Talk:Cognitive processing therapy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cognitive processing therapy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 14 December 2010 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cognitive processing therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some Thoughts for Improvement

Hello! I think the article as of right now is great, it's very concise and accessible. I only have a few minor suggestions that could be helpful. First, in the introduction of the entry, it might be helpful to clarify what "stuck points" are, either by hyperlinking it to a definition or stating it in the sentence itself. I know you do define stuck points further down in the article, but it might flow better for readers if it's defined early on. However, this is definitely more of a stylistic suggestion. Second, I can see why you chose to use the word education when describing the explanation of symptoms as the first step of CPT, but maybe using the wording "psychoeducation" and keeping the definition you have already would help integration of mental health and everyday life. Third, I would suggest making a separate section for the structure subheadings that are currently under the Four Essential Parts section. Also it could be helpful to add the exclusion criteria for CPT group therapy in the group therapy structure subheading. I hope this was helpful! MariahBeltran (talk) 06:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History

I came to this page looking for some of the history of development and research on CPT. I did a quick Google search, and the only thing I found in two minutes or so was an "about us" page by some CPT researchers where they claim some "firsts". Given that these are some of the same researchers cited in the article already, that seemed pretty believable. There are probably better citations for this info out there, and much more history should probably be added.

My understanding (based on a This American Life podcast I heard on it) is that CPT is backed by some solid research, but right now none of that is really mentioned. The citations include a bunch of RCT on it; I'm guessing that there are review papers or treatment recommendations that mention the research support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TChapProctor (talk • contribs) 22:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

manualized = described in a manual??

I am confused by the word "manualized" in the first sentence. Does that mean the process is described in a manual, e.g. a printed book, or does it mean that it is "hands on" or something else? Perhaps this can be glossed, wikilinked, or otherwise clarified. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]