User contributions for Hauskalainen

9 June 2011

• 17:1617:16, 9 June 2011 diff hist +99 User talk:Hauskalainen →Unblock request: sign
• 17:1517:15, 9 June 2011 diff hist +1,757 User talk:Hauskalainen unblock request

14 March 2011

• 16:4716:47, 14 March 2011 diff hist +349 User talk:Hauskalainen unblock request

13 March 2011

• 17:2217:22, 13 March 2011 diff hist +624 User talk:Hauskalainen →Death Panel
• 16:4716:47, 13 March 2011 diff hist +1,349 User talk:Hauskalainen →Death Panel: reply
• 16:2916:29, 13 March 2011 diff hist +2,980 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: reply
• 03:2103:21, 13 March 2011 diff hist +3,128 User talk:Hauskalainen →Death Panel: reply.. I did not intend to imply that FormerIP is a BNP supporter or that other editors are.....
• 02:2302:23, 13 March 2011 diff hist +150 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: Correction. I accidentally missed some text.
• 00:1200:12, 13 March 2011 diff hist +327 Affordable Care Act rvv
• 00:0400:04, 13 March 2011 diff hist +2,627 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: It simply is not verifiable. The only verifiable thing we have is that these journalists said this and that Palin has said nothing about the UK and NICE

12 March 2011

• 23:0623:06, 12 March 2011 diff hist +1,018 Death panel →Examples with similarities: Huckabee's claim is out of line with the facts, so added back the facts
• 22:3222:32, 12 March 2011 diff hist +252 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: I SPY COLLUSION FROM EDITORS CONNECTED TO EXTREME POLITICS
• 22:2522:25, 12 March 2011 diff hist +679 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?
• 19:3319:33, 12 March 2011 diff hist +1,438 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: we should not mislead the reader or give this undue weight. It is inaccurate reporting and not opinion
• 17:0917:09, 12 March 2011 diff hist +1,726 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?
• 07:2407:24, 12 March 2011 diff hist 0 Islamic terrorism No edit summary
• 07:2407:24, 12 March 2011 diff hist −51 Islamic terrorism Citation does not seem to support the claim that (a) a-Q was founded by Bin Laden or (b) that it was founded for the purpose stated in the fatwa. Some regard a-Q as having been an invention of the Americans
• 07:0707:07, 12 March 2011 diff hist −686 Socialized medicine →Rationing (Access, Coverage, Price, and Time): remove a nonsensical claim and a reference to a claim which has been debunked
• 06:4906:49, 12 March 2011 diff hist +32 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?: It is UNDUE to cite a POV that is not mainstream and especially when the direct claim is not verifiable
• 06:3506:35, 12 March 2011 diff hist +282 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?
• 06:3106:31, 12 March 2011 diff hist +1,623 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Is citing The Telegraph and the Sunday Times regarding NICE undue at death panel?
• 06:0606:06, 12 March 2011 diff hist +2,989 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 86 →Was Sarah Palin's "Death Panel" a reference to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence?: Others reporting does not even VERIFY this false claim

11 March 2011

• 21:5421:54, 11 March 2011 diff hist −1,203 Death panel Undid revision 418175157 by Jesanj for all the reasons previously stated

10 March 2011

• 19:3919:39, 10 March 2011 diff hist +158 User talk:Jesanj →Hauskalainen
• 19:1619:16, 10 March 2011 diff hist −1,203 Death panel for the nth thinme.. It is NOT ENOUGH just to be sourced.. it has to be accurate AND we must not add undue weight... NICE was mentioned in three places now two
• 18:0018:00, 10 March 2011 diff hist −24,024 User talk:Hauskalainen blank the page
• 17:5917:59, 10 March 2011 diff hist +134 User talk:Hauskalainen →it appears you edited logged out
• 09:3409:34, 10 March 2011 diff hist −15,291 Independent Payment Advisory Board not vandalism eamon just removing attempts by certain clique to politicize wikipedia _ see talk

6 March 2011

• 21:5021:50, 6 March 2011 diff hist +699 Talk:Health system →Lede section and definition: new section
• 21:2321:23, 6 March 2011 diff hist +182 Health system Health care systems are designed Those that are "the sum total of what there is" would be the definition of a '''health care hotch potch'''
• 21:0921:09, 6 March 2011 diff hist +516 Talk:Independent Payment Advisory Board →Reduced influence from congress
• 20:5520:55, 6 March 2011 diff hist +39 Talk:Death panel →NICE: I removed 2 nonsense claims and left one nonsense reference in place with its balancing explantion that has to be added back
• 20:5320:53, 6 March 2011 diff hist +831 Talk:Death panel →NICE: new section
• 20:4520:45, 6 March 2011 diff hist −750 Death panel →Reactions and analysis: remove more nonsense... Palin said NOTHING about NICE in the UK... this is pure bollox
• 20:4220:42, 6 March 2011 diff hist −453 Death panel →Rationing: removing one of THREE references to NICE ... WP:WEIGHT
• 20:4020:40, 6 March 2011 diff hist +526 Death panel →Examples with similarities: NICE is in this article
• 20:3220:32, 6 March 2011 diff hist −86 Affordable Care Act →Effective September 23, 2010: Tax began in July not September..and is already listed there so deleted the wrong Sept listing
• 20:2820:28, 6 March 2011 diff hist −1,486 Independent Payment Advisory Board →Political debate: deleted text for all the reasons given earlier... complete speculation with no place in an encylopedia

2 March 2011

• 23:5823:58, 2 March 2011 diff hist −1,484 Independent Payment Advisory Board Undid revision 416765361 by Jesanj As per long discussion at TALK- This breaches WP:CRYSTAL. There is a whole universe of opinions and this creates bias
• 23:5523:55, 2 March 2011 diff hist +937 Talk:Independent Payment Advisory Board →Reduced influence from congress: reply
• 23:4723:47, 2 March 2011 diff hist +1,096 Talk:Independent Payment Advisory Board →Holtz-Eakin: WP:COAT is irrelevant here but WP:CRYSTAL is breached if it is included
• 15:2115:21, 2 March 2011 diff hist −177 Affordable Care Act →Further reading: Fixed error in my last edit. Put list headings in their rightful place
• 15:1515:15, 2 March 2011 diff hist +248 Affordable Care Act →Further reading: Corrected error.,.. the Reconciliation Bill 2010 scoring was the final CBO scoring
• 13:1313:13, 2 March 2011 diff hist −526 Affordable Care Act →Further reading: Deleted outdated links.. neither of these describe what was enacted
• 11:3911:39, 2 March 2011 diff hist +2,005 Death panel Undid revision 416649215 by Jesanj i disagree. Explain yourself at TALK please

1 March 2011

• 23:4123:41, 1 March 2011 diff hist −2 Death panel →Rationing: link related paragraphs
• 23:3923:39, 1 March 2011 diff hist +2,007 Death panel →Rationing: The previous text did not tie Death Panel to rationing so added the quote from Palin where she did
• 22:1322:13, 1 March 2011 diff hist 0 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence →Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained: slight but important correction to be properly accurate
• 22:1022:10, 1 March 2011 diff hist +84 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence →Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained: NICE guidelines are always "must fund" and not "do not fund". PCTs can still fund if they choose to
• 22:0322:03, 1 March 2011 diff hist +767 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence →Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained: choices