User contributions for 69.183.243.72

27 October 2006

• 06:2106:21, 27 October 2006 diff hist −219 Privileges or Immunities Clause →Interpretation of the Clause: spelling of Cato Institute, shortening Hyman quote
• 05:5305:53, 27 October 2006 diff hist −12 Privileges or Immunities Clause →Interpretation of the Clause: minor edit
• 05:5205:52, 27 October 2006 diff hist +767 Privileges or Immunities Clause →Interpretation of the Clause: quoting Hyman

25 October 2006

• 16:1016:10, 25 October 2006 diff hist +2 Due process →Development and use as legal doctrine: minor edit
• 07:4807:48, 25 October 2006 diff hist +8 Due process →Incorporation: minor edit
• 07:4607:46, 25 October 2006 diff hist −20 Due process →Incorporation: minor edits
• 07:4507:45, 25 October 2006 diff hist +323 Due process →Incorporation: explaining the significance of Amar's point, while linking Bingham and Howard.

24 October 2006

• 20:0820:08, 24 October 2006 diff hist 0 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: improving syntax
• 20:0520:05, 24 October 2006 diff hist +15 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
• 20:0420:04, 24 October 2006 diff hist −2 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: same
• 20:0320:03, 24 October 2006 diff hist 0 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: attempting to fix link
• 20:0120:01, 24 October 2006 diff hist −2 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: fixing link
• 19:5919:59, 24 October 2006 diff hist +2 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: fixing link
• 19:5819:58, 24 October 2006 diff hist +78 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: linking case
• 19:5619:56, 24 October 2006 diff hist −3 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: minor edit
• 17:2317:23, 24 October 2006 diff hist −43 Due process →Substantive due process: making more concise
• 17:1717:17, 24 October 2006 diff hist −11 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
• 17:1017:10, 24 October 2006 diff hist −8 Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution →Adoption of the Ninth Amendment: eliminating vandalism
• 14:0814:08, 24 October 2006 diff hist −4 Due process →Criticisms: minor edit
• 14:0614:06, 24 October 2006 diff hist −2 Due process →Criticisms: minor edit
• 14:0514:05, 24 October 2006 diff hist −3 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: minor edit
• 12:5512:55, 24 October 2006 diff hist +6 Troxel v. Granville the plaintiffs in this case were grandparents
• 12:4812:48, 24 October 2006 diff hist +4 Due process →Incorporation: italicizing case name
• 12:4712:47, 24 October 2006 diff hist +8 Due process →Incorporation: italicizing case names
• 12:4412:44, 24 October 2006 diff hist +34 Due process →Incorporation: linking
• 12:4012:40, 24 October 2006 diff hist −26 Due process →Incorporation: fixing link
• 12:3812:38, 24 October 2006 diff hist +57 Due process →Incorporation: linking
• 12:3412:34, 24 October 2006 diff hist +12 Due process linking
• 12:1412:14, 24 October 2006 diff hist +191 Due process →Criticisms: citing remarks by Scalia and Thomas on substantive due process
• 11:4211:42, 24 October 2006 diff hist −89 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
• 11:3611:36, 24 October 2006 diff hist +89 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: inserting sentence about the inability of Congress to remove the restraint on the other branches.
• 11:2111:21, 24 October 2006 diff hist +30 Constitution of the United States →Historical influences: specifying that the due process clause was the part of the Constitution based on Article 39 of Magna Carta.
• 11:1811:18, 24 October 2006 diff hist −94 Constitution of the United States →The Bill of Rights (1–10): Roe was based on Due Process, not the Fourth Amendment. Griswold was partly based on the Fourth, but the Court has since relied on Harlan's concurrence.
• 11:1211:12, 24 October 2006 diff hist 0 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: minor edit
• 11:1111:11, 24 October 2006 diff hist −87 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: text of the amendment is already at the top of the Wikipedia page
• 11:0911:09, 24 October 2006 diff hist +24 Due process →History prior to ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights: making paragraph chronological
• 11:0211:02, 24 October 2006 diff hist +5 Due process →Criticisms
• 11:0111:01, 24 October 2006 diff hist +10 Due process →Criticisms
• 11:0111:01, 24 October 2006 diff hist +179 Due process →Criticisms

23 October 2006

• 17:3117:31, 23 October 2006 diff hist 0 Due process →Incorporation: spelling
• 17:3117:31, 23 October 2006 diff hist −15 Due process →Incorporation: Correcting date. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy involved incorporating another provision of the 5th amendment.
• 17:2417:24, 23 October 2006 diff hist +21 Due process →Development and use as legal doctrine: clarifying about Dred Scott
• 16:4216:42, 23 October 2006 diff hist +149 Due process →Incorporation: adding final sentence
• 16:3516:35, 23 October 2006 diff hist +1 Due process →Interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments: spelling
• 16:3416:34, 23 October 2006 diff hist +9 Due process →Judicial review of substantive due process violations
• 16:3316:33, 23 October 2006 diff hist +11 Due process →Criticisms: minor edit
• 16:3216:32, 23 October 2006 diff hist +2 Due process moving paragraph from section on incorporation to section on criticism
• 16:1916:19, 23 October 2006 diff hist +4 Due process →Incorporation: minor edit
• 16:1816:18, 23 October 2006 diff hist +264 Due process →Incorporation: quoting Lincoln
• 16:0316:03, 23 October 2006 diff hist +8 Due process →Incorporation: clarifying