Neslihan Şenocak
 |
Neslihan Şenocak | |
|---|---|
| Born | c. 1976 |
| Nationality | Turk |
| Citizenship | Turk |
| Alma mater | Bilkent University |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Historian Medieval History |
| Institutions | Bilkent University, Columbia University, Eastern Mediterranean University, University of Notre Dame, University of Toronto |
| Doctoral advisor | Paul Latimer |
Neslihan Şenocak (born in İzmir, c. 1976) is a Turkish historian, and instructor at Bilkent University, Ankara and at Columbia University in the city of New York.
Career
[edit]Her work examines medieval religious orders and the daily life in the thirteenth-century Italy, and her most recent project is on the relationship of violent crimes and urbanization in 13th-century Perugia.
She is the author of several articles, as well as numerous book reviews. These works have been cited about 90 times in the academic literature.[1]
Selected works
[edit]Articles
[edit]- "Circulation of Books in the Medieval Franciscan Order: Attitude, Methods, and Critics" in the Journal of Religious History, 2004,[2]
- "Book Acquisition in the Medieval Franciscan Order", Journal of Religious History, 2003,[3]
- "The Franciscan Order and Natural Philosophy in the Thirteenth Century: A Relationship Redefined" in Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, (Ecotheology 7.2) January 2003,[4]
- "Early Fourteenth-Century Franciscan Library Catalogues" in Scriptorium, Vol. 59, Nº. 1, 2005, pags. 29-50,[5]
References
[edit]- ^ "Google Scholar".
- ^ Senocak, Neslihan (2004). "Circulation of Books in the Medieval Franciscan Order: Attitude, Methods, and Critics". Journal of Religious History. 28 (2): 146–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9809.2004.00210.x.
- ^ Book Acquisition in the Medieval Franciscan Order
- ^ "abstract". Archived from the original on 12 March 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2010.
- ^ Senocak, Neslihan (2005). "Early Fourteenth-Century Franciscan Library Catalogues: The Case of the Gubbio Catalogue (C. 1300)". Scriptorium: Revue Internationale des Études Relatives Aux Manuscrits. 59 (1): 29–50.
