User contributions for 109.186.234.86

26 August 2013

• 21:4621:46, 26 August 2013 diff hist +258 Saving Private Ryan Undid revision 570315278 by Insulam Simia (talk) Why don't just remove Carney's Wiki entry? That way, fewer people will know that critiques of Hollywood even exist!
• 21:4521:45, 26 August 2013 diff hist +644 Woody Allen Undid revision 570316651 by Dawn Bard (talk) Wow! That Spielberg sure beeped you fast!
• 21:4521:45, 26 August 2013 diff hist +2,430 Wes Anderson Yes, the wotld's foremost academic film critic's writings aren't reliable. According to Wikipedia and its new boss Spielberg, however, random blogs are!
• 21:4221:42, 26 August 2013 diff hist +644 Woody Allen Here, I've done what you've asked me to do. However, I'm sure your new boss, Steven Spielberg, will not approve...
• 21:3921:39, 26 August 2013 diff hist −560 User talk:109.186.234.86 ←Blanked the page
• 21:3821:38, 26 August 2013 diff hist −560 User talk:109.186.234.86 Don't forget to send my congrats to your new boss, Steven Spielberg!
• 21:3821:38, 26 August 2013 diff hist +2,430 Wes Anderson Now what's wrong? I didn't break any silly Wikipedia policy and followed the suggestions of another user, you just don't allow any criticism of the Hollywood machine into your little hagiography
• 21:3621:36, 26 August 2013 diff hist −436 User talk:109.186.234.86 I care about schlarly/academic consensu, not about Wikipedia's silly policy. An film which clearly isn't an art film can't magically become one if some hack blogger/journalist wrote on his blog it is while that film doesn't meet any criteria for being one
• 21:3421:34, 26 August 2013 diff hist +2,430 Wes Anderson →Film career: Why not, indeed? Please change the format if I've made something wrong...
• 21:3221:32, 26 August 2013 diff hist −220 User talk:109.186.234.86 Because in the past (i.e., on that seventh-rate sunday morning cartoon's discussion page) fanboy editors refused to listen to what leading scholars had to say, instead clinging to Wikipedia's silly anti-scholarly so-called rules which ignore academia
• 21:3021:30, 26 August 2013 diff hist +111 Woody Allen Undid revision 570313965 by Binksternet (talk) Why's that? There are many links praising Allen here yet they're not deleted
• 21:2921:29, 26 August 2013 diff hist +258 Saving Private Ryan I admit I haven't listened to the news today. Seriously, was Wikipedia purchased today by Steven Spielberg, hence prohibiting any criticism whatsoever (even in the form of a minor link) of him? Is Wikipedia now an official Spielberg hagiography?
• 21:2921:29, 26 August 2013 diff hist +95 Husbands (film) Undid revision 570314014 by ThomasO1989 (talk) Carney is a Cassavetes authority. Why shouldn't he be at least mentioned here?
• 21:2721:27, 26 August 2013 diff hist −2,787 User talk:109.186.234.86 What's innapropriate about scholarly articles by the world's foremost academic film critic? Again, Wikipedia is not some Hollywood hagiography and critiques of it should not be disallowed!
• 21:2621:26, 26 August 2013 diff hist +233 John Cassavetes People here can't seem to take criticism of Hollywood lightly...
• 21:2521:25, 26 August 2013 diff hist +122 Paul Thomas Anderson I admit I haven't listened to the news today. Seriously, was Wikipedia purchased today by PTA, hence prohibiting any criticism whatsoever (even in the form of a minor link) of him? Is Wikipedia now an official PTA hagiography?
• 21:2421:24, 26 August 2013 diff hist +123 Jane Spencer (director) Is someone paying Wikipedia editors to exclude Carney from the public?
• 21:2321:23, 26 August 2013 diff hist +120 Sam Mendes I admit I haven't listened to the news today. Seriously, was Wikipedia purchased today by Sam Mendes, hence prohibiting any criticism whatsoever (even in the form of a minor link) of him? Is Wikipedia now an official Mendes hagiography?
• 21:2121:21, 26 August 2013 diff hist −1,760 User talk:109.186.234.86 I admit I haven't listened to the news today. Can you please direct me to the recent report about Wikipedia being purchased by Steven Spielberg, hence prohibiting any critical comments whatsoever (even in the form of a minor link) of Hollywood?
• 21:1921:19, 26 August 2013 diff hist +120 Sam Mendes Was Wikipedia recently purchased by some Hollywood tycoon? If not, why can't it accept a link to some critical comments about some Hollywood director written by a leading academic scholar?
• 21:1821:18, 26 August 2013 diff hist +123 Jane Spencer (director) Undid revision 570313447 by Insulam Simia (talk) Again, why does Wikipedia fear Carney so much? I haven't heard it was purchased by Hollywood...
• 21:1821:18, 26 August 2013 diff hist +233 John Cassavetes Undid revision 570313499 by Insulam Simia (talk) Again, why does Wikipedia seem to piss in its pants every time Carney is mentioned? Corporate interests?
• 21:1821:18, 26 August 2013 diff hist +122 Paul Thomas Anderson Undid revision 570313502 by Insulam Simia (talk) Why are you so afraid of some critical commentary about PTA from a leading critic?
• 21:1721:17, 26 August 2013 diff hist +95 Husbands (film) Undid revision 570313317 by Insulam Simia (talk) Given that Carney is the world's foremost Cassavetes authority, may I ask why?
• 21:1521:15, 26 August 2013 diff hist −2,747 User talk:109.186.234.86 Wikipedia is not a commercial for Hollywood blockbusters and there is no reason whatsoever to prevent critical comments from appearing here!
• 21:1421:14, 26 August 2013 diff hist +258 Saving Private Ryan Undid revision 570313406 by Insulam Simia (talk) Can anyone please tell me why Wikipedia is so hostile to even mentioning Carney?
• 21:1321:13, 26 August 2013 diff hist +258 Saving Private Ryan Undid revision 570312049 by Insulam Simia (talk) Why?
• 21:1221:12, 26 August 2013 diff hist −2,507 User talk:109.186.234.86 That editor just mentioned the Variety article rather than embedding it in the text. Also, why is Wikipedia so hostile to even mentioning Carney's name in articles? I don't think Wikipedia's stated goail is to be some giant commercial for Hollywood flicks
• 21:1021:10, 26 August 2013 diff hist +120 Sam Mendes Undid revision 570312093 by Insulam Simia (talk) Why?
• 21:1021:10, 26 August 2013 diff hist +111 Woody Allen Undid revision 570312345 by Insulam Simia (talk) And that is why? Are you a Carney-hater/Hollywood admirer too?
• 21:1021:10, 26 August 2013 diff hist +95 Husbands (film) Undid revision 570312459 by Insulam Simia (talk) And that is why?
• 21:0821:08, 26 August 2013 diff hist −205 Karl Riedl Undid revision 570312552 by Insulam Simia (talk) And that is why?
• 21:0821:08, 26 August 2013 diff hist +123 Jane Spencer (director) Undid revision 570311320 by Binksternet (talk) Right, its the title of a lecture he gave to some high school and which is available on his web site
• 21:0721:07, 26 August 2013 diff hist +123 Wes Anderson Undid revision 570311596 by Binksternet (talk) You seem to ignore my arguments out of some hostility to Carney or prehaprs to the whole notion of film as art
• 21:0721:07, 26 August 2013 diff hist +122 Paul Thomas Anderson Undid revision 570311692 by Binksternet (talk) You seem to ignore my arguments out of some hostility to Carney or prehaprs to the whole notion of film as art
• 21:0621:06, 26 August 2013 diff hist +233 John Cassavetes Undid revision 570311556 by Binksternet (talk) You seem to ignore my arguments out of some hostility to Carney or prehaprs to the whole notion of film as art
• 21:0521:05, 26 August 2013 diff hist −205 Karl Riedl Undid revision 570311762 by Binksternet (talk) Just add a reference (this is what we're supposed to do here on Wiki, right?)...
• 21:0421:04, 26 August 2013 diff hist +95 Husbands (film) Undid revision 570311841 by Binksternet (talk) You seem to ignore my arguments out of some hostility to Carney or prehaprs to the whole notion of film as art
• 21:0221:02, 26 August 2013 diff hist +111 Woody Allen –Excerpted from: "Modernism for the Millions: The Films of Woody Allen," The Alaska Quarterly Review, Vol. 8, No. 1 and 2 (Fall and Winter 1989), pp. 139-169. Not some promotional link but a scholarly reference. Why are you so hostile to Carney?
• 21:0021:00, 26 August 2013 diff hist +120 Sam Mendes It gives an important counter view to all the hagiography usually found in Wikipedia articles dealing with Hollywood directors. Do you have anything against Carney or his ideas? Tag: repeated addition of external links by non-autoconfirmed user
• 20:5820:58, 26 August 2013 diff hist +258 Saving Private Ryan He means, in that comment, that this flick does not have any artistic merit. It gives an important counter-view to all the hagiography usually found in Wikipedia articles dealing with Hollywood blockbuster flicks
• 20:5820:58, 26 August 2013 diff hist −205 Karl Riedl Undid revision 570305253 by Binksternet (talk) If so, please kindly add a reference. Until then, please don't refer to it as such
• 20:5620:56, 26 August 2013 diff hist +122 Paul Thomas Anderson Undid revision 570302753 by Binksternet (talk) It gives an important counter-view to all the hagiography usually found in Wikipedia articles dealing with Hollywood directors
• 20:5520:55, 26 August 2013 diff hist +123 Wes Anderson Undid revision 570311024 by Binksternet (talk) It gives an important counter-opinion to all the hagiography usually found in Wikipedia articles dealing with Hollywood directors
• 20:5220:52, 26 August 2013 diff hist +120 Jane Spencer (director) Undid revision 570310473 by Binksternet (talk) Why do you insist on removing Carney's name from every article?
• 20:5120:51, 26 August 2013 diff hist +111 Woody Allen Undid revision 570310142 by Binksternet (talk) This is not some "promotional link" but a reprint of one of Carney's scholarly papers (originally published in an academic journal)
• 20:5120:51, 26 August 2013 diff hist +233 John Cassavetes Seems to be an excerpt from published work
• 20:4820:48, 26 August 2013 diff hist +95 Husbands (film) Undid revision 570309980 by Binksternet (talk) Seems to be an excerpt from a published work rather than some random link
• 20:4320:43, 26 August 2013 diff hist −148 Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom →Cast: Removed nonexistent character
• 19:1319:13, 26 August 2013 diff hist +23 Walter Benjamin →Works