Talk:Clough Williams-Ellis

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

A critical critique of CWE can be found on [http://www.stefan-szczelkun.org.uk/taste/Chapter5-Clough%20Williams-E.html] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Szczels (talk • contribs) 08:53, 3 February 2006

Wikification

This article needs to be wikified, and the massive "works" references need to be in list format, not the unfathomable paragraph format they're currently in. In fact, the "works" references probably should be reduced in some way; they occupy a disproportionate amount of the article, approximately overshadowing the biographical information by twenty-to-one. This is absurd. 12.22.250.4 18:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Pages

My thanks to Trident13 for separating out my very long list of Clough's works. In response to the anonymous contributor who complains that the works of an architect (which are the reason for his notability) make a longer item than the brief biographical information about those aspects of his life not concerned with his public career, isn't this inevitable? I agree it's a long list and it has now been converted from the paragraph format but to exclude as comprehensive an account as possible of the work of a person whose place in Wikipedia depends on his output seems a little odd. Ghughesarch 12:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agreed! As an encyclopaedia, it's good for an architect if we have a full list of works - much as for a musical singer, a complete discography is a good piece of fact. The List of Works still needs a lot of work to make it "easier" reading, but there are also lot's of items of fact which need to be included in the main biographical article. Rgds, - Trident13 13:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clough Williams-Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clough Williams-Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615073222/http://www.virtualportmeirion.com/plasbrondanw/plas.htm to http://www.virtualportmeirion.com/plasbrondanw/plas.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]