User contributions for Nydas

3 September 2013

• 23:1423:14, 3 September 2013 diff hist −2,202 User:Nydas Quit 5 years ago current
• 23:1023:10, 3 September 2013 diff hist +224 User talk:Martinevans123 →Blacky Pictures Test: new section

2 September 2008

• 17:5217:52, 2 September 2008 diff hist +311 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs →Tamaskan dog: the Utonagan

30 August 2008

• 18:4018:40, 30 August 2008 diff hist +454 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs Tamaskan dog
• 18:1618:16, 30 August 2008 diff hist +346 Wikipedia:Featured article review/Spoo/archive2 →FARC commentary: remove

25 March 2008

• 09:5309:53, 25 March 2008 diff hist +195 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Wiki is not paper: tautological argument

24 March 2008

• 21:0221:02, 24 March 2008 diff hist +234 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Wiki is not paper: how often?

22 March 2008

• 09:5809:58, 22 March 2008 diff hist −66 Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) →Defining notability for fiction: the use of sales figures and merchandise for notability has never been explained
• 09:4909:49, 22 March 2008 diff hist +337 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Don't institutionalise lists: like WP:MUSIC
• 09:4309:43, 22 March 2008 diff hist +388 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →RE: "Depth of coverage" section: sprawling paragraph
• 09:1509:15, 22 March 2008 diff hist +261 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: special pleading

21 March 2008

• 15:3615:36, 21 March 2008 diff hist +698 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →RE: "Depth of coverage" section: it's a side effect
• 11:1111:11, 21 March 2008 diff hist +215 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: IGN, Gamespot, BBC
• 11:0111:01, 21 March 2008 diff hist +249 Talk:Spoo (food) →What a mess: self-published sources
• 10:5010:50, 21 March 2008 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) →Notable topics merit individual articles: removed errant bracket
• 10:5010:50, 21 March 2008 diff hist −245 Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) →Notable topics merit individual articles: removed bizarre dual notability system, unexplained and probably unexplainable
• 10:4210:42, 21 March 2008 diff hist +565 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →RE: "Depth of coverage" section: section = license for favouritism

20 March 2008

• 13:2213:22, 20 March 2008 diff hist +192 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →RE: "Depth of coverage" section: it's redundant
• 10:0210:02, 20 March 2008 diff hist −2,243 Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) removed depth of coverage section; unreadable, jargon-laden mixture of the redundant, the obvious and the ambiguous
• 09:4409:44, 20 March 2008 diff hist +314 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Question on how to proceed: the ambiguity
• 09:1809:18, 20 March 2008 diff hist +443 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: what makes them unreliable sources?

19 March 2008

• 18:1818:18, 19 March 2008 diff hist +8 Royal Air Force added fact tag to the 1000 aircraft, seems rather high, even including trainers

18 March 2008

• 22:4522:45, 18 March 2008 diff hist +167 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: Gazimoff's submission
• 22:4222:42, 18 March 2008 diff hist +454 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Regarding the PROD suggestion: the instructioncruft could be condensed
• 21:5521:55, 18 March 2008 diff hist +301 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: arbitary time limits and google-centric thinking
• 21:2321:23, 18 March 2008 diff hist +438 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Regarding the PROD suggestion: remove this pedantic instructioncruft
• 10:0410:04, 18 March 2008 diff hist +797 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Don't institutionalise lists: pre-conceived notions

17 March 2008

• 19:0519:05, 17 March 2008 diff hist +238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transistasis (2nd nomination) delete

16 March 2008

• 11:1411:14, 16 March 2008 diff hist +230 Talk:ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion →The intro is the problem: shortened first paragraph
• 11:1111:11, 16 March 2008 diff hist −170 ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion shortened intro
• 10:5310:53, 16 March 2008 diff hist +301 Talk:Spoo (food) star trek comparison
• 10:3510:35, 16 March 2008 diff hist +644 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Don't institutionalise lists: Richard Hannay example
• 09:4309:43, 16 March 2008 diff hist −508 Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) →Dealing with non-notable fictional topics: removed suggestion to prod; biased against low-traffic fiction articles

14 March 2008

• 22:1922:19, 14 March 2008 diff hist +551 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Don't institutionalise lists: no problem with mcmf stubs

13 March 2008

• 22:2422:24, 13 March 2008 diff hist +1,165 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Don't institutionalise lists: false equality and non-notable principals

12 March 2008

• 14:5914:59, 12 March 2008 diff hist +120 Edinburgh Phrenological Society added refs to support split paragraph
• 14:4514:45, 12 March 2008 diff hist +449 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) don't institutionalise lists
• 13:5813:58, 12 March 2008 diff hist +229 User talk:Joelr31 →FAR and ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion: concur

11 March 2008

• 21:5321:53, 11 March 2008 diff hist +21 Edinburgh Phrenological Society →The society: split sentence into two for better reading
• 13:5213:52, 11 March 2008 diff hist +399 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Agree with NTK: obscurantist
• 08:5808:58, 11 March 2008 diff hist +1,216 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Featured article process reformation / Recall of the Featured Article Director: agree with NTK

10 March 2008

• 19:3319:33, 10 March 2008 diff hist −9 ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion →Public impact: removed 'at large'
• 19:2819:28, 10 March 2008 diff hist +444 Wikipedia:Featured article review/ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive1 the sources are not very good
• 19:1819:18, 10 March 2008 diff hist +472 Wikipedia:Featured article review/ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive1 →ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion: not yet satisfied
• 16:2116:21, 10 March 2008 diff hist +331 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →Section break - request for clarification: favouritism

9 March 2008

• 19:5119:51, 9 March 2008 diff hist +26 User:Nydas added a new to do
• 19:5019:50, 9 March 2008 diff hist −25 User:Nydas update
• 14:5014:50, 9 March 2008 diff hist −11 Cabal →Use in relation to Computers and Usenet: toned down exaggeration
• 13:1313:13, 9 March 2008 diff hist −92 Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) →Dealing with non-notable fictional topics: removed useless sentence
• 13:0613:06, 9 March 2008 diff hist +175 Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) →When to act: multi-merges