Jump to content

Talk:California State Route 198/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 00:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • I would reword the first sentence of the lead to mention both termini of the route.
    • The first external link in the article is dead.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • The route could use some detail about the physical surroundings. Are the mountains along the route wooded or bare? Are the rural valleys agricultural, grassland, or desert? Are the developed areas residential or commercial?
    • The history could use some more details about the construction of the freeway portions of SR 198. It says it was added to the freeway system in 1959, but does not say when the freeway sections were built and how long it took or cost.
    • Added details. I realize there is a bit of ambiguity between "freeway" and "expressway"... that is because the maps I have aren't 100% clear either, but this is the best I can do with what I have. --Rschen7754 06:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 00:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should be good to go. --Rschen7754 19:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 01:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]