Talk:Buckingham

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

86.133.20.196 voiced an unwelcome opinion of Buckingham that does not belong in Wikipedia - a place of knowledge, not distastful remarks.

Pictures? History?

Is no one going to mention the rich history such as the fact it was founded by Bucca etc.. etc.. The Old Gaol things like that?

And why are there no pictures? We need pictures!!

--62.255.84.30 22:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get out there with a camera, sign up to [1] and upload them under gfdl-user licence. It's that easy! If you want it, make it happen. --Concrete Cowboy 22:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Commons, there are already loads of pics but don't let that discourage you from adding more. I've used the County Jail one as it seems to fit best with the article. You could still write the History section! --Concrete Cowboy 22:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St Romwald - a spoof?

There are no references anywhere on the internet (that google can find) except mirrors of this article. I reads like a spoof. I've commented it out unless and until somone produces a citation.

Will this do http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=4667? Scribble Monkey 13:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And this one http://www.buckingham.ac.uk/life/buck/bucktown/rumbold.html Scribble Monkey 13:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buckingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buckingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]