Talk:Cryogenic energy storage

Tag for multiple issues

I've added further secondary references. Do others think that these are sufficient to address the tagged concerns over primary sources and other viewpoints? Hallucegenia (talk) 14:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no, as it reads a bit promo right now, with 2/4 refs being the companies.

I undid your rename, see my edit summary for details (ie WP:PRECISE), plus the scope of the BBC article includes the car, which we should put in here, linking Liquid Air as we don't have another article and combining for both uses of cryo storage is good for now. If the articles grow, sure we can split at that point. How does that sound? Widefox; talk 14:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. As the article is about energy storage rather than a particular supplier of the technology (or a particular innovation), and considering the opinion linked to in the external link (which I refrained from including as a ref due to it being a wiki), I think the article would benefit from more opinions, and so suffers currently from being rather promotional - oh look a silver bullet. Widefox; talk 01:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thermodynamic negligence

The following description needs to be reworked to something less add odds with accepted understanding of thermodynamics: "...to capture the cold generated by evaporating the cryogen..." .\ 'Cold' is not generated nor captured any more than curtains generate and capture 'darkness'. 70.171.44.124 (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)BGRIFFIN[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cryogenic energy storage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]