Talk:Anheuser-Busch brands

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anheuser-Busch brands article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Beer Mid‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Zach Dean (April 19, 2023). "SOMEONE ERASED BUD LIGHT'S ENTIRE WIKIPEDIA PAGE". OutKick. Retrieved April 21, 2023. And now, Bud Light's entire Wikipedia is gone. Vanished. Erased from the internet, which is hard to do in today's world.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWLCorona

Bud Dry

I just bought Bud Dry this weekend, are we sure it is discontinued? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.122.133 (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Light...

Distilled pinecones? Seriously? Why do I think a vandal has been here?76.246.235.134 (talk) 18:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I couldn't find anything else to support that. I'm going to remove.64.126.121.67 (talk) 20:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Natty Daddy

In Pennsylvania, Natty Daddy has a 6% ABV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F470:12:2:D6BE:D9FF:FEA0:6521 (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I visited the gas station today and it said it was 8% ABV. Does the ABV differ by state?Random from the burgh (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why Was This Reorganization Done?

I recall the Natural Light article. It had some informative text and a photograph someone contributed. No doubt that the Budweiser and Bud Light articles were yet more advanced and good. So what is the purpose of their having been reduced and stuck here in a "brands" article? Do people go looking for information on brands? I think not that often, but often surely people must seek to find out about specific beers or Coca Cola or whatever. I must say I don't understand why these individual beers here, each with its own history, had to be cut down to short bits in this "brands" article. It seems to me whoever made this happen must have sacrificed a great deal of useful information that previous editors worked hard on, and it hasn't done Wikipedia readers any favors, either. DanielM (talk) 01:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not hearing any response, I reverted Natural Light. It'll have its own article, and fine if it has a paragraph here as well. I'll leave it to others to repair damage to the articles of the other beverages, for example Bud Light, which has been reduced to a 25-word entry here. DanielM (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tequiza Reference Link

The external link referring to "Tequiza" being a defunct brand is now dead. I'm don't know of any other places this maybe referenced, so I'm not sure how to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.74.89 (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First try at light beer

I do believe that Anheuser-Busch did a beer called A-B Light in order to test the market without possibly sullying the Budweiser name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.33.164 (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Land Shark Lager is usually consumed with a lime.??

Below the LandShark photo it says "Land Shark Lager is usually consumed with a lime." This needs citation. No where on the land shark website is the beer featured with a lime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nichos (talk • contribs) 02:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anheuser-Busch brands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100407083621/http://www.beercollections.com:80/Breweries/Missouri/Busch_Beer.htm to http://www.beercollections.com/Breweries/Missouri/Busch_Beer.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dilly, Dilly redirects here

Dilly, Dilly redirects to this article, with no explanation and no occurrences of the word "Dilly" in the article. Needs explanation. —Theodore Kloba (☎) 18:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bud light beer

I had someone claiming to working for bud light beer@ advertising to sent them a pic of your vehicle to do a car wrap that advertising bud light beer. And said that they would pay $400 a week for 3 months long. The problem is they sent me a check for$1900 now they want me to put it in my account and them send money to someone else I don't think this check was there or it's phoney money. Please let me know what I can do about this Dustin1979Hawkins (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Budweiser

I would move all of the Budweiser beers up with the the fist Budweiser mentioned. The organization of the article starts with Budweiser, goes to Bud Light products, then proceeds to go back to the rest of the Budweiser products. Would make more sense to go through the Budweiser products, then move on to the Bud Light products. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clymernl (talk • contribs) 22:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Bud Light as it's own, separate article

I personally find it odd that the biggest-selling beer in the United States does not have it's own article. I propose that Bud Light have one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rube Dali, the DodoHorse (talk • contribs) 02:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

violent rhetoric

The article currently includes this unsourced nugget: "spoke out against the violent rhetoric used by those boycotting the beverage."

Umm, sorry, but perhaps this could be "some of those boycotting..." as surely not everyone participating is doing this. I would guess it is a tiny minority, in fact, but of course, that isn't known because it isn't sourced or referenced beyond the press spokesman simply making things up. 2604:3D09:C77:4E00:DDD7:2001:2BA7:79A4 (talk) 13:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shock Top sold to Tilray

Shock Top is now sold to Tilray: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/08/07/2720135/0/en/Tilray-Brands-Announces-Agreement-to-Acquire-Eight-Beer-Beverage-Brands-From-Anheuser-Busch-Fueling-Tilray-s-Future-in-the-U-S-Craft-Beer-Industry.html 2A02:2455:460:DA00:48F:A1E:E93A:4045 (talk) 21:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black Crown?

I think the addition of the short lived Black Crown sub-brand is warranted. Editz001 (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]