCWCrest.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not to worry, it's got one now! --LookingYourBest (talk) 18:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Jewish and Christian symbolism
[edit]I have made a couple of deletions under this heading. It is a common misconception that the dove and olive branch in the story of Noah represent peace, but neither the dove nor the olive branch are mentioned anywhere in either the Hebrew Bible or the New Testament in connection with peace. The symbolism of the dove in the Hebrew Bible (e.g. Psalms, but elsewhere too) is varied and complex. In Matthew's Gospel the dove is a simile of the Holy Spirit that descended on Jesus during his baptism. The olive branch as a peace symbol is pagan, associated with the goddess Eirene or Pax. This symbol was combined with the dove in early Christian art in the Roman Catacombs alongside explicit references to peace (ειρήνή or pace). This is discussed in more detail, with references, under Peace symbols I do wish people would do a bit of research before writing Wikipedia articles from the first thing that comes into their heads! Marshall46 (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doves as symbols. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325222538/http://faculty.maryvillecollege.edu/scripts/as_web4.exe?Command=Doc&File=Crossan.ask&DocID=1012654 to http://faculty.maryvillecollege.edu/scripts/as_web4.exe?Command=Doc&File=Crossan.ask&DocID=1012654
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)