Talk:Battle of Minden

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Military history: British / European / French / German / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Untitled

Corrected the inaccuracy concerning the court-martial of Sackville after the battle. He requested said trail voluntarily, it was not imposed upon him. Rockfall 17:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy re. numbers of French casualties

In the text it says that "the French lost between 10,000 and 11,000 men," in the side box it says "7,086 killed, wounded or missing." roger.duprat.copenhagen

Fixed. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 23:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle Honours

"Two Batteries from the Royal Regiment of Artillery carry the Minden battle honour." This sentence appears in the 'Minden in regimental tradition' section.

It could do with a spot of re-wording, because as far as I know, the Royal Artillery does not have any battle honours - apart from their guns. The nearest they have, is the word 'Ubique' (Everywhere), like the Royal Engineers. Unless things have changed drastically since I was 'in'.

RASAM (talk) 21:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is not entirely true. Yes the Royal Regiment of Artillery is no longer awarded battle honours but those Battery's that have been awarded them still hold them. The guns & weapon systems are not given the battle honour, they display them. The guns & weapon systems are the Regimental Colour's and are paraded as such. Another example of a battle honour for a Royal Artillery Battery is 9 (Plassey) Battery Royal Artillery of 12th Regiment Royal Artillery which was awarded the battle honour Plassey after taking part in the Battle of Plassey 23 June 1757. The Battery's take their battle honours very seriously and being an ex member of 36 (Arcot) Bty, 58 (Eyres) Bty, T Bty (Shah Sujah's Troop), 94 (New Zealand) Bty and 12 (Minden) Bty have first hand experience of this. Kind regards RoyCrockford (talk) 07:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

British participants

The regiments listed are only those of the infantry. Amongst the others regiments were: Royal Horse Guards: now the Blues and Royals 1st Dragoon Guards: now the Queen’s Dragoon Guards 3rd Dragoon Guards: later the 3rd Carabineers and now the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards The Royal Scots Greys: now the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards 10th Dragoons: later the 10th Light Dragoons, then the 10th Hussars, then the Royal Hussars and now the King’s Royal Hussars. I am not sure if this list is correct or complete - I suspect not, so ask someone more knowledgeable than I to please take a look. Shipsview (talk) 10:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1st line, 14 squadrons under Mostyn, excl Hanoverian:

1st Dragoon guards (general Bland's regiment)

6th Iniskilling Dragoons

Blues (old 1st regiment of Horse)

Life Guards

Second line, 10 squadrons, Granville Elliot excl Hanoverian regiments.

Howard's (3rd Dragoon Guards)

Mordaunt's (10th Dragoons)

Scot Greys (2 squadrons)

Rebel Redcoat (talk) 13:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Minden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Welsh Fusiliers

"The Royal Welch Fusiliers do not wear roses on Minden Day as the Minden Rose was incorporated into the roundel of their cap badge and so is worn every day of the year"

This is explanation is erronious. The RWF badge bore as an emblem the Prince of Wales' feathers. The error appears to arise from a confusion with the 7th Royal Fusiliers who did bear a rose on their badge.

There is no reference to roses in accounts of Minden in regimental histories of 1850 and 1889, or to celebrations on the anniversary of the battle. JF42 (talk) JF42 (talk) 09:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]