User talk:Ranze

This user is a participant in WikiProject Professional wrestling.

This user is a member of
WikiProject Tokusatsu

Archives: /2012, /2013, /2014, /2015, /2016, /2017, /2018

diffs: Special:Diff/1

Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal for later

AMAs/Reddit https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/02/

Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance also is interesting for avoiding premature speedy deletion nominations

Wikipedia:REFILL looks very useful for times when I can only post bare URLs due to editing via a crappy tablet.

Sourcing: Template:Find sources + WP:RS + Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard +Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#List +Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources aka WP:PW/RS

old Teletoon air dates: ftp://support.crtc.gc.ca/logs/ or http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/800106c1-0b08-401e-8be2-ac45d62e662e

redirects per special:diff/743903193 use Wikipedia:Article wizard/Redirect to post at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and log at user:ranze/redirects along with WP:RFD contributions. As clarified December 18 in special:diff/755529610 I can ping Thryduulf if there is a comment to add on RFD.

Orphaned non-free image File:GravityBoots1984augustArchie'sGirls331.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GravityBoots1984augustArchie'sGirls331.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

message to BBB

@Bbb23: first a public service inquiry here. At Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation you had posted:

{{User:Ranze}} blocked for 24 hours for violating WP:1RR in the MRM section of Controversial Reddit communities.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

• Your recent creation of a userpage for me has resulted in the category you've added to my userpage also being added to that talk page. I don't know if it might be possible to add a "noinclude" or full colon prior to the username to prevent that category transclusion disrupting the page?

Second: I noticed special:diff/863739039 and how User:RatatoskJones linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tyciol/Archive#12_July_2018 and am trying to understand why you are being more assertive in adding me to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tyciol whereas you merely added User:ScratchMarshall to Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tyciol. I acknowledge that you have suspicions based on interest overlap (is it uncommon for WWE fans to like weightlifting?) but I think it is useful to be more apprehensive about leaping to conclusions like this. What is the basis of your "proven"?

I appeal to you that I do not deserve to be blocked, as I am innocent and a good-willed Wikipedia contributor. Ranze (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Witch girl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Witch girl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch girl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Linda Lusk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Lusk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Lusk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

"Phodes" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phodes. Since you had some involvement with the Phodes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of L.O.S.E.R.S.

The article L.O.S.E.R.S. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a disambiguation page, both partial-title matches for redirects. Unsure if this minor fictional element should be merged into List of The Fairly OddParents characters or not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 8chan (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 8chan (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8chan (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geolodus (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

"Lillian Gay" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lillian Gay. Since you had some involvement with the Lillian Gay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 02:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)