Jump to content

Talk:Cold War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleCold War was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 16, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 28, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 9, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 7, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 3, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 21, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 23, 2019Good article reassessmentDelisted
November 25, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 16, 2008, April 16, 2009, April 16, 2010, April 16, 2011, April 16, 2013, April 16, 2017, and April 16, 2019.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of February 19, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Remove the grey portion?

[edit]

Although cold war is the main period of our human history, why the infobox has the subheading which conaisting the period of time and the fact cold war is part of post ww2 era. So why someone even added that? We should move the time period from gray area into white area within the pages infobox. Any suggwstion? @The Banner 182.253.54.87 (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what do you want exactly? And why do you ping me? The Banner talk 08:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Banner, i want to remove the gray part of the infobox of cold war, where it shows the date and the part of event it belongs. I ping you because i want to bring discussion into removing the gray portion so cold war is an independent period ie it is not part of the aftermath of ww2. 182.3.43.247 (talk) 01:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then make a clear proposal (under a separate header) to do this. I like to see your arguments. The Banner talk 09:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War never ended

[edit]
Block evasion by User:HarveyCarter.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Many historians have argued that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the rise of China shows the Cold War never ended. 2A00:23C5:C416:A601:84CB:18D9:E9CA:8A0 (talk) 13:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?--Jack Upland (talk) 03:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-cold-war-never-ended/ (2A00:23C5:C416:A601:5101:5CA7:B5D6:D22C (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Roger Kiska is not a historian, let alone many historians. (Hohum @) 19:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How cold war never ended 41.122.68.162 (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clear the gray part of the infobox of this page?

[edit]

@The Banner here is the proposal: remove the gray apart of the infobox about cold War. The reason for doing this is the statement that cold War is not considered a part of the aftermath of ww2 but rather an independent time period where the war between ideologies ensues until the fall of USSR in 1991. 2404:C0:2F10:0:0:0:4460:A182 (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just a statement, no sources or content-related arguments given. The Banner talk 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hohum, please cold war is an independent period, where it has own right to be a time era without worrying the fact it is part of the aftermath of world war 2. 182.253.54.117 (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference

[edit]

@User-duck: Your edit here added a reference — {{sfn|Singh|1995|p=130}} — that does not point to a citation. Can this error be fixed? —GoldRingChip 20:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did not add the reference. I added the sfn template which allowed the CS1 software to report the ref error. Maybe you can track down the editor that added the ref. User-duck (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Found in old page revision, also fixed year. (Hohum @) 16:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3rd paragraph bad grammar; "rose to leader of the USSR"

[edit]

idk sorry just has bad grammar 24.51.232.181 (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]