User contributions for XeCyranium

27 October 2024

• 01:0501:05, 27 October 2024 diff hist −241 Oppositional defiant disorder →Race and gender bias in the US: Not exactly a medical or scientific source current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

26 October 2024

• 23:0523:05, 26 October 2024 diff hist 0 Religiosity and intelligence →Studies comparing religious belief and IQ: Typo current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 23:0423:04, 26 October 2024 diff hist −3 Religiosity and intelligence →Studies comparing religious belief and IQ: Grammar Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 23:0023:00, 26 October 2024 diff hist −58 Religiosity and intelligence →Studies comparing religious belief and IQ: Mentioning twice that religion isn't solely predicted by intelligence is unnecessary, removed along with some other language mistakes and obscurations Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 22:5322:53, 26 October 2024 diff hist −9 Religiosity and intelligence →Studies comparing religious belief and IQ: "However" is an odd choice of words when it confirmed the previous results Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 22:4822:48, 26 October 2024 diff hist −14 Religiosity and intelligence →Studies comparing religious belief and IQ: Removed weasel words, I wouldn't say they're "controversial", more just plainly racist, but I also wouldn't say that *here* because it's unmentioned in the source and doesn't really have a bearing on the study Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 October 2024

• 20:5920:59, 25 October 2024 diff hist −15 Courtney Hope Removing imprecise language current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:5320:53, 25 October 2024 diff hist +265 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 20:4820:48, 25 October 2024 diff hist +287 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 04:5104:51, 25 October 2024 diff hist −1 Fumio Kishida Typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:4404:44, 25 October 2024 diff hist +74 Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games →Redirects Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:3604:36, 25 October 2024 diff hist +1,671 Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 25 →October 25 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:2504:25, 25 October 2024 diff hist +472 Eirik Suhrke Nominated for RfD: see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion current Tags: Removed redirect Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:1604:16, 25 October 2024 diff hist +243 Talk:UFO 50 →Bad Link, IDK how to remove a redirect: Reply current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 04:1504:15, 25 October 2024 diff hist +727 Talk:UFO 50 →The game list: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
• 04:0604:06, 25 October 2024 diff hist −10 Natasha Hausdorff "International law expert" "she is a commentator on international law" unless one is afflicted with a poor memory I think they can do without useless repetition Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:0304:03, 25 October 2024 diff hist −581 Natasha Hausdorff →Israel advocacy: As made clear by BLPPRIMARY primary sources are insufficient when it comes to biographies and the onus is on the person seeking to add content to provide a reputable source Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:5903:59, 25 October 2024 diff hist −686 Natasha Hausdorff →Submissions to International Courts: "Multiple submissions highlighting inaccuracies etc etc" couldn't be more mealy mouthed Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:5603:56, 25 October 2024 diff hist −353 Natasha Hausdorff →Israel advocacy: Again secondary sources establishing this is something that actually matters are preferable Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:5503:55, 25 October 2024 diff hist −459 Natasha Hausdorff →Israel advocacy: Speaks where? Who's she speaking to? Why is this relevant? Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:5403:54, 25 October 2024 diff hist −581 Natasha Hausdorff →Israel advocacy: If ask if this is supposed to be a resume but it seems to really have been sourced to a resume, ideally, or rather only, non primary sources should be used Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:5103:51, 25 October 2024 diff hist −419 Natasha Hausdorff Well known by who? Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:4703:47, 25 October 2024 diff hist −125 Josh Hammer →Conservative activism: "On national tv" sourced to an article saying it wasn't broadcast, if it weren't already such a silly infomercial type hype phrase to include Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:4303:43, 25 October 2024 diff hist −422 Josh Hammer The fact he's got an Amazon listing of a book isn't notable Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:4203:42, 25 October 2024 diff hist −451 Josh Hammer What is this, an ad? Who cares what channels are broadcasting a talk show in the lead Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:2003:20, 25 October 2024 diff hist +208 Talk:Joe Biden →Efn footnotes start at [b]?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 02:2902:29, 25 October 2024 diff hist +170 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 02:2702:27, 25 October 2024 diff hist +352 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 02:2202:22, 25 October 2024 diff hist +794 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply

24 October 2024

• 22:5822:58, 24 October 2024 diff hist −33 Samir Kuntar Unless there's a Beirut I don't know about this is incorrect, as the article attests current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:4621:46, 24 October 2024 diff hist −3,769 Kenneth Blum The sources which didn't fail MEDRS were explicit in describing the poor quality of the evidence for these treatments current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:4321:43, 24 October 2024 diff hist +1,063 Kenneth Blum →Reward deficiency syndrome: Reverting poorly made content removal, and cleaning up wording of content as it had been prior to the removal Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:4021:40, 24 October 2024 diff hist +513 Kenneth Blum Restoring content improperly removed by an IP Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 October 2024

• 21:4821:48, 17 October 2024 diff hist −8 Lumberjanes Removing red links Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:4521:45, 17 October 2024 diff hist −2,147 Lumberjanes →Reception: "Academic these were more critical" is unsupported by any citation and is pretty obvious synthesis, neither of these two people are notable analysts or reviewers and neither of them are published in a reputable media journal. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:4321:43, 17 October 2024 diff hist −1,848 Lumberjanes →Reception: The opening sentence is moronic, "a rapidly growing fanbase" has no ref and is an imprecise term anyway, a tweet is not usable for simple sourcing reasons, and articles mentioning once in passing that fans called themselves something is not enough to justify a paragraph which is again almost entirely based on a single tweet in regards to its text. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:2621:26, 17 October 2024 diff hist −387 OpenPsych Useless citation, the quality of the publication is already cited in the body, while this ref only mentions the topic once in passing and not even in the context of pseudoscience Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 October 2024

• 21:0621:06, 16 October 2024 diff hist −5,804 Lumberjanes →Reception: Tweets about what fans can call themselves are pretty trivial, and some rando's thesis is the opposite of notable Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 October 2024

• 23:0223:02, 2 October 2024 diff hist −7 Seed oil misinformation →Medical and scientific opinion: Removed weaselly wording Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 22:5722:57, 2 October 2024 diff hist −68 Seed oil misinformation →Medical and scientific opinion: Effects on rats aren't a "however", it's a complete non-sequitur Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 September 2024

• 20:0820:08, 24 September 2024 diff hist +1 Gaza genocide What kind of paragraph starts with "thousands more are thought..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 September 2024

• 21:0621:06, 22 September 2024 diff hist +9 User:XeCyranium No edit summary current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:0221:02, 22 September 2024 diff hist −699 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks →Legitimacy of targets: Removing again as per previous edit Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:0021:00, 22 September 2024 diff hist −169 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks →International law: Removing as per previous edit Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:5920:59, 22 September 2024 diff hist −259 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks →Proportionality: Removed what seems like an unqualified opinion, political science isn't quite international law and the publication seems rather suspect given its founding this year and lack of citations from other sources Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:4020:40, 22 September 2024 diff hist −50 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks Removed the nickname, it's unmentioned in the article and implies the war at the border is being fought by more countries than in reality Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 September 2024

• 22:3622:36, 12 September 2024 diff hist −3,034 Megan Ellison I'm shocked this useless and hagiographic cruft managed to stay in the article for this long Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

7 September 2024

• 03:3903:39, 7 September 2024 diff hist −43 David Jaffe Removed vandalism current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

6 September 2024

• 16:0916:09, 6 September 2024 diff hist +1 Babylon's Fall Self-revert per mos current Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 16:0816:08, 6 September 2024 diff hist +1 Concord (video game) Nvm, there's a different mod standard for games Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit