Talk:Cloud Kingdoms

File:Cloudkingdoms arrow world c64.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Cloudkingdoms arrow world c64.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 16 November 2011 File:Cloudkingdoms crystal world c64.png has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 16 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cloud Kingdoms/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 21:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey, another one. Cognissonance (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Gameplay

• Link "top-down perspective" to Top-down perspective.
• On the negative side WP:POV

Reception and legacy

• Reviews for Cloud Kingdom on Amiga computers were mixed I don't get that impression from reading the paragraph.

Overall

Looks good. Is there a particular reason you like adding info about the price? I don't mind, but it's mostly unheard of. Cognissonance (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Cognissonance:. I addressed the concerns under gameplay but, regarding the mixed reviews, I agree with you that "mixed" probably isn't a perfect way to describe the results, but I'm not sure what might be better summary. Would it be better to just omit the first sentence altogether and let the reviews speak for themselves per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV? In regards to the price, I included it when I was working on the Llamatron article, because the fact that it was shareware at a low price was important to its notability based on the money it generated. I then included it in Star Goose because reviews for the budget release felt that it was a better value for the money at the lower price point and consequently it got better reviews. I suppose here it's not as important, but I do find the price points to be somewhat informative (and the differences were notable enough to be mentioned in at least some of the sources). Canadian Paul 12:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Since the lowest score (besides the 5 out of 10 from Datormagazin) is 71% from Amiga Joker, I suggest switching "mixed" to "positive". Cognissonance (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Alright @Cognissonance:, that makes sense, so I've gone ahead and made the change. Please let me know what else needs to be done. Canadian Paul 13:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

No, that's pretty much it. Great quality on both nominations. Passed. Cognissonance (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thanks again for taking the time to do both reviews! Canadian Paul 16:48, 7 July 2018 (UTC)