Talk:Arachnology

Spiders Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Mid‑importance

Arachnology is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Arachnologists

I have no idea who Rick West is, but this should very probably be replaced by a list of important arachnologists, now and then. --Sarefo 01:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC) The equipment they use is there eyes and there sense of smell so they can observe the arachnids. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.96.26.118 (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.andtan.newmail.ru/list/
Triggered by \bnewmail\.ru\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arachnology/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

TODO:

history of arachnology
famous arachnologists (apart from Rick West ;)
specialized fields

Last edited at 21:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Added several arachnological societies - do I need to add a source?

I just added 13 more scientific arachnological societies to that section. (and 2 tarantula societies) Do I need to cite my sources for these? I assumed not, since they can be located with simple searches, but I thought I should ask, since I am new to editing. My main sources for these additions were pages from the International Society of Arachnology and British Society of Arachnology websites, but I also verified most of them by going to their official pages. I do not yet know how to cite sources on the Wiki pages, but if they should be added, I can search out the instructions. Please provide feedback. Thanks. --The Spider Chick (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]