Talk:Airborne collision avoidance system

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Merger with TCAS

This article should be merged with Traffic Collision Aviodance System (TCAS) since both are same.Joy1963 18:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. TCAS is a proprietary system mandated on larger aircraft. ACAS is the generic term for such systems, of which there are a substantial number.PrairieOjibway (talk) 04:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be no source for ACAS is the generic term for such systems, but I found many sources that contradict this view and say that TCAS is the only ACAS implementation in existence; I suggest splitting electronic conspicuity systems and ground collision avoidance systems from this article to eliminate confusion. Created a discussion about the former in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation#Electronic_conspicuity.

Pinging @Joy1963, PrairieOjibway, and PrimalBlueWolf: PaulT2022 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Airplane database

Could it be that ACAS is also a flight hours and cycles database? 172.176.243.98 18:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Q, but no. It's collision avoidance only.PrairieOjibway (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too Technical

The technical jargon should probably be dialed down, something that might be easier with cited sources.

TSO AD

What, exactly, was the "flaw in the TSO" that kept it from being useful? (BTW, vote "no" to merge; ACAS is a completely diff type sys to TCAS.) TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 04:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airborne collision avoidance system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100421004027/http://www.eurocontrol.int/msa/public/standard_page/ACAS_ICAO_Provisions.html to http://www.eurocontrol.int/msa/public/standard_page/ACAS_ICAO_Provisions.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-GCAS

Im surprised there is no mention of Auto-Ground Collision Avoidance Systems in this article. Is it something that has been removed previously? PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]