User contributions for 90.222.127.214
Appearance
Results for 90.222.127.214 talk block log logs global block log filter log
2 November 2015
- 20:2220:22, 2 November 2015 diff hist +33 The Stone Roses No edit summary
- 16:3416:34, 2 November 2015 diff hist +7 The Stone Roses No edit summary
31 October 2015
- 04:4704:47, 31 October 2015 diff hist +10 Jas Mann →After "Spaceman": restore
30 October 2015
- 15:1615:16, 30 October 2015 diff hist −2 X-Press 2 No edit summary
27 October 2015
- 17:4617:46, 27 October 2015 diff hist −1 Grebo (music) No edit summary
- 17:4517:45, 27 October 2015 diff hist +15 Pop Will Eat Itself No edit summary
- 17:4317:43, 27 October 2015 diff hist +5 The Stone Roses (album) No edit summary
- 17:3817:38, 27 October 2015 diff hist +121 Fargo season 2 No edit summary
- 17:3817:38, 27 October 2015 diff hist −4,901 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
17 October 2015
- 14:2114:21, 17 October 2015 diff hist +121 Fargo season 2 No edit summary
6 October 2015
- 18:1818:18, 6 October 2015 diff hist +292 User talk:90.222.127.214 No edit summary
- 13:3213:32, 6 October 2015 diff hist +465 User talk:90.222.127.214 No edit summary
- 11:4111:41, 6 October 2015 diff hist +448 User talk:90.222.127.214 No edit summary
- 11:2511:25, 6 October 2015 diff hist −14 The Stone Roses (album) concision, clarifying English term for international readers
- 11:1311:13, 6 October 2015 diff hist +4 The Stone Roses (album) repetition
- 11:1111:11, 6 October 2015 diff hist 0 The Stone Roses (album) repetition
- 11:0711:07, 6 October 2015 diff hist +1 The Stone Roses (album) avoid repetition
- 11:0611:06, 6 October 2015 diff hist +468 Talk:The Stone Roses (album) →RfC: Should this revision be retained?
- 11:0011:00, 6 October 2015 diff hist +1 The Stone Roses (album) →Reception and legacy: reword
- 10:5710:57, 6 October 2015 diff hist +423 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 10:5510:55, 6 October 2015 diff hist −172 The Stone Roses (album) since I am WILLING TO COMPROMISE, I have removed the virgin article and retained the fasterlouder piece which was penned by a reputable journalist who has written for the guardian, rolling stone and ABC
- 10:3810:38, 6 October 2015 diff hist +217 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.222.127.214 reported by User:Clpo13 (Result: )
- 08:2908:29, 6 October 2015 diff hist −49 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 08:2108:21, 6 October 2015 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 08:2008:20, 6 October 2015 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 08:1908:19, 6 October 2015 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 08:1908:19, 6 October 2015 diff hist +172 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 08:1708:17, 6 October 2015 diff hist +653 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.222.127.214 reported by User:Clpo13 (Result: )
- 07:1807:18, 6 October 2015 diff hist −2,060 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
- 07:0507:05, 6 October 2015 diff hist +556 The Stone Roses (album) no, the editor who weighed in had no issue with the "most overrated" listings being added further down. did that, since NOBODY OWNS THE ARTICLE
- 06:5906:59, 6 October 2015 diff hist −1,146 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
5 October 2015
- 15:1915:19, 5 October 2015 diff hist +600 The Stone Roses (album) rv vandalism. user thinks pointing to irrelevant doctrines justifies everything he does to protect his favourite album from any criticism. again restoring my fully cited, uncontroversial edit
- 14:2814:28, 5 October 2015 diff hist +452 User talk:NottNott →RE: The Stone Roses
- 11:5311:53, 5 October 2015 diff hist +600 The Stone Roses (album) rv vandalism: removal of citation addition because user just doesn't like it and thinks he owns the article.
- 11:5211:52, 5 October 2015 diff hist +762 Talk:The Stone Roses (album) →Continued POV edits by IP(s)
- 11:4711:47, 5 October 2015 diff hist −1,149 User talk:90.222.127.214 rm harassment from vandal
4 October 2015
- 16:3816:38, 4 October 2015 diff hist +367 Talk:The Stone Roses (album) No edit summary
- 16:0716:07, 4 October 2015 diff hist +444 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism →User-reported
- 14:4314:43, 4 October 2015 diff hist +600 The Stone Roses (album) since ANYONE IS ALLOWED TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA AND ARTICLES ARE NOT OWNED BY ONE PERSON, i will absolutely add this text, supported by cites
3 October 2015
- 22:0922:09, 3 October 2015 diff hist −6,176 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
- 21:1321:13, 3 October 2015 diff hist −4,357 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
- 21:0621:06, 3 October 2015 diff hist +785 The Stone Roses (album) YOUR PROTECTION REQUEST WAS DENIED! YOU DO NOT OWN THE ARTICLE! JUST GROW UP!!!
- 21:0521:05, 3 October 2015 diff hist −3,400 User talk:90.222.127.214 ←Blanked the page
- 20:2920:29, 3 October 2015 diff hist +785 The Stone Roses (album) rv would-be article owner. desperation outlined by pointing to WP:NOR and hoping for the best when it has no relevance whatsoever
- 18:3318:33, 3 October 2015 diff hist −376 Talk:Kevin Owens withdrawing aggressive comment
- 18:1918:19, 3 October 2015 diff hist +89 The Stone Roses (album) adding note as this has caused massive problems in the past
- 18:1118:11, 3 October 2015 diff hist +696 The Stone Roses (album) restoring older cites for support