Talk:Confit byaldi
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recipe
[edit]Once the recipe has been transwikied to the Wikibooks:Cookbook as they are specifically excluded from Wikipedia (see WP:ISNOT#HOWTO) - is there enough here to justify an article to itself or would it be better merged into the main Ratatouille article? I think it would be better merged. FlagSteward 21:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I wrote the article. It's not a recipe. The portion describing how the dish is made is relevant to the dish and its notability, in that this was created for and a significant issue in a major film. It is a separate subject than ratatouille: a different dish with a unique history. Wikidemo 18:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Name is a misnomer
[edit]This recipe, (Kellers version, the article sems to make no reference to how the original was prepared) may be a unique way of presenting ratatouille but it is certainly not a confit, it's simply pretentious. Confits almost always refer to preserved meats or fruits and occasionally to condiments.Awotter 19:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- The culinary word is full of metaphors and allusions. I would call it creative use of two different languages. Wikidemo 23:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Confit byaldi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metropulse.com/news/2007/aug/02/ratatouille-for-real/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Origin
[edit]The opening paragraph reads, "Confit byaldi is a variation on the traditional French dish ratatouille by French chef Michel Guérard, originally developed for the Pixar film Ratatouille."
Later in the article, it says that Guérard included the dish in his 1976 book, and that Keller adapted it in 1999. The "Ratatouille" film didn't come out until 2007. It seems that it would be fair to mention that it was included in the film, or even (if a reliable source can be found to back the claim) that it was made famous by the film. But "originally developed" seems very wrong, unless I'm missing something.DoctorEric (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)