Jump to content

User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Request: thanks
AE: new section
Line 65: Line 65:
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You know why. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 04:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You know why. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 04:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|}
|}

== AE ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result_concerning_Volunteer_Marek] --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 06:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:38, 8 March 2019

The Barnstar of Good Humor
"happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
*hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RFC Request

Dear Fellow Wikipedian


I would like to invite you to my RFC request on  the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.


Kind Regards

Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:19, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement topic ban modified

For the reasons discussed here, the topic ban imposed here is reduced to one month in duration, starting now. Sandstein 11:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per the clear consensus of admins commenting on your appeal, this sanction is overturned in its entirety. GoldenRing (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gab (social network)#Gab Dissenter merge. Hi Marek. As you were one of the main participants on the page, this RfC may be of your interest. Cheers. Tsumikiria 🌹🌉 23:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Request

I have been quietly asking T. Canens to undo their sanction of me which has been active for 750+ days now. You lobbied for this sanction because I'd commented on one of the many cases Cirt brought to AE as Sagecandor. I had noticed that they were, as you say, making things up, by accusing Tlroche of "falsifying their signature". I had also, as you know, like many others, noticed that Sage was a long-term user hiding in a new account. So, given your own minor worries about AE, I wondered if you wanted to pop over to T.Canens page and withdraw your claim that I was "casting aspersions" or involved in a "battleground" mentality. Rather, I was helping AE administrators by drawing attention to problems with the diffs provided and providing evidence of Cirt calling people he didn't know Russian agents.

This is more in regards to SashiRolls' comments here. The relevant policies are WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:BATTLEGROUND. There's no reason for them to show up here and based on some flimsy excuse use this as a forum to attack another editor whom they happen to dislike. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC) source

I don't see any diffs in that statement, Mr. Marek. Would you be willing to undo the damage you've done? You can comment here. I imagine you'll be out of "jail" by the end of the evening, so I'd appreciate if you could take the time to clean up this old bit of dirty laundry. SashiRolls t · c 18:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever the merits of your appeal, if you're going to ask people to speak on your behalf, it's probably a good idea NOT to talk smack about them behind their back on off-Wiki forums.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like a true statement. Thanks for speaking up. To answer your question (why in the world would you want to be allowed to speak at AE?!), sometimes there are {{{appealing users}}} I might like to say something nice about. That's what made me first think about the sanction in fact. I've been distracted by that ban and the facts surrounding its imposition ever since. I haven't been creating as much content while I work through this "meta" issue. If you have any suggestions for things to add to my evolving guide on wp perplexity and plussitude let me know, it remains incomplete. With regard to speaking ow and smack, always remember: the opposite of irony is wrinkly. ^ᵕ^ SashiRolls t · c 08:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long time lurker short time poster

Did you know that the University of Michigan only admits students into a Doctoral program, so anyone saying they are a Masters Candidate at the University of Michigan is not a political science student? Hipocrite (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am unclear as to what this is suppose to relate to.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purple

The Purple Barnstar
You know why. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AE

[1] --Shrike (talk) 06:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]