User talk:Telex80
|
ARCHIVES
The article Lady Zu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of any notability. No evidence that released songs ever charted at any significant level. The two sources both appear to have been generated from the same press release. Identical photos and broadly comparable text. Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Velella Velella Talk 21:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Jana Agoncillo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Agoncillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Agoncillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 21:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Proinnsías Ó Duinn (December 4)
- Draft:Proinnsías Ó Duinn may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Telex80!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Copyright problem: Draft:Proinnsías Ó Duinn
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Proinnsías Ó Duinn, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.musicintervals.com, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Proinnsías Ó Duinn and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Proinnsías Ó Duinn, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Proinnsías Ó Duinn. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Proinnsías Ó Duinn with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Proinnsías Ó Duinn saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Eurovision backgrounds
Hi. Before you add more information on the Eurovision backgrounds, can you please take part in the conversation we are having about them? Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Eurovision#"Spokesperson_background"_column. Grk1011 (talk) 16:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Manila Bulletin New Logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Manila Bulletin New Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Philippine Daily Inquirer Front Page (December 11, 2019).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Philippine Daily Inquirer Front Page (December 11, 2019).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jüri Aarma
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jüri Aarma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Telex80, and welcome to Women in Red. Glad to see you are interested in contributing more articles about women. You might find it helpful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
.jpg){kind=link}
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ambassadors of New Zealand to the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Strachan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Hungry Syrian Wanderer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hungry Syrian Wanderer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hungry Syrian Wanderer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. hueman1 (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Ways to improve Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 28)
Hello, Telex80,
Thank you for creating Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 28).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
References need to be added for verification
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jmertel23}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Jmertel23 (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Hungry Syrian Wanderer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hungry Syrian Wanderer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hungry Syrian Wanderer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SoWhy 08:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ken San Jose, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Ken San Jose, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 1) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 1), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 24) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 24), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Reichsstudentenführer moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Reichsstudentenführer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mistletoe (Justin Bieber song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Last Summer (Johnny Orlando).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Last Summer (Johnny Orlando).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Phobiasjohnnyo2020.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Phobiasjohnnyo2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:See You (Johnny Orlando).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:See You (Johnny Orlando).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 1)
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maalaala Mo Kaya".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Maalaala Mo Kaya (season 24)
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maalaala Mo Kaya".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Junk Journal
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Junk Journal".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Itsneverreallyover20.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Itsneverreallyover20.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paano ang Pangako? (January 5)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paano ang Pangako? and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paano ang Pangako?, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Adding categories about keys songs are composed in
Hi. Just so you know, this information should be sourced in the prose of the article before adding it as a category. Even if this information is factual, it needs to be cited in the article before it can be added as a category. It is not readily apparent to most readers, and by extension most editors, which key a piece of music is composed in unless they have experience with musical composition, so it can be considered contentious material. Please consider undoing these edits you have made, and not making them in future unless there is accompanying prose stating the song was composed in that key. All information should be sourced in the prose before adding a category stating so per WP:V. Thank you. Ss112 04:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, the prose of 7 Years (Lukas Graham song) already states the article is written in G minor (not B major). This is why there needs to be sourcing, because it's clearly contentious material. I hope you can see this going forward. Ss112 04:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ruel as long as you care.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ruel as long as you care.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Reichsstudentenführer
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reichsstudentenführer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Monthly death pages
Thanks for moving the entries from the annual page to Deaths in March 2021. However, most entries in the monthly ones follow the TOC chronology from the first day of the month to the last and not in the same order as the annual page. Thanks. Wyliepedia @ 21:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ina, Kapatid, Anak (film)
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ina, Kapatid, Anak (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Estonian Advertising Film moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Estonian Advertising Film, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
OTI Festival 1981 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, OTI Festival 1981, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The article 1992 in Kazakhstan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As-is, so little content to be useless as a list.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:National anthem compositions in B minor indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:King Clavas
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King Clavas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Statue of King Albert I, Brussels (June 22)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Statue of King Albert I, Brussels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Statue of King Albert I, Brussels, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Coat of Arms of Vladikavkaz moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Coat of Arms of Vladikavkaz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 23:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
List of programs aired by CNN Philippines moved to draftspace
I've moved your article List of programs aired by CNN Philippines to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 07:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:King Clavas
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "King Clavas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by ETC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Draftifying articles
Hello, Telex80,
If you move another article to Draft space, please tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2, which we use for cross-space redirects from main space. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 01:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Estonian Advertising Film
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Estonian Advertising Film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Nicaraguan Army
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicaraguan Army, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:OTI Festival 1981
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OTI Festival 1981, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your edits are hurting the encyclopedia
Hi Telex80 - I'm a volunteer at the help desk, and another editor posted there that your edits show a limited command of the English language. For example, this edit [[1]] introduced a section of text that makes no sense. Since adding poorly written content only degrades the encyclopedia and makes more cleanup work for others, I'd like to kindly ask that you refrain from editing English language articles for the time being. If your native language is Tagalog, I strongly recommend you instead focus on articles at [[2]]. Thank you for understanding. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
I usually understand that Telex80 (talk) 00:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Concern regarding Draft:Coat of Arms of Vladikavkaz
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coat of Arms of Vladikavkaz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:List of programs aired by CNN Philippines
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of programs aired by CNN Philippines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Valentina Ploy
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valentina Ploy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Statue of Albert I, Brussels
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Statue of Albert I, Brussels, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Kharis Suhud
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kharis Suhud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of programs aired by CNN Philippines
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of programs aired by CNN Philippines".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Muistathan.png
Thanks for uploading File:Muistathan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lapponia Ami Aspelund.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lapponia Ami Aspelund.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GA reviews
Hey there. Thanks for reviewing my three Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest articles, but I'm a bit concerned about whether the reviews were done properly. One of them took less than 30 minutes and two of them took less that 15 minutes combined. No suggestions or edits were offered and I'm not even sure you would have enough time to read all of the text and all of the sources that quickly. They weren't my first ever GAs and I'm sure they were pretty good, but I doubt they were perfect at first read. In my experience, the reviews have taken hours to days to complete, for example Talk:San_Marino_in_the_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2018#GA_Review. Are you confident that these were done properly? Grk1011 (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Grk1011, all three passes have been reverted and the reviews reopened—see WT:GAN for the discussion there. Telex80, I hope we see you there to discuss how to proceed from here. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Telex80, it's been over a week. While you've been editing elsewhere rather than responding, the discussion on the GAN talk page has been archived. If we do not hear from you here or there within 24 hours of your next edit, we'll assume that you have decided not to edit further on the GA reviews you opened where your passes were reverted, and proceed without your participation. Thank you for your interest in the GA process. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.82.132.213.17 (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 10:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)April 2022
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Chip3004 (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Reichsstudentenführer
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reichsstudentenführer".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Judith Osborn moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Judith Osborn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicaraguan Army (August 1)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicaraguan Army and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Christian Lalama moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Christian Lalama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Malerooster (talk) 20:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Judith Osborn
Hello, Telex80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Judith Osborn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Judith Osborn
Hello, Telex80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judith Osborn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Unblock appeal
Telex80 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
01. I already cited first about the Kazakh Entrant David Charlin in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2022, but it said it's very closely pasted as an incident before the competition is held (usually finding the source for this is not found somewhere on the web but claimed by several people whom believe which is fully true and formal on Twitrer by some Ukrainians opposed to Russia : https://twitter.com/monmarancy/status/1594562535323492352?t=KEISrQ1ZLVx62gYY-zGgSA&s=19 (IN UKRAINAN) And in ESC.UA site claiming the story (archived ) : https://archive.org/details/screenshot-20221116-005409-instagram (IN UKRAINIAN)
At this point I really says this will passed it's quality of my point but claiming which is useless by the way..
02. The postcatd films are sourced properly, and my grammar and punctuation are moderately okay for thay point but any of the postcard videos produced in the 20th year of Junior Eurovision Song Contest and some of the citations for the postcard videos are content-based on visual view which accurately source from YouTube and identified accourding to it's style and not to tolerate as "disruptive" some of the articles are concisely cited are from 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021
My Edit :
03. The article about the Philippine Patriotic Oath (Filipino : Panatang Makabayan) which I've transcribed truly from a TV show segment produced by Philippine media company ABS-CBN way back 2004, and uploaded it to YouTube it is proven that the stated facts are legitimate and not biased
Source to the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9KHcxFODug (in Tagalog)
04. The chaplet praying of the Divine Mercy was a long way history in tradition from the Polish and American versions of the prayer, and it's a clue that some of the Live Stream videos in Polish have variaties upon them but even I looked upon it, both sources I've pitting this are dismatch rather than original from each other, and it's very unverificable on this point and I've once forgot to revert it because it's too inaine.
Sources :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgE9rrnTiI (in Polish) https://diecezja.pl/kult-bozego-milosierdzia/koronka-do-bozego-milosierdzia/ (In polish)
My written bits :
And my appeal of my block concern, is stated that I have a "language barrier issue" regarding for my speaking peferences which stated in my block notice, I had a strong passion on enpowering my pure english skills here on English Wikipedia. But my edits since 2017 are long way verified. And even since I learned comprehensive editing to stamped out as reliable to add in English Wikipedia and I'm not a disruptive user who wanted to clear on the missing details on each article and so on and not to embraced on plagerising into form of some attitude.
And this made me nonsense, that the user quote me "They have been adding garbage like that to articles since 2017" the FACT that I not do anything to made it rubblish ever since I created this account since 2017, and after 5 years and counting I'm in a good shape despite of slump statements written on some articles I've edited.
Regards,
Telex80 (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have efforts on updating and doing comprehensively to some articles which have a good factor for citing it, but as must as I do that my edits are accurate and not originally sourced or make-up, but I must say that I'd cited to the articles in relation for some point and here is the thing that I've perfectly cited and not dismatching it's POV (point of view) by the following : 01. I already cited first about the Kazakh Entrant David Charlin in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2022, but it said it's very closely pasted as an incident before the competition is held (usually finding the source for this is not found somewhere on the web but claimed by several people whom believe which is fully true and formal on Twitrer by some Ukrainians opposed to Russia : https://twitter.com/monmarancy/status/1594562535323492352?t=KEISrQ1ZLVx62gYY-zGgSA&s=19 (IN UKRAINAN) And in ESC.UA site claiming the story (archived ) : https://archive.org/details/screenshot-20221116-005409-instagram (IN UKRAINIAN) My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 At this point I really says this will passed it's quality of my point but claiming which is useless by the way.. 02. The postcatd films are sourced properly, and my grammar and punctuation are moderately okay for thay point but any of the postcard videos produced in the 20th year of Junior Eurovision Song Contest and some of the citations for the postcard videos are content-based on visual view which accurately source from YouTube and identified accourding to it's style and not to tolerate as "disruptive" some of the articles are concisely cited are from 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 03. The article about the Philippine Patriotic Oath (Filipino : ''Panatang Makabayan'') which I've transcribed truly from a TV show segment produced by Philippine media company ABS-CBN way back 2004, and uploaded it to YouTube it is proven that the stated facts are legitimate and not biased Source to the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9KHcxFODug (in Tagalog) 04. The chaplet praying of the Divine Mercy was a long way history in tradition from the Polish and American versions of the prayer, and it's a clue that some of the Live Stream videos in Polish have variaties upon them but even I looked upon it, both sources I've pitting this are dismatch rather than original from each other, and it's very unverificable on this point and I've once forgot to revert it because it's too inaine. Sources : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgE9rrnTiI (in Polish) https://diecezja.pl/kult-bozego-milosierdzia/koronka-do-bozego-milosierdzia/ (In polish) My written bits : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaplet_of_the_Divine_Mercy&diff=prev&oldid=1124303088 And my appeal of my block concern, is stated that I have a "language barrier issue" regarding for my speaking peferences which stated in my block notice, I had a strong passion on enpowering my pure english skills here on English Wikipedia. But my edits since 2017 are long way verified. And even since I learned comprehensive editing to stamped out as reliable to add in English Wikipedia and I'm not a disruptive user who wanted to clear on the missing details on each article and so on and not to embraced on plagerising into form of some attitude. And this made me nonsense, that the user quote me "They have been adding garbage like that to articles since 2017" the FACT that I not do anything to made it rubblish ever since I created this account since 2017, and after 5 years and counting I'm in a good shape despite of slump statements written on some articles I've edited. Regards, [[User:Telex80|Telex80]] ([[User talk:Telex80#top|talk]]) 16:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have efforts on updating and doing comprehensively to some articles which have a good factor for citing it, but as must as I do that my edits are accurate and not originally sourced or make-up, but I must say that I'd cited to the articles in relation for some point and here is the thing that I've perfectly cited and not dismatching it's POV (point of view) by the following : 01. I already cited first about the Kazakh Entrant David Charlin in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2022, but it said it's very closely pasted as an incident before the competition is held (usually finding the source for this is not found somewhere on the web but claimed by several people whom believe which is fully true and formal on Twitrer by some Ukrainians opposed to Russia : https://twitter.com/monmarancy/status/1594562535323492352?t=KEISrQ1ZLVx62gYY-zGgSA&s=19 (IN UKRAINAN) And in ESC.UA site claiming the story (archived ) : https://archive.org/details/screenshot-20221116-005409-instagram (IN UKRAINIAN) My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 At this point I really says this will passed it's quality of my point but claiming which is useless by the way.. 02. The postcatd films are sourced properly, and my grammar and punctuation are moderately okay for thay point but any of the postcard videos produced in the 20th year of Junior Eurovision Song Contest and some of the citations for the postcard videos are content-based on visual view which accurately source from YouTube and identified accourding to it's style and not to tolerate as "disruptive" some of the articles are concisely cited are from 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 03. The article about the Philippine Patriotic Oath (Filipino : ''Panatang Makabayan'') which I've transcribed truly from a TV show segment produced by Philippine media company ABS-CBN way back 2004, and uploaded it to YouTube it is proven that the stated facts are legitimate and not biased Source to the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9KHcxFODug (in Tagalog) 04. The chaplet praying of the Divine Mercy was a long way history in tradition from the Polish and American versions of the prayer, and it's a clue that some of the Live Stream videos in Polish have variaties upon them but even I looked upon it, both sources I've pitting this are dismatch rather than original from each other, and it's very unverificable on this point and I've once forgot to revert it because it's too inaine. Sources : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgE9rrnTiI (in Polish) https://diecezja.pl/kult-bozego-milosierdzia/koronka-do-bozego-milosierdzia/ (In polish) My written bits : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaplet_of_the_Divine_Mercy&diff=prev&oldid=1124303088 And my appeal of my block concern, is stated that I have a "language barrier issue" regarding for my speaking peferences which stated in my block notice, I had a strong passion on enpowering my pure english skills here on English Wikipedia. But my edits since 2017 are long way verified. And even since I learned comprehensive editing to stamped out as reliable to add in English Wikipedia and I'm not a disruptive user who wanted to clear on the missing details on each article and so on and not to embraced on plagerising into form of some attitude. And this made me nonsense, that the user quote me "They have been adding garbage like that to articles since 2017" the FACT that I not do anything to made it rubblish ever since I created this account since 2017, and after 5 years and counting I'm in a good shape despite of slump statements written on some articles I've edited. Regards, [[User:Telex80|Telex80]] ([[User talk:Telex80#top|talk]]) 16:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have efforts on updating and doing comprehensively to some articles which have a good factor for citing it, but as must as I do that my edits are accurate and not originally sourced or make-up, but I must say that I'd cited to the articles in relation for some point and here is the thing that I've perfectly cited and not dismatching it's POV (point of view) by the following : 01. I already cited first about the Kazakh Entrant David Charlin in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2022, but it said it's very closely pasted as an incident before the competition is held (usually finding the source for this is not found somewhere on the web but claimed by several people whom believe which is fully true and formal on Twitrer by some Ukrainians opposed to Russia : https://twitter.com/monmarancy/status/1594562535323492352?t=KEISrQ1ZLVx62gYY-zGgSA&s=19 (IN UKRAINAN) And in ESC.UA site claiming the story (archived ) : https://archive.org/details/screenshot-20221116-005409-instagram (IN UKRAINIAN) My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 At this point I really says this will passed it's quality of my point but claiming which is useless by the way.. 02. The postcatd films are sourced properly, and my grammar and punctuation are moderately okay for thay point but any of the postcard videos produced in the 20th year of Junior Eurovision Song Contest and some of the citations for the postcard videos are content-based on visual view which accurately source from YouTube and identified accourding to it's style and not to tolerate as "disruptive" some of the articles are concisely cited are from 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 My Edit : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junior_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2022&diff=prev&oldid=1127311758 03. The article about the Philippine Patriotic Oath (Filipino : ''Panatang Makabayan'') which I've transcribed truly from a TV show segment produced by Philippine media company ABS-CBN way back 2004, and uploaded it to YouTube it is proven that the stated facts are legitimate and not biased Source to the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9KHcxFODug (in Tagalog) 04. The chaplet praying of the Divine Mercy was a long way history in tradition from the Polish and American versions of the prayer, and it's a clue that some of the Live Stream videos in Polish have variaties upon them but even I looked upon it, both sources I've pitting this are dismatch rather than original from each other, and it's very unverificable on this point and I've once forgot to revert it because it's too inaine. Sources : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPgE9rrnTiI (in Polish) https://diecezja.pl/kult-bozego-milosierdzia/koronka-do-bozego-milosierdzia/ (In polish) My written bits : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaplet_of_the_Divine_Mercy&diff=prev&oldid=1124303088 And my appeal of my block concern, is stated that I have a "language barrier issue" regarding for my speaking peferences which stated in my block notice, I had a strong passion on enpowering my pure english skills here on English Wikipedia. But my edits since 2017 are long way verified. And even since I learned comprehensive editing to stamped out as reliable to add in English Wikipedia and I'm not a disruptive user who wanted to clear on the missing details on each article and so on and not to embraced on plagerising into form of some attitude. And this made me nonsense, that the user quote me "They have been adding garbage like that to articles since 2017" the FACT that I not do anything to made it rubblish ever since I created this account since 2017, and after 5 years and counting I'm in a good shape despite of slump statements written on some articles I've edited. Regards, [[User:Telex80|Telex80]] ([[User talk:Telex80#top|talk]]) 16:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Okay, so I'm looking at an unblock request.
- Its first sentence currently reads as follows: "I have efforts on updating and doing comprehensively to some articles which have a good factors for citing it, but as must as i do that my edits are accurate and not originally sourced or make-up, but I must say that I'd cited to the articles in relation for some point and here is the thing that I've perfectly cited and not dismatching it's POV (point of view) to it's following"
- English is not my native language and you claim to be a native speaker on your user page, so I may not be in the best position to criticize this. Or perhaps I'm in the best position to do so. My problem is that I genuinely do not understand what you are trying to say.
- I start reading the sentence: "I have efforts on updating and doing comprehensively to some articles"... "Doing to articles"? "Hello friend, today I have done comprehensively to an article"?
- And this is where I'd normally stop trying. Perhaps I try once more by skipping the strange part of the sentence. "Articles which have a good factors for citing it". Sorry? Are you trying to say "Articles which need citations?" Why "a factors"? One shoes, one cats, one articles? "A" is singular, "-s" is plural. You randomly mix these.
- I have to give up at this point.
- Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)- By the way, I usually a bit problematic with my first sentences because in terms of my mistake on marked as 'disruptive editing' on my 3 or more edit under question here in English Wikipedia. But I'll try to correct this as much as I can. Telex80 (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- "I usually a bit problematic". Telex80, you're applying for the ability to build an English encyclopedia. I'd ask "why?", but I'm afraid I wouldn't understand the answer. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- To be honest, my consideration for ensuring my good faith in editing and I hadn't do wrong depsite my creditbility for citing sources correctly and not to be disabide. Also, in this dispute on my appeal to be unblock that I followed guidelines per WP:Notability to be sure that I must follow here. Telex80 (talk) 19:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- I recommend that you edit the Wikipedia version for your native language. Your English prose is almost incomprehensible. Cullen328 (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- I know, but I'll make it this way because I actually Asian and know english is very much in common about in familiarising. Telex80 (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- And let me try if my prose in English is accurate in order for lifting my block, Here is my sample sentences to be written on article
- ARTICLE : Patriotic Oath (Philippines)
- Summary :
- The original verison was originally witten in English penned in 1935 by the instruction of the Education Secreatariat in order on emphasize the means of a true patriotism and love for god, country, and life. in 1955 which was later translated in Filipino by Benjamin Trinidad and the Education Board of Councilors in order to "move closely on what the panatá is associated on the roots of true Nationalism and Giving it near on the hustle of Pinoy culture since Independence. Telex80 (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- I know, but I'll make it this way because I actually Asian and know english is very much in common about in familiarising. Telex80 (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- I recommend that you edit the Wikipedia version for your native language. Your English prose is almost incomprehensible. Cullen328 (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- To be honest, my consideration for ensuring my good faith in editing and I hadn't do wrong depsite my creditbility for citing sources correctly and not to be disabide. Also, in this dispute on my appeal to be unblock that I followed guidelines per WP:Notability to be sure that I must follow here. Telex80 (talk) 19:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- "I usually a bit problematic". Telex80, you're applying for the ability to build an English encyclopedia. I'd ask "why?", but I'm afraid I wouldn't understand the answer. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, I usually a bit problematic with my first sentences because in terms of my mistake on marked as 'disruptive editing' on my 3 or more edit under question here in English Wikipedia. But I'll try to correct this as much as I can. Telex80 (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging