Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RD: Jane Birkin: Oppose blurb
Line 53: Line 53:


:'''Support once ready''' As stated the article is a WIP, but in principle the matter is absolutely one that should be represented. It feels like every week new heat records are broken somewhere in the world, it's a subject that is absolutely dominating regional and international news cycles. Seems to fit ITN's purpose well enough. [[User:BSMRD|BSMRD]] ([[User talk:BSMRD|talk]]) 19:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
:'''Support once ready''' As stated the article is a WIP, but in principle the matter is absolutely one that should be represented. It feels like every week new heat records are broken somewhere in the world, it's a subject that is absolutely dominating regional and international news cycles. Seems to fit ITN's purpose well enough. [[User:BSMRD|BSMRD]] ([[User talk:BSMRD|talk]]) 19:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/16/thousands-forced-out-of-homes-la-palma-canary-islands-as-heatwave-grips-europe The European Space Agency (ESA) said the next week could bring the hottest temperatures ever recorded in Europe]. [[User:Count Iblis|Count Iblis]] ([[User talk:Count Iblis|talk]]) 19:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


==== RD: Jane Birkin ====
==== RD: Jane Birkin ====

Revision as of 19:48, 16 July 2023

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Justin Welby in 2019
Justin Welby

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives


July 16

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


Wimbledon 2023

Proposed image
Articles: 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Women's singles (talk · history · tag) and 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In tennis, Markéta Vondroušová and Carlos Alcaraz (players pictured) win the women's and men's singles respectively at the Wimbledon Championships. (Post)
News source(s): NYT - The Guardian - The Independent
Credits:
Both articles updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: All three articles need improvements regarding quality (i.e, table walls [surprise]). — Knightoftheswords 18:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose DJOKOVIC IS THE GOAT!!! ALCARAZ COULD NEVER WIN FROM HIM!!!!
Just kidding, still opposing for now though due to page quality concerns. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 19:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing: Nahel Merzouk unrest

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Nahel Merzouk protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian - France24 - WaPo - Fox - DW
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The blurb has fallen off with the recent wave of postings, but is still ongoing and receiving mainstream coverage, with the article still receiving daily updates. — Knightoftheswords 18:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing documented past July 10 on our article, and as I understand it, the protests no longer have the scale that the original posting merited. Masem (t) 18:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Luigi Bettazzi

Article: Luigi Bettazzi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.avvenire.it/amp/av/pagine/monsignor-luigi-bettazzi
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian prelate. Article looks to be nearly ready though may need some work. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing: 2023 heatwaves

Article: 2023 heat waves (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian - NBC - VOA - NYT - NYT (again)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Long time no see ITN! Glad to see that we aren't set to have severa; ITN items be on the main page for a month. Since April, we've continually had nominations regarding heatwaves, be it the three noms for Asia, the North American for June, or the recent Europe nom. An argument that often gets made is that the whole world is experiencing a heatwave, which spurred an idea amongst some: what if we nominated a general article encompassing the whole globe for ongoing? The subject article itself needs serious cleaning up, but I'll work on the article now that I'm done with exams. — Knightoftheswords 14:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

52.2°C in northwest China (125.96°F/126.0). Absolutely destroying the world record for 40.000000+° from the Equator (and China's record) by 1.5C (2.7F). If it was c. 2.137551° norther it would've destroyed Earth's record for closer to pole than equator by 2.6C/4.7F (Canada 2021). Turpan City population hundreds of thousands new record over 49C/120F @ c. 42.93°N. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 14:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a source for 52.2°C in China? I saw a few mentions on Twitter but I can't find any articles and the Chinese weather websites have 48.7°C as the maximum. I'm trying to find a RS. Johndavies837 (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yale Climate Connections (the university not the door lock) should have an article on the extreme weather in hours, days at worst. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article would be good to cover the record temperatures ITNC from earlier this week as well. However, the article is far from being ready for posting. There absolutely needs to be a section on the metrological reasons for the heat wave and the connection to global warming issues that have been seen, and not just reporting of high temperatures in a proseline approach. --Masem (t) 14:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle, oppose on quality Article still needs work depth wise and also generally improved writing. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 14:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historic event. --Travisthecrab (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support once ready As stated the article is a WIP, but in principle the matter is absolutely one that should be represented. It feels like every week new heat records are broken somewhere in the world, it's a subject that is absolutely dominating regional and international news cycles. Seems to fit ITN's purpose well enough. BSMRD (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jane Birkin

Proposed image
Article: Jane Birkin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Anglo-French singer and actress Jane Birkin (pictured) dies at age 76. (Post)
News source(s): Sky News The Independent
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English-French singer. Article is in good shape. TwistedAxe [contact] 12:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Article is nearly there but filmography and discography need citations. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 12:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Talented actress, article looks in good shape, esp once remaining refs filled in. Am adding some references. --2001:BB6:4E52:7D00:AC64:A20D:AAB6:7877 (talk) 12:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blurb Per Macron and others, she was an icon that transcended generations. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, just no. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't handwave assertions of such importance - they need to be in the article first and foremost before we can consider blurbs based on that. Masem (t) 17:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I cited a good source which seems both reliable and respectable. The opposition just seems to be based on their personal opinion, which is otherwise. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • No blurb Iconic in some ways yes, but her actual body of work is quite slim and certainly not transformative in any way. Black Kite (talk) 17:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • No blurb per Black Kite. Modest body of work and inspiring a handbag is not "transformative" or in any way meeting what should be stringent criteria for a blurb. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • No blurb and commented it out from the template, even. Maybe premature, but even among those who support the posting of actors and entertainers as blurbs, you will not find a consensus for this. Getting an OBE isn't enough. In addition, it's an unfortunate distraction from what should be a straightforward RD nom since we get cluttered with the usual !votes of "never heard of them" and "not famous enough" which, even as I engage in the practice, at times I feel can be somewhat callous. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 18:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb per Muboshgu. Labeling her as a fashion icon might be a bit overstated, as her influence primarily revolves around a single handbag (which bears her name and has since evolved into a status symbol, to be fair) rather than a more extensive and consistent impact on the industry. Mooonswimmer 19:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 15

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


RD: Derek Malcolm

Article: Derek Malcolm (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/jul/16/derek-malcolm-longtime-guardian-film-critic-dies-aged-91
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English film critic. Almost ready though could use a bit more expansion. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Billy MacMillan

Article: Billy MacMillan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.nj.com/devils/2023/07/devils-mourn-death-of-former-coach-billy-macmillan.html
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian hockey player. Almost ready but needs more citations. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Marie-Laure de Decker

Article: Marie-Laure de Decker (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): France 24
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French war photographer Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 South Korean floods

Article: 2023 South Korean floods (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A dam in North Chungcheong Province, South Korea overflows, leading to at least 33 deaths. (Post)
News source(s): AP News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Unusual high death count for a flooding in the region. The article might have to get significant amount of work since it is short. MarioJump83 (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - notable, unusually high amount of deaths. — Knightoftheswords 18:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Francisco Ibáñez Talavera

Article: Francisco Ibáñez Talavera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters ABC
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Spanish comic book artist and writer. Article looks fine except for an uncited “works” section. Scientia potentia est, -MonarchOfTerror(talk) 07:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 European heat waves

Article: 2023 European heat waves (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Heatwaves spread throughout the European continent, causing record-breaking temperatures. (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Gaining lots of news attention, likely to get more severe in the coming months. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose, as it is hot EVERYWHERE in the world, and we should be looking to post the record temp ITNC below. Masem (t) 22:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


Chandrayaan-3

Article: Chandrayaan-3 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ India has launched its third Moon mission, Chandrayaan-3, from spaceport in Andhra Pradesh. (Post)
News source(s): NY Times, TOI, Al Jazeera, BBC, CNN
Credits:

 Ainty Painty (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait We should wait until it has either landed or crashed. 2607:9880:2D28:108:B818:9A26:1F7B:43A (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article(s) appear to be in good shape, waiting until the craft does "xyz" is irrelevant to the existing coverage in the news -- something is going to happen to it, regardless. Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    waiting until the craft does "xyz" is irrelevant to the existing coverage in the news Yes, except that portion of the event is WP:ITN/R, specifically under the "Space Exploration" category: Arrival of spacecraft (to lunar orbit and beyond) at their destinations. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 13:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per @Kcmastrpc. Best of luck to ISRO! PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until 23 August per User:WaltCip 5.151.106.5 (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Respectfully, I don't see the significance here. This is already the third mission in this program alone, and at this point launching a craft to explore the moon is hardly new. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per DarkSide, after the 1st launch, the subsequent ones are generally not as notable. --Masem (t) 17:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, leaning toward Support - We should wait until this mission either succeeds or fails, either way, it would make for a great ITN title due to widespread media coverage. Editor 5426387 (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait This mission is going to have a result no matter what. Whether it succeeds or fails, only time can tell. It's better to post the full results instead, whether if its successful or crashes or something. TwistedAxe [contact] 18:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Point of order - If and when the spacecraft lands, it will be considered to have fulfilled the ITN/R criteria for arriving at lunar orbit and beyond. If this is simply not notable despite fulfilling this, we ought to have a conversation about amending this criteria yet again; or if we had come to a consensus, amending the page so that it reflects reality. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 19:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it is more that being an ITNR is not a 100% assurance of being posted (outside of quality or timing issues). There are reasonable exceptions when an ITNR is made, which in this case "this is the third time India has reached the moon, its not as unique as the first" would be a valid point. Masem (t) 19:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I can already hear the opposition to Artemis 3. After all, the US landed people on the moon six times before that, and we've got this discussion lined up as precedent. —Cryptic 04:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Tbf, Artemis III will be one of the most momentous events in human history, so it's a little bit different. But yeah, I agree. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    And that's fine, but if it starts to become a regular occurrence (i.e. if as Cryptic says, it's used to challenge the Artemis 3 landing) then we need to reconsider its existence as an WP:ITNR criteria or at least amend it to specify "This generally does not apply to missions repeating similar past flights made as part of a larger programme". Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Masem - (in all fairness, I am just seeking to understand): What about the part in ITN/R that states Items which are listed on this page are considered to have already satisfied the 'importance' criterion for inclusion on ITN, every time they occur. Seems completely counterintuitive to me to not post because its 'happened before'. Also FWIW as I stated below, this would be India's first successful soft-landing on the moon - not the third. Schwinnspeed (talk) 18:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a difference between assuming that the general ITNR topic meets the significance level so that we don't keep debating why that ITNR topic exists (this was common when we still had the Boat Race on there, the ITNC would question why do we even have that ITNR), and finding that one specific instance of an ITNR is significant, which is the case here. No one is questioning the launch or the arrival of space missions as an ITNR, just this particularly event. Masem (t) 12:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Renominate after landing (i.e., wait) The criteria at ITN/R (as Walt has stated) is to post upon on 'arrival' This criteria reflects several discussions that posed similar concerns about the significance of repeated space missions (ie previous consensus took this into account) Also, for what it's worth, if it lands, it will be the first successful soft-landing of a spacecraft on the lunar surface for India, only the 4th country to do so. Notable in my book. Schwinnspeed (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait If it makes India’s 1st successful landing, it’ll be notable enough to post. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, leaning support when it lands in late August this year. Arguments of DarkSide and Masem are equivalent to saying that Apollo 11 wasn't relevant enough after earlier Apollo missions. I don't think a success is the criteria here and this should be displayed irrespective of the mission outcome.>>> Extorc.talk 18:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If there was some significant new aspect of this 3rd mission - in comparison to Apollo 11 actually landing on the moon for the first time - then that would be reason to post this one. But as I understand the mission , the goals of this lander is not really as novel as previous missions. Masem (t) 19:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It has the same goal as the 2nd mission, but the outcome could be different. The 2nd mission didn’t land successfully. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Small launches like this happen weekly or at least monthly, if we start posting them all this whole page would be nothing but spess launches Daikido (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, lean Support only if it successfully lands. India successfully deploying a lander/rover on the moon is notable, a hypothetical failure like the second mission is not. The Kip (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's an interesting mission profile with a launch into earth orbit and then a process of raising the orbit until the leap to the moon. As this is happening now and is in the news now, we should post it now. The article could use some work but is already quite informative. The item which would be displaced by this is the Bolsonaro ban which is not so informative and is not in the news. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Article in reasonable shape, and a blurb highlights a mission to an area of the moon, the Lunar south pole, that is currently the focus of attention in coming years. Notable, and a significant source of pride for emerging space power India. Posting this now is a plus for the 'pedia: inclusive, of international interest, and timely. Opposes and "wait" !votes are unconvincing. Jusdafax (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until it successfully lands, then it's definitely in the news. Thought to nominate myself or at least get involved if it lands.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. I would support if it successfully deploys on the moon. Black Kite (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It's a notable event that's currently in the news. The article meets basic quality standards (though a few more citations wouldn't hurt). We can update the blurb if something else worth noting occurs. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Marilies Flemming

Article: Marilies Flemming (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Die Presse
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Austrian politician. - Indefensible (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet ready Not sufficiently holistic: big gap in content between her birth in 1933 and 1999, de.wiki article could be used as a baseline. Curbon7 (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) New York City Council veto override

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Eric Adams (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The New York City Council overrode Mayor Eric Adams' veto of legislation to expand housing voucher for homeless families and individuals, marking the first override since the administration of Michael Bloomberg (Post)
News source(s): https://citylimits.org/2023/07/13/nyc-council-overrides-veto-to-expand-rental-vouchers/
Credits:
Nominator's comments: This is a major political event in NYC and could shape Adams' mayoralty going forward. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed, posted) 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United States, Hollywood actors in SAG-AFTRA join writers in a strike following failed negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the United States, actors in the SAG-AFTRA trade union go on strike, joining writers in the Writers Guild of America strike.
News source(s): CNBC, NYT
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: Fine, Walt; it's just a bunch of rich people striking in the USA because they want more money from other rich people. Yes, this is so, but this effectively cripples the entire digital entertainment industry in the USA. Never since 1960 has there been a shutdown of this magnitude. I believe the impact for this is going to be large; even if it's not a disaster in the sense of killing people, it's still very broad and has implications for the entire industry. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 20:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification, I've amended the article in the template. I wanted to get the nomination up rather quickly and then fix it later, so it was a bit sloppy to start with. I'm welcome to alt-blurbs or amendments to the main blurb. But note that even with the directors not involved, we are still talking about something that has broad residual impacts on the industry. Other auxiliary employee classes will not be able to work under this environment. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 20:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the articles needs to be about the combined strike, and right positioned only as the SAG one. This is absolutely burying the lede. Masem (t) 01:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support Strike is very much in the news right now. It was already posted since a consensus existed at the time. It reflects badly on us to pull items unless there is a serious quality issue.
NoahTalk 10:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's still all over the British news too. Secretlondon (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting Oppose I can't help thinking this would have been better as an Ongoing item. After all, what is the impact now? And posted in less than SIX HOURS - have we still not gathered that this is a really bad idea except for items that are ITN/R or otherwise obviously going to be posted? Black Kite (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    How can this make more sense as Ongoing rather than as blurb? It used to be the norm that an event is first blurbed and then moves to Ongoing once it drops off, assuming it's still relevant by then. Khuft (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Post-posting oppose per Amakuru. estar8806 (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support I'm not pulling this. Above editors are citing Amakuru's reasoning for pulling, which is literally an OTHERSTUFF argument. This story is in the news and has a quality article. Let it stay. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, this would be a horribly irresponsible pull. DarkSide830 (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not really an OTHERSTUFF argument. This argument is "we generally don't post strikes, what makes this one more important than all the others that have happened"? To which there has yet appeared no answer, as far as I can see. Black Kite (talk) 18:07, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The answer could be as simple as "from now on, post more strikes of major industries". Bart Terpstra (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    As the supports repeatedly make a point of saying, it’s important due to the wide-ranging effects on the entertainment industry and the fact it’s the first strike of its kind in sixty years. Virtually anyone that watches TV or movies will in some way be affected here. The rationale is that it’s simply important; arguing that it needs to be proven more important is, as stated above, textbook OTHERSTUFF. The Kip (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Those "other strikes" are "other stuff" we didn't post, and "we shouldn't post this" as a result is an OTHERSTUFF argument, never mind the fact that every nomination here should be considered on its own merits and cannot be compared to an event that wasn't nominated. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you're missing Amakuru's - and my - point. I can't see that we've ever posted strikes before, so why is this one - affecting relatively few people (yes, 180K is relatively few in this context) and which has only just started so its impact is unquantifiable - different? Other than "but famous people"? Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand why you think it's limited to 180,000 people. Yes, the writers and actors themselves are striking, but it also affects the livelihood of those other personnel who contribute to those sectors in the entertainment industry, as they are now without work and many of them have no recourse. Although it might be WP:CRYSTAL to assume how long this will last, it's also not appropriate to post as an ongoing item, as you have suggested. A labor dispute has two milestones: the beginning of the strike, and the final negotiation of a contract. There are no intermediate steps that would merit this be ongoing. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 18:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If this is the first strike ITN has posted, I'd actually be asking why we hadn't posted any before. A potential UPS strike may cost the U.S. $7 billion in a ten day period. I'd at least consider supporting that, if the strike happens and is nominated here. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support These strikes will have a major impact on Hollywood, which will affect anyone who watches shows or films made by Hollywood. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did not support this originally but at this point think it should just be left up. This will also create precedent for other such events which might diversify coverage in the future. - Indefensible (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support This should probably stay up mostly due to the fact that Hollywood has global influence and this strike is already affecting ton of productions thus impacting more than hundreds of millions of consumers worldwide rather than just the writers, actors, and companies involved. This put it way above other strikes that we did not post or nominate. Also, I don't think Amakuru's argument should just be dismissed as WP:OTHERSTUFF since this is not an actual policy and only concerns deletion discussions iirc. --StellarHalo (talk) 22:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Now now, don't forget about WP:ONLYESSAY. 😉 Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 00:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    To be clear (God, I hate my catchphrase), when I told Amakuru OTHERSTUFF, it was just in an edit summary. Those mean next to nothing. The main reason was italicized: this one is the one (famous or significant or impactful) that won now. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) 2023 North India floods

Article: 2023 North India floods (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In northern India, heavy rainfall causes flooding and landslides which kill at least 100 people. (Post)
News source(s): CBS, CNN, Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Current weather disaster with significant damages and casualties. - Indefensible (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Daniel Goldberg (producer)

Article: Daniel Goldberg (producer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://deadline.com/2023/07/daniel-goldberg-dead-the-hangover-producer-late-shift-emmy-nominee-1235436510/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian film producer. Article looks good but there's an uncited filmography that needs citing. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: André Watts

Article: André Watts (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indiana Public Media
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article well sourced and updated --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ryuchell

Article: Ryuchell (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Japanese non gender conforming artist, 27. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 14:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added English language BBC reference. Suicide is not confirmed, just suspected according to the article. Secretlondon (talk) 17:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


RD: Oleg Tsokov

Article: Oleg Tsokov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.moscowtimes.ru/2023/07/11/esche-odin-rossiiskii-general-pogib-na-voine-v-ukraine-a48547
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Russian General. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support There are no blaring citation needed tags or anything that catches my eye, so I think the article looks fine ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This does not affect my support, but I think the article should be divided up into individual sections if there's enough material (it's kind of difficult to navigate) ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Article is fine. Alex-h (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Indian Haven

Article: Indian Haven (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/classic-winner-and-sire-indian-haven-dies-at-23/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British Thoroughbred racehorse. Nearly good aside froma few uncited statements. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(blurb posted) RD/Blurb: Milan Kundera

Proposed image
Article: Milan Kundera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Czech-French writer Milan Kundera (pictured) dies at the age of 94. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, The New York Times, CNN, AlJazeera, Le Monde, Deutsche Welle
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Czech-born French writer --Vacant0 (talk) 10:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support blurb. Famous author, numerous awards, around 75 wiki pages. I also see he was in a fiction book as a character. Kirill C1 (talk) 13:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose blurb - Once again, we have RD for a reason. Blurbs aren't meant to be awards for recently deceased famous people, unless their deaths have far-reaching impact on the world (Elizabeth II, for example). Also, it's not even front-page on most news sites. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not award. If we blurb any writer at all, this should be him. Kirill C1 (talk) 05:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Kundera is definitely a literary giant, having contributed to both the Czech and French literatures. There are very few writers who have received acclamation for writing in more than one language (another notable example is Nabokov).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb per Kiril. Since the death blurb criteria are somewhat nebulous, I'll judge based on my own subjective findings: Compare with Günter Grass whom we have also posted as a death blurb in the past. This man was a legendary writer and certainly falls into my previously declared category of "the writer has some credits or notoriety outside of their field, such as being a public figure in other areas as well." --Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 16:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb doesn't have Nobel prize in literature, not enough of household name. No doubt a notable author etc but this isn't even close to Shinzo Abe level or even Tina Turner. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Nobel Prize in Literature has relatively low regard and is definitely not the highest award in the field.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which one is better known than the Nobel Prize in your opinion?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's the most notable one among normal people (ie. most wikipedia users) who are not bibliophiles enough to know all the other awards. Looking at his awards, I don't even see a Booker prize (one of the few other book awards that I personally am aware of). Simply put, he is not fit for a blurb on English wikipedia. Certainly a RD is merited, and probably a blurb on French or Czech wikipedia would totally make sense - but he is not notable enough to be on the front page. A DYK would also be fitting i think QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but do most readers judge writers off of just prizes? Perhaps it's the most notable prize, but winning an award doesn't make you a great writer, nor does not winning one make you not a great writer. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's certainly no standard that requires that an author win a Nobel Prize in order to be considered transformative. In fact, the idea that it's required seems a bit Eurocentric. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 18:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tolstoy and Chekhov don't need a Nobel Prize to be regularly named among the greatest writers of all time (even the opening sentence in their article mentions it). So, it's not about awards at all. I'm sure most people admire him because of his works.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the moment I support an RD. A blurb I won't oppose, but also not support, there are differing sources for his private life, and a lot of gossip is around in the sources. I'd remove the challenged rest before adding a citation needed tag again and AGF the rest.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Blurb - not a household name. We didn't blurb more well-known authors who passed away, I don't see why this author should be blurbed. --RockstoneSend me a message! 18:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    "not a household name". The ignorance is very bold. Looking at your track record on Candidates, I think you mean "not an American name", because, frankly, I can't understand it. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not ignorance. Just because he's a household name to you doesn't mean he's a household name to the rest of the world. In the immortal words of Leela from Futurama "The United States is part of the world." --RockstoneSend me a message! 00:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Citing a line from an American cartoon sitcom to make your philosophical point. That'll certainly do the job. I agree with Alsor that it would do you well to educate yourself beyond just the apparently limited perspective you bring to ITN every day. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It'd do you well to read WP:NPA. All perspectives are valid here. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 16:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It'd do you well to read WP:SYSTEMICBIAS. Noting that you are viewing this author with a limited point of view is not a personal attack. Our goal here is to direct readers to subjects they might not have been looking for but nonetheless may interest them. It behooves us to maintain an open perspective about these subjects when discussing significance. Yes, all perspectives are welcome here, but transformative figures ought to be viewed as an absolute whole rather than relative to other people, places or points of view. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 16:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:DUEWEIGHT also applies. People known in the Anglosphere are inherently more notable as they are more likely to be widely covered on the English Wikipedia.
    I feel like many go so far to try and remove some arbitrary American or European-bias we have, but naturally there will be more significance placed, like how the Spanish Wikipedia will be more likely to put up stories related to the Hispanosphere on their ITN. Completely natural, not that we should strive to be biased. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, exactly. This reminds me of when I looked at the Indonesian Wikipedia during the height of COVID; they dedicated a huge portion of ITN to Indonesia specific statistics. I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with that when they knew most (nearly all?) of their viewers were coming from Indonesia. Of course, English Wikipedia is different in that English is a more global language. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 19:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, do remember that English is the lingua franca and that, combined with of course the diversity of demographics within the USA alone, is a huge driver for why English Wikipedia is unique in that it's not strictly representative of an Americentric/Anglosphere POV. They are certainly the dominant group on Wikipedia in terms of participation, but tyranny of the majority is something that ought to be avoided in general in a collaborative environment such as this. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 20:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    But it's not like that. The major difference is that in English Wikipedia the imbalance is within the Anglo-Saxon sphere (titanic preference for U.S. related topics) while in Spanish Wikipedia, although it obviously predominates the issues that concern the Hispanic sphere over the Anglo-Saxon sphere as a matter of course, it does not highlight a dominance of one of the countries. You also forget the categorization of English as a universal language. _-_Alsor (talk) 20:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    But whatever, it's more something political and patriotic (something almost inherent in Anglo-Saxon culture) than something strictly objective. _-_Alsor (talk) 20:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    In retrospect, I strike and withdraw my comment. Cheers, WaltClipper -(talk) 19:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @WaltCip: I appreciate you doing that. Thank you! -- RockstoneSend me a message! 19:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't say it, but everyone says so, both experts and Kundera's millions of readers. But ok. _-_Alsor (talk) 20:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    First, the name of the novel I think is household, no objections about that?
    Second, it is not criteria. We didn't blurb Harry Belfonte, William Hurt, Ray Liotta, Olivia de Havilland, Alan Arkin, Vangelis and more who were household names. It is about transfomativeness, which is the case here. Kirill C1 (talk) 06:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Highly important author. — Ixtal ( T / C ) Non nobis solum. 19:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Textbook case of a perfect candidate, but that lead is atrocious what is with the extreme focus on citizenship and classification of French/Czech right there in the opening para (a single descriptor should do). With that lead it is a no from me on quality concerns. Gotitbro (talk) 20:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on current quality, support blurb Absolutely a household name, and more so if you happen to be from anywhere in continental Europe. Big cleanup including lead and more citations needed though. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb on notability, Quality fine for me The Tina Turner of world literature, especially with his masterpiece of the 1980s The Unbearable Lightness of Being. This year has witnessed quite a few deaths among famous authors, many of which I would have considered worthy of blurbing. Kundera is certainly among the most worthy of blurbing. If we blurb important figures of music (Turner) or sports (some of the baseball / basketball / football players we have blurbed in the past), I would hope we are as forthcoming with more serious (and maybe less popular) arts such as literature. Khuft (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb on quality undisputed and unquestioned notoriety. But the article is far from having the necessary quality. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb as nothing in the article gives any type of impact or legacy aspect to consider, and Oppose RD on poor sourcing quality. --Masem (t) 22:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I want to stress to those supporting a blurb "because he was important" that our article gives nothing to talk about this. Awards are important to include but alone do not tell us of wht he was considered important or influential. Do not just handwave the importance, please document the evidence in the article. Masem (t) 15:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD due to notesworthy career and good article quality. --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    As of this post, the article quality is nowhere close to posting. far too much unsourced material. Masem (t) 01:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Definitely worthy for RD, famous author with multiple awards, not sure if it is ITN worthy, but it is definitley RD worthy. Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb It's only 12 words which is still next to nothing for such a great figure. And we should be running a new picture every day, not running them for weeks as we just did with Bolsonaro. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Blurb, Article not ready for posting - Given his notability and coverage in the press, I'm ok to include a blurb. However we often delay or oppose posting many RD nominations because the bibliography or filmography is not adequately cited - I would really hope we apply the same scrutiny here and hold this article to the same quality standards as many other less popular RDs. Schwinnspeed (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose RD whole sections without citation. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blurb There is current discussion on the ITN talk page about how stale ITN has been lately. Given that this is a very notable, very well-respected figure in literature, I see no convincing argument for why this shouldn't be posted. SunsetShotguns (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for the ones who want to voteː It won't get posted as long the article has numerous uncited phrases, also several paragraphs and small but whole sections that are unsourced. Better invest the time you need for voting in sourcing the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And as much as I want a blurb, I have to agree. Furthermore, I am not sure about the reliability of sources like this one and the fact that some sources which may be reliable nonetheless fail verification. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Global temperature records broken

Proposed image
Articles: Weather of 2023 (talk · history · tag) and List of weather records (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Global temperature records for the day, week and month are exceeded as a result of global warming and El Niño. (Post)
News source(s): Hottest day, Hottest week, Hottest June, Why so hot?,
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Temperature records for the globe are being broken on a daily basis, the WMO has announced the hottest week on record and last month was the hottest June ever. We have heatwaves all over with more to come as a result of El Niño. But we don't seem to have a single good target article. I've found what I can to make a start but feel that we need the assistance of some weather experts such as Femke, please. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - in le news. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, kind of surprised there is no ongoing story climate change, as it creates a new content for Wikipedia every single week :) Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Climate change is far too broad to be ongoing. No real start or end date, very loose definitions as to what constitutes it. Better to just leave it to the occasional blurb. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anthropogenic effects leading to permanent changes in the climate.
And yes, sometimes it's harder to tell, but "record amount of hurricanes" or "warmest XYZ" is almost certainly climate change and would be encyclopedic. (but repetitive 🙂) Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Still too broad for ITN. It would practically be ongoing for the next 100 years. Not really what ITN is for. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow, it's too broad and common knowledge to be news, but i also still require sources to say it exists and is a cause for obvious things. Fun contradiction. Bart Terpstra (talk) 19:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know some don't believe it exists, but I don't get what we're supposed to do about that. ITN isn't for environmental PSAs exactly.
The reality is that it's too broad, there's nothing contradictory about that. It's so long-term it's comparable to putting the War on terror on ongoing between 2001 and 2021 since it was a regular recurring item. It was just too broad of an event.
It doesn't help that the notability of most climate-related blurbs comes from the impact of these climate events on human civilisation, rather than being linked to climate change itself.
I can see where you're coming from, but even if we were to put it on ongoing, it still wouldn't make sense as climate-related stories are very rarely brought up. Ongoing requires a very regular stream of updates to its target article. In regards to protests or wars, we usually need very regular day-to-day updates on the article and recent developments.
For example, we took off the Israeli judicial reform protests since, while there still are lots of protests in Israel, there are not enough regular updates to warrant it being still 'Ongoing'. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. However agree with Sandstein that we should improve the target article. — Czello (music) 09:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support once target article is suitable. Whatever happened to (or why can't we use) "Global Warming"? CoatCheck (talk) 13:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Global warming should be put into context in the blurb. Everyone knows it as a standalone term which is not news anymore. Brandmeistertalk 14:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As noted from the outset, the challenge here is finding the best target article. So far, the only article I've found with an update is Weather of 2023. Possible candidates include:
  1. 2023 heat waves – List of heat waves
  2. Climate change – Human-caused changes to climate on Earth
  3. El Niño – Climate phenomenon that periodically fluctuates
  4. Global surface temperature – Average temperature of the Earth's surface
  5. Global temperature record – Average temperature of the Earth's surface
  6. Global warming – redirects to climate change
  7. List of weather records
  8. Weather of 2023
We should figure this out because we're only halfway through the year and there's more to come. I had hoped that some weather specialist editor(s) might help but I suppose they are mostly out enjoying the warm weather. :)
In the meantime, the article that's getting most attention from our readership is El Niño. See stats.
Andrew🐉(talk) 07:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can't get on board with any of these. Most of them are too broad to reasonably list these record, and as PC notes below, lists probably aren't great targets either. The obvious issue with most of these is that, should these record be broken again, the current record will likely be removed from the article, which is not really an issue for the life of the item while it is at ITN, but is a concern worth noting as well. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2023 Vilnius summit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 Vilnius summit (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ World leaders meet at Vilnius, Lithuania for a NATO summit to discuss Ukraine and Sweden's membership, as well as the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war. (Post)
News source(s): [1] [2]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Well, it is a recurring meeting where important world leaders discuss important, pressing issues in the world. So, why not put it on the Main Page? — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 01:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Until the summit has actually occurred. Currently, the article has nothing detailing what is going on, because it isn't going on. (Side note: the article you put at the top of the ITN candidate template is always bolded.) Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Our past approach to any such world leader meeting is to see if there are any significant achievements made by the end of the event and then we'll post that. It should be clear that either Ukraine or Sweden joining NATO is very much ITN-quality material, but we need a definitive on that. Masem (t) 01:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Masem, @Fakescientist8000 Ok, understood :) I'm new to this whole ITN thing, and I do certainly agree that Ukraine or Sweden joining NATO would be certainly ITN-worthy. In the meantime, I will continue editing and updating the article. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 01:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Covered by ongoing, literally just a meeting of global leaders, like G7. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose routine and meeting is not noteworthy, only potential conclusions would be noteworthy. Bart Terpstra (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: JoAnn Watson

Article: JoAnn Watson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Detroit city councillor. Article appears to be in good shape. Curbon7 (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The intro is where one would expect career highlights or a summary of one's life. The intro in this wikibio does not seem to match the materials in the main prose, which needs a paragraph or so about the subject being a media personality and a professor as stated in the intro. --PFHLai (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Al Giordano

Article: Al Giordano (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://dankennedy.net/2023/07/13/al-giordano-1959-2023/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American journalist. Article looks alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Reopened) Ongoing: 2023 Israeli judicial reform protests

Nominator's comments: In Israel, there are weekly largescale protests with over 100'000 participants going on since months. the protests are over a judicial reform which would allow criminally charged politicians such as Benyamin Netanyahu to seize control over the judiciary. Israels President Herzog mediated a dialogue between supporters and opponents to the reform project in March, but Netanyahu pushes forward since late June. The protests are likely escalating as a vote on the reform is expected for tomorrow, Monday and companies will give their employees free to be able to protest. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional oppose - Article hasn't been updated in 10 days. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated it today. Just check the edit history. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I mean in terms of recent protests. It has been now, but at the time of writing my comment the last update on the protests was on July 1st. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, isn't it still July 10th? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The opposes per "not updated" and "per above" are invalid as the article is getting updated. I am contesting the close but I do not know how.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reopened the discussion as I have updated the article before and after the nomination. The article also received regular major (more than a 500 bytes) updates in the month of July here, here, here, here, by different editors in the month July. Some even specifically mentioning protests in July. So the votes with arguments like the article has not been updated in 10 days or there is nothing since the 1 of this month and the per above arguments I don't see as valid points to make.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's still absolutely nothing on anything that happened in between the 1st and 11th, and you've failed to demonstrate it's still getting wide coverage. Your opinion of/disagreement with "invalid points" is not grounds to re-open the discussion. As such, this should be re-closed. The Kip (talk) 19:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@The Kip Check the edit from the 1 July which treats protests of the 1st of July with the edit summary add 1 July events. 130'000 people...then the edit from the 6th of July on protests of the 5th of July. Then the one from the 11 July for the protests of the 11 July. All of them not my updates, with mine it would be way more. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article is poorly structured as that last section seems to be a chronological order of protests ... which are already discussed in the timeline of the protests? There needs to be a lot of improvement in the article to consider this, particularly if the most current events elevate it to ongoing when really the big issue started around January? Masem (t) 00:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that later sections need to be reworked. I've removed some dubiously notable sentences from the article and will do another round soon. Frankly, i weak support the inclusion of the protests in the 'ongoing' section in light of recent events. If the issue's a lack of updates, i hope someone steps up to fix that Totalstgamer (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I can understand that the frequnecy of updates here is somewhat borderline, but it's very clear the significance and recency of these protests. I personally see the updates that have been made recently as sufficient for posting. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose for now. Appears to have been only two events in the past 2 weeks, which are only covered by two small updates. Also, article has major quality issues, mostly of the usual WP:PROSELINE problems that plague these kinds of articles; the lazy "On XX Date..." writing needs to be fixed and put in a more natural narrative flow. --Jayron32 14:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirziyoyev remains president of Uzbekistan

Proposed image
Article: 2023 Uzbek presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Shavkat Mirziyoyev remains the president of Uzbekistan after a presidential election. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev (pictured) is re-elected president.
Alternative blurb II: ​ After an election widely seen as neither free nor fair, Shavkat Mirziyoyev remains the president of Uzbekistan.
Alternative blurb III: Shavkat Mirziyoyev retains his position as the president of Uzbekistan.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Needs more prose. Wording of proposed blurb to reflect sham election and de facto authoritarian rule. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional oppose - Article remains dodgy. Also, the fact that this election was essentially a sham brings down notability. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fakescientist8000:@Rockstone35: The Cuban parliamentary election in March wasn’t posted. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 21:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for quality, no prose, no expansion since days. If concerns are addressed, I'd support alt2. It is ITNR but I also understand the concern of Rockstone. So alt2 is a possibility to raise awareness on environment the elections were held in. If this alt2 goes against the rules, I support alt3.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there is also an unsourced paragraph, no info on presidential campaigns...Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Ready) RD: Mel Wakabayashi

Article: Mel Wakabayashi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chatham Daily News, International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Japanese-Canadian ice hockey player named collegiate player of year in 1966; played 11 seasons in the Japan Ice Hockey League and coached Japan men's national ice hockey team Cbl62 (talk) 11:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Benno C. Schmidt Jr.

Article: Benno C. Schmidt Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/10/nyregion/benno-schmidt-jr-dead.html
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American academic. Article looks good aside from two uncited things. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Alain Besançon

Article: Alain Besançon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Figaro, Onet
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Sovietologue and expert on the history of Christianity as well as anti-totaliarism. Needs expansion but lots of sources present, German and French Wikipedias may be of use too. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Lee Hedges

Article: Lee Hedges (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Advocate
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American football coach. Article looks alright aside from one uncited sentence. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Luis Suárez

Article: Luis Suárez (footballer, born 1935) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Diario AS; La Gazzetta dello Sport; L'Equipe; The Guardian; Il Post
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Apart from his club and international accolades, Suárez notably won the Ballon d'Or in 1960, and still remains the only Spanish male footballer to have ever done so to this day. The article likely needs to be expanded and lacks a lot of key sources, but the links I've put right above, as well as this beautiful obituary by Diario AS, should help get everything in good shape. The it.wiki page should have some useful sources to retrieve, too! Oltrepier (talk) 14:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suppport article is fairly sourced now. *Oppose for now. Ballon d'or sounds good but is unsourced. Much more in the article as well. Article needs quite some work.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paradise Chronicle I agree, and I'll see what I can do to bring its quality up in the next few days. Oltrepier (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: