Jump to content

Talk:A Hunka Hunka Burns in Love

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleA Hunka Hunka Burns in Love has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starA Hunka Hunka Burns in Love is part of the The Simpsons (season 13) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 6, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

confusing

[edit]

"Gloria is about to tell Burns that she is breaking up..."

Like a ship? Not breaking up with him, because after all it is their first date. Brainhell 01:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the wording on that part, hopefully it's better now. JW 04:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not 100% sure

[edit]

I'm pretty sure that the menu at the Chinese restaurant says "sweetened" in any of these, but the video quality wasn't good enough for me to be sure it says sweetened - I know it starts with s, ends in -ed and looks like "sweetened" but I'm not 100% sure that's the word - if anyone is sure of the word please change it or confirm it on here. JW 04:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunka Hunka

[edit]

Can someone please tell me what does Hunka Hunka mean exactly?

Norum 07:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:A Hunka Hunka Burns in Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew RD 17:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I shall be conducting the review. -- Matthew RD 17:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lets see how the article goes against the GA criteria:

  1. Well written: Fails at present. See notes below
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Duly cited throughout. Passed.
  3. Broad in coverage: No issues there. Passed.
  4. Neutral: No issues there either. Passed.
  5. Stable: No edit war over past few months. Passed.
  6. Images: All checks out fine. Non free image uses the right tags. "Excellent" (Passed)

Other than that, it was an "excellent" read. Just a few issues here and there. I will place it on hold until the issues are addressed. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 18:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Hunka Hunka Burns in Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]