Talk:Ahasuerus

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Article Change

The original Wiki page stated;

19th century Bible commentaries generally identified him with Xerxes I of Persia, although this assumption is now rejected by other scholars.

And referenced;

The Religious Policy of Xerxes and the "Book of Esther", Littman, Robert J., The Jewish Quarterly Review, 65.3, Jan 1975, p.145-148.

This is not what the reference says, page 148 of that article states;

Whatever one's judgment about the origins of Purim, whether Esther and Mordecai are historical figures, or merely gods demoted to the human level, it is agreed that the Book of Esther has a historical setting in the reign of Xerxes, and it is replete with details of Persian court life. It is the purpose of this paper, while not denying the romantic and ritual elements and complicated amalgamation of history, religion and romance, to return to the search for historical material, particularly in the reign of Xerxes, which may be connected to the Book of Esther

The article concludes on page 155 with;

Many unanswered questions remain about the Book of Esther in regard to its origins, composition and literary merits, but it is beyond the scope of this paper to delve into these aspects. What has emerged from this paper is the following: The Book of Esther is set in the reign of Xerxes, who was heavily committed to Zoroastrianism of an orthodox variety and who reversed the practice of religious tolerance of his predecessors. I will now change the page to reflect the source.

Considerations for Cyrus as Ahasuerus in the Book of Esther

The story of Curus and Cassandane is preserved in the first couple of chapters in Herodotus Book 3. There are many similarities between the two stories. Of all the Persian Kings it was only Cyrus the Great that was recorded as being influenced by a beautiful orphan, her name was Netetis. The Kings wife (Cassandane) was quite jealous of her. Herodotus says that Egypt was invaded by Cassandane’s son Cambyses because he hated the way his father chose Netetis over his mother. Also it’s the death of Cassandane that clears the way for Cyrus to free the Jews who were captive in Babylon, because when Vashti (Cassandane) finally dies, the Jews are freed from Babylon, that very same year. Therefore the Book of Esther is important because it’s the story of Cyrus the Great and why he chose to free the Jews.

Esther is Nitetis, Vashti is Cassandane, Ahasuerus is Cyrus the Great Mordecai is the eye doctor.

There isn’t anything that would exclude Cyrus the Great as being the king who was named Ahasuerus in the book of Esther. At the same time, the fourth chapter of Ezra would make it impossible for Ahasuerus to be Artaxerxes. Not to mention the book of Nehemiah. Ezra was sent to Judah by Artaxerxes in the seventh year of Artaxerxes (Ezra 7:6-7), Nehemiah became the governor of Judah under Artaxerxes from the 20th year of his reign until the 32nd year (Nehemiah 5:14). Certainly this could easily be Artaxerxes II, but it’s impossible for it to be Artaxerxes I. If Ezra entered Jerusalem in the 7th year of Artaxerxes, then this can only be Artaxerxes II (398 BCE) in Ezra chapter 7. The king named Ahasuerus in the book of Esther gave the green light to Haman to kill all the Jews , that order went out in that kings twelfth year of reign (Esther 3:7). Another question that arises is why doesn’t Ahasuerus in the book of Esther know that Cyrus the Great had already freed the Jews in writing? Or how come Ahasuerus in the book of Esther sees the Jews as a bunch of rag tag nomads? Is that possible if Ahasuerus in the book of Esther came after Cyrus?

Historical accuracy

@Acjones49: About attempt to remove some bias against historical accuracy in Scripture; more needed—the historical accuracy of the Book of Esther is dead in the water in the mainstream academia. We follow the mainstream academia, not your church. tgeorgescu (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Some scholars"

Here are more WP:RS: ^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

Basically, this is where the rift lies between mainstream Bible scholars, on one hand, and fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals, on the other hand. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We need multiple sources to establish that the Book of Esther is fiction? I thought that was common knowledge. None of the persons depicted in the fairy tale have any resemblance to historical figures. Dimadick (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ McCullough, W. S. (28 July 2011) [15 December 1984]. "AHASUREUS – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 3 April 2020. There may be some factual nucleus behind the Esther narrative, but the book in its present form displays such inaccuracies and inconsistencies that it must be described as a piece of historical fiction.
^ Shaked, Shaul (6 March 2012) [15 December 2003]. "HAMAN – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 3 April 2020. The story of the Book of Esther has not been corroborated by historical sources, and the figure of Haman could well be fictitious.
^ Meyers, Carol (2007). Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. p. 325. ISBN 9780199277186. Like the Joseph story in Genesis and the book of Daniel, it is a fictional piece of prose writing involving the interaction between foreigners and Hebrews/Jews.
^ Hirsch, Emil G.; Dyneley Prince, John; Schechter, Solomon (1906). "ESTHER". In Singer, Isidor; Adler, Cyrus (eds.). Jewish Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. pp. 235–236. Retrieved 25 April 2020. The vast majority of modern expositors have reached the conclusion that the book is a piece of pure fiction, although some writers qualify their criticism by an attempt to treat it as a historical romance.

Source of the Koine?

The article opens with the Koine Greek, Ἀσουήρος. Later, the article states that the Septuagint refers to Artaxerxes, which in Koine would be Ἀρταξέρξης. So which is it? Ἀσουήρος or Ἀρταξέρξης? Here's my source.

https://biblebento.com/index.html?lxx1i&190.1.1 Geraldpriddle (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Encyclopædia_Iranica_1984-1] McCullough, W. S. (28 July 2011) [15 December 1984]. "AHASUREUS – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 3 April 2020. There may be some factual nucleus behind the Esther narrative, but the book in its present form displays such inaccuracies and inconsistencies that it must be described as a piece of historical fiction.

[Encyclopædia_Iranica_2003-2] Shaked, Shaul (6 March 2012) [15 December 2003]. "HAMAN – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 3 April 2020. The story of the Book of Esther has not been corroborated by historical sources, and the figure of Haman could well be fictitious.

[3] Meyers, Carol (2007). Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. p. 325. ISBN 9780199277186. Like the Joseph story in Genesis and the book of Daniel, it is a fictional piece of prose writing involving the interaction between foreigners and Hebrews/Jews.

[JewishEncyclopedia.com-4] Hirsch, Emil G.; Dyneley Prince, John; Schechter, Solomon (1906). "ESTHER". In Singer, Isidor; Adler, Cyrus (eds.). Jewish Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. pp. 235–236. Retrieved 25 April 2020. The vast majority of modern expositors have reached the conclusion that the book is a piece of pure fiction, although some writers qualify their criticism by an attempt to treat it as a historical romance.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]