Jump to content

User talk:Anthony Bradbury: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
reads like an advertisement
Line 1,428: Line 1,428:


Could you at least restore the draft so that I can edit further? I don't have any backup files. [[User:Vorosvictor|Vorosvictor]] ([[User talk:Vorosvictor|talk]]) 12:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Could you at least restore the draft so that I can edit further? I don't have any backup files. [[User:Vorosvictor|Vorosvictor]] ([[User talk:Vorosvictor|talk]]) 12:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

:I can place it in your talk page. But please be aware that as it stands t reads like an advertisement and, as such. is not acceptable. ----[[User:Anthony Bradbury|<span style="color: Red;">'''Anthony Bradbury'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Anthony Bradbury|<span style="color: Black;">"talk"</span>]]</sup> 13:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:54, 9 August 2022

Current time: 12:50,   November   28   (UTC)



Archives








Why did you remove my external links?

If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added, please read Wikipedia's policies on spam, Wikipedia external link guidelines and conflict-of-interest first. Because of Wikipedia's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Wikipedia policies. If you read WP:SPAM and still feel that your link(s) does not violate those policies, let me know.

One common argument I hear is But so-and-so link is on that article, and it's commercial! WP:EL doesn't explicitly forbid In links to commercial sites; it depends on the notability of the link, its content, and if it's a reference or a notable pro/con argument on a controversial subject, etc. On the other hand, I think that many Wikipedians would agree that there are way too many commercial links at present time, so feel free to "prune away" if the link doesn't meet guidelines in WP:EL. Incidentally, if you've come here to complain that I've deleted links to your blog (especially a blog with advertising), don't bother. You'll have to find free advertising somewhere else. A good Google search will reveal plenty of places for that sort of thing.

Vandalism and insults left here will be recycled in the bit bucket. Remember: be nice!





Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
  • Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of Long Live the Worker's Party of Korea

Hi,

I was going through some of my older and more embarrasing contributions, and saw to my dismay I had an article deleted for G12 copyvio. Could you jog my memory of what the contents of that page was? If it's not suitable for public distribution, I have my email function enabled.

Best, BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 05:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is a North Korean revolutionary song.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Pearls before swine" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pearls before swine. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 17#Pearls before swine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Major milestone

Hello. This is my 10,000th edit, and I wanted you to have it. Davidelit (Talk) 06:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Blake Paulson article

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blake_Paulson&action=edit&redlink=1

Anthony, I'm an editor with a keen interest in banking history. I'm curious why the Blake Paulson article was deleted. I see that copyright infringements were cited -- but the content came from a U.S. government website (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.) Isn't there a fair use exemption? I cannot see the article (maybe I just don't know how to find it) but I suspect it could be improved and salvaged if there are not ENOUGH third-party sources. Rider4151 (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Rider4151[reply]

You are correct; my error. I have restored article and removed speedy tag. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Glimesh

Could I please have you revert the deletion of Glimesh? With the return of its original page, I, and perhaps others that have been notified outside here, shall resume working on it to prove the streaming service has its importance on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBJblaze (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query On created page

Hello,

My username is Sadekar Ashish. Can you please help me with the page have created. Its being gets moved or deleted. Please guide be on this.

Your help will be more appreciative.

Thanks, Ashish Sadekar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadekar Ashish (talk • contribs) 06:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for the deletion is clearly stated on the deletion page. Please note that while writing about yourself is not absolutely forbidden, it is very strongly discouraged.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi I would love to know why you deleted my Wikipedia page titled "Abdiqani Sheikh Omar Hassan" stating copyright infringement of https://newsghana.com.gh/abdiqani-sheikh-omar-hassan-biography/ (a link that doesn't exist). Had you tried to visit the link https://newsghana.com.gh/abdiqani-sheikh-omar-hassan-biography/ to see if it exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielMaithya (talk • contribs) 17:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The whole first paragraph is word-for-word identical. The fact that the remainder of the text differs somwhat from the link is not relevant. The link appears not to work, agreed, but reading the test and comparing it is easy.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my page?

Hi I would love to know why you deleted my Wikipedia page titled "Abdiqani Sheikh Omar Hassan" stating copyright infringement of https://newsghana.com.gh/abdiqani-sheikh-omar-hassan-biography/ (a link that doesn't exist). Had you tried to visit the link https://newsghana.com.gh/abdiqani-sheikh-omar-hassan-biography/ to see if it exists?

Please help restore the page. Thank you!

No. I have already answered this question above on this page. Copyright violation is clear. The fact that the link does not work is wholly irrelevant.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleted my page bro Agcobile Mxhonywa (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Kevin Patel

User:Tidekazan has asked for a deletion review of Kevin Patel. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 08:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

removed Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

removed Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you restore a page to my userspace?

It's an essay, Creating Wikipedia:Being blocked hurts, you deleted in 2017 (yes, I know)... Actually, I guess maybe you just deleted the redirect... it was an essay that I (wanted to) move into my userspace per a WP:RM, but it says I moved it to User:Being blocked hurts by mistake, which of course it's gone now...I do have a more-or-less copy in my Userspace, but if I'm reading it right the history is lost... but my understanding is history is never lost except for oversights?

I really only want the talk page pretty much... wanting to ref the RM thread for something. Hey if it's a hassle to do this, I'm good. It's nice-but-not necessary, just perhaps let me know (here) if you can't or won't, thanks. Herostratus (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this Creating User:Being blocked hurts bears on it too... ugh did I mess up. Herostratus (talk) 22:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to restoring the text to your userspace; the difficulty is that i cannot find it. There appears to me a thread involving at least one redirect, at least one move and a change in your username, which i cannot yet follow. I am little short of time now, but will get back to it ASAP. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but again, it's just really not important. Please don't spend more than a couple minutes on it, really. I never changed my username, no. It'd be interesting and maybe not great if moving a page to an illegal place has the effect of destroying the history. That'd be a bug. Herostratus (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

mainspace redirect

Can you tell me what needs to be removed please then? If so thanks for the information on the rules. I'll try to find these namespaces redirect and delete them.

what is the hoax about it

Can you please tell me what is the hoax about it? I will be very grateful for your help and information on the topic at hand. I am not trying to sound rude, or disrespectful just a bit interested in knowing what was the blatant hoax. Can I get a few minutes out of your day to know this on the topic at hand, please? I would love to speak to you, and for you to be willing to speak to me. whenever you have free time will do. please send me something back to know when you are free. with all due respect to you.

The highest ranking demons

The draft is The highest ranking demons.

The problem is that your draft is non-factual. This is an encyclopedia: if you can provide good quality references for the statements you offer then we can reconsider.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I can do just that, but it will take some time

Sorry for getting back to you so late.

My Article was the highest-ranking demon's right, and I did have these facts on it.

Most of what I talked about comes from the Holy Bible.

Lucifer like I said was top of the star, and the most powerful prince of hell right, and was one of the angels around God's throne, and was top and spirit before the fall, and also was the lion sin of pride right.

https://rightdivision.com/charts/alpha-omega/section-1/lucifer-anointed-cherub

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/175781191689785219/

there are too many facts to write on and talk about. On this talk page, I put all the facts in the citations where I got the information from.

You deleted Allison Enchelmayer

Do you now there's a News article about Allison Enchelmayer.Arek333 (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

That does not make her notable. THe only claim made in the article of encyclopedic notability is that she plays golf, which in my view is insufficient. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

actors

Is Kamil McFadden the actor significant.Arek333 (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

this is not a meaningful question. Wikipediaq articles are judged primarily on the article text; I do not see an article about him. I am aware that he is an actor who has acted parts in some Marvel films. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

added Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
removed Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anushka Sen

This is confusing me. The creating editor battled long and hard to create this, via AFC, but has now requested deletion. This feels little like Wikipedia:Ownership of content. I wonder if you would take more than usual time to look at the background to this one, please?

Sen seems to be notable at last (you may disagree, I did for ages), so it will only reappear in one form or another (0.95 probability). It is a fan created article

A further look may reinforce your deletion or may overturn it.I am not seeking to influence that, rather I'd like to understand a little more, please. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly more confusing, the article is back (a good thing), but I suspect admin goggles may be needed to divine the reason. Are you able to shed any light on this please? FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 06:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, i cannot throw light on it. I did not re-create the article (was not asked to) and probably would not have done so. Obviously I will not edit-war over it. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am beginning to see. I think it was moved to draft space by a vandal, leaving a redirect. I think you will then have deleted the redirect as "Leaving main space" and the redirect will have been created by the vandal and possibly blanked by them, or CSDd by them to cause this to take place.
Later, the vandalism was undone, and the correct status quo was returned for this only just notable actor.
That is my best guess. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 12:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

U5/G11

I saw that you deleted User:Kittubindass's userpage shortly after I challenged User:Susmuffin's tag of it as U5 and G11. Based on timing, I'm guessing you'd already loaded the page before I untagged. This kind of thing isn't usually the sort of hill I care to die on, but, since I had already untagged, in this case I'd like to politely contest the deletion. I don't see why "[user] is a [profession] at [business]" on a userpage is exclusively promotional, and I don't really see the case for U5 either. Respectfully -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 11:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could perhaps make a case against a G11 deletion, although if you did I would argue against you; but there can surely be no doubt that U5 applies. This is a userpage, and falls well outside the userpage guidelines and policies. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm misunderstanding U5. Most of this user's contribs have been deleted, but the mainspace CSD notices on his talkpage suggest he's left U5's domain of few or no edits outside of user pages. And the content of the page wasn't that different than what I've seen on any number of established Wikipedians' pages. Third-person userpages in faux-encyclopedic style are common enough. So is saying where one works. If I put on my userpage Tamzin, born $DOB, is an American writer and programmer. She is the founder and chief executive officer of $SomeCompany, I really can't imagine someone arguing that that violates WP:UPNOT. That's essentially how the first section of User:Jimbo Wales reads, to pick the first example that comes to mind.
Judging from the talkpage, I don't doubt that this editor has had issues with COI, which is part of why I said this wouldn't normally be my hill to die on. But I don't see how the userpage itself is an issue, again unless I'm really misunderstanding U5. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 17:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jw-ripley

Hi, I noticed this user with a very bizarre edit history, where they copy a sportsman's article into their sandbox, and substitute what is presumably their name in for the sportsman's name. They've been doing this once a day for two years (!), with no mainspace edits save for two where they accidentally subbed the name into the real articles. Whatever their reasons for doing this, they are seemingly not here to build an encyclopedia, and admin action might be required. Their user talk page was also created by a sockpuppet, so that may play into things somehow as well. Regards, —Somnifuguist (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found another user, User:Allenn13, with an identical pattern of behaviour (872 daily sandbox edits over 2 years, 0 in mainspace) and whose sandbox the above user linked in this diff. Almost certainly the same person. —Somnifuguist (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As the edits are exclusively to the editor sandbox, and therefore only the last one survives, these edits do not affect the encyclopedia. I have contacted the editor (or editors) via talkpage, without response as of now. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. I just thought it was worth putting on an admin's radar, as it's the oddest thing I've seen on this site by some margin. —Somnifuguist (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a page with a contested deletion without any discussion at all?!

You just deleted a perfectly valid article - Christian Emmanuel Sanon - that had a drive by CFD on it, which I wrote an objection to on the Talk page, and you just drive-by deleted it without even allowing discussion to occur! What is the point of having a link to contest the stupid CFD if you're just going to delete them without respecting the voices of people who _actually write articles_? I think every day Wikipedia dies a little bit more because of this kind of terrible moderation. Awful administration in my opinion. Miserlou (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As is always the case, you are free to make your objection at deletion review. I would have thought that the reason given for immediate deletion was convincing.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And, for the record, I am a person who (also) writes articles. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Request of restoration of draft:Engr Babalola Olatunji

Hello please i am contacting you in regard of two things, first my userpage Tommygogd that was brought down and my first draft article Draft:Engr Babalola Olatunji this article was done neutrally , and i have been told to do declare a conflict of interest on my user page which i did, i do not understand why the article was brought down and also my page, this is my first article ever and i am doing this on a neutral point , is it possible for a person who does not have any contribution or whatsover to be paid for creating article, please i am pleading kindly restore the page so i can add more citation or for other contributor to be able to contribute to it , i am already getting discouraged because this is my first contribution and i have put so much effort in it than to be deleted, even if i am not given the priviledge to edit it , at least other contributor can for the sake of my effort.Tommygogd (talk). and if not please kindly restore to my userspace so i can continue to use it to pratice. but I wish you know this can make some of us trying to put effort in Wikipedia sad. Tommygogd (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Abbaszadeh

Hi, you deleted the page Reza Abbaszadeh under CSD A7 while the article was still at AfD and adequately supported from independent sources. Can you please tell me the reason so I can be more careful next time? Thanks. --Vertinagin (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An admin is not obliged to wait for an AfD to be determined if the article qualifies for a speedy deletion. I would concede that the rationale quoted by the original nominator is invalid, and I have notified him of this fact. Nevertheless, the article in my opinion qualifies for speedy deletion. I agree that references are quoted, but the unarguable fact of his existence is not of itself adequate to qualify as a person who has adequate claimed notability. But if you wish to appeal this decision feel free to do so. Go to deletion review to do this. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the information. I appreciate the explanation however, in the deletion log, you seem to have restored the page and then deleted again. May I know the reason for this? Please ignore if I am bothering you. Thanks again. --Vertinagin (talk) 06:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I restored it briefly just to check in full detail that my original decision was reasonable. It is difficult to assess references while an articles remains deleted. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Reza Abbaszadeh

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Reza Abbaszadeh. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Vertinagin (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request of restoration of redirect: Erduvan redirecting to Erdogan

The page Erduvan should redirect to Erdogan as it is the pronunciation of Erdogan.


FizzoXD (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of European and Asiatic names are pronounced in ways differing from the obvious. Nevertheless i will restore it ; let us see if it survives. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes

readded Jake Wartenberg
removed Emperor • Viridian Bovary
renamed Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Batch deletion

Hello, Anthony,

Batch deletion can be handy and I use it when I need to delete a number of pages that are being deleted for the same reason. Unfortunately, Twinkle puts the same generic CSD reason as the deletion rationale for all of the pages. This is a problem when deletions are the result of a deletion discussion because Twinkle doesn't include a link to the specific AFD or TFD discussion where it was decided to delete the page. In these cases, I think you need to take the time to delete the pages individually. Just offering an opinion as an admin who has made this mistake before! Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kimberlynorth

Recreated just a couple of minutes after you deleted. Time for a wiki-spank 10mmsocket (talk) 14:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

বার্নাড ৰীমান

Please could you undelete বার্নাড ৰীমান so that it can be transwikied to bn.wp (which it can be). I'm not sure why you speedy deleted it given that I removed the A10 nomination twice, explaining both times why it should not be speedily deleted. If there is a good faith objection to a speedy deletion nomination then, by definition, it cannot meet the criterion as speedy deletion is explicitly only for cases that unquestionably should be deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second article in Bengali within a day or so that the same author created about Bernhard Riemann (the other one, বার্নাড ৰিমান, is still there) about whom we already have an article and about whom Bengali Wikipedia already has an article, under a third spelling bn:বের্নহার্ট রিমান, so to transwiki one of the copies here to that project would be their equivalent of an A10. Largoplazo (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Augie Cataldo

Could you oblige, once more? Page was recreated, including CSD template. Thanks in advance. Kleuske (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UP

Midnight Traveler

I'm surprised you went ahead with deleting Midnight Traveler. Do you really think it "contain[ed] copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a compatible free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving" as WP:G12 says? Nardog (talk) 13:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you would be so good as to indicate the error (specifically) I will happily correct it. As things stand, my answer to your question is Yes, I do. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying a block quote preceded by an attribution to the original writer and a citation to the material the quote is from doesn't amount to a credible assertion of fair use?
I just recreated the article with the "infringing" part summarized using my own words. Everything in the article except the "Production" section is as created the first time. Do you maintain that those parts were not "worth saving"? Nardog (talk) 15:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I note what you say. I always try not to take "two bites at the cherry", so will leave it alone.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I don't understand what that means in this equation. I'm asking whether you stand by the deletion, which you are obliged to account for.
I've been here long enough to know that I'm not irreplaceable and there is no justice. But not many editors do, certainly not newcomers. So if you were to encounter another article with the same amount of sourcing but with the same proportion of quotation as the first version of mine and you would delete it, I would not be comfortable with that. It is incredibly dispiriting and demotivating to see something you worked on for hours get promptly taken off. If the creator was a newcomer or not as thick-skinned as I've become, their desire to keep contributing would be gutted, and we would lose a (would-be) valuable editor, which would be a net loss for the project.
Content creation is hard. That's why "not enough creation" is such a common complaint at RfAs. You must know that. I have great admiration for prolific contributors who just march on in the main namespace. I wrote the article precisely because I figured I should stop slacking off staring at my watchlist and cross off one in the list of links I, as a reader, have been disappointed to see in red. If this is what you get for that, not many people would take it well (I'm not saying I am—but others would likely take it worse).
I don't claim to have written a great, instant-FA-level article, and I admire patrollers and admins who do the necessary work as well. But if you see a problem, address the problem—not take the entire thing it belongs to with it. You would be justified to call the quotation lazy. I just do not see what reading of G12 allows it to be applied in this case. I want this project to thrive more than I want my contributions to remain, and I urge you to consider more carefully what long-term effects your actions have. (I also encourage you to use clearer language when inquired of about your admin actions. It is unclear what you mean by "note" or what it would mean for you to take "two bites at the cherry" or to not "leave it alone".) Nardog (talk) 06:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article is posted; I intend to do nothing with it. What do you want of me? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To not do it again if you come across a page tagged as G12 when the alleged infringing part is a quote that's attributed and cited and forms only a portion of the page.
You're again using vague language that's not helpful. What do you intend not to do? If you mean deleting it, why would anyone do that when it no longer contains the material you deleted the first version for?
And you still haven't answered my simple question, so I ask again. Do you stand by the deletion? Nardog (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This converstion is finished. Any further co0mments on the lines as your recent ones will be considered as harassment. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if my questions came off as aggressive, but I'm merely, and genuinely, asking whether you still think the deletion was in line with the policy. If you think you've already answered it, that was lost on me, so you can just repeat that and I will not bother you about this again. Nardog (talk) 22:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In my personl opiinon the deletion was within policy. Clearly you do not agree, which is your unargued right. As I have already said, I have not done anything else to the article. Taking two bites at a cherry is a not-uncommon phrase meaning to do things twice at the same place; as I also said, I try not to do this. As the article exists now in the form (I assume) with which you are satisfied, I see litle point in further discussion.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't the meaning of the idiom but what it referred to that was unclear, as the article no longer contains the part you deleted the previous version for so the same rationale could not possibly apply. As I explained repeatedly, I take issue not with your deletion per se but with the fact you've stood by it, which indicates you would do it again if you came across a similar situation. I'm not comfortable with that, so I'll defer to the community at Deletion review. Nardog (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: speedy deletion of "implausible" redirect, "James Harrison (blood donor"

What constitutes an "implausible" typo? Because that redirect was created because of a typo that factually occurred. It was, specifically, the result of a very common type of typo that occurs when linking wikipedia pages with parentheticals, due to how Markdown (the formatting language used on prominant sites such as reddit and github) formats links. I create such a redirect whenever I see such a broken link in the wild, and generally get thanks for such an action (one is currently on my talk page).

Frankly, I think Wikipedia should automatically redirect any nonexistent page titles with unclosed parenthenses, but until then, the reasonable solution is to add them manually, is it not? --LordDragonfang (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment; it is not clear to me why you felt the need to make it. My action was both correct and non-controversial, and I would do it again in the same situation. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. Is it Wikipedia policy to delete redirects of common classes of typos? If you can point me to where that guideline is laid out, I will happily alter my editing behavior. --LordDragonfang (talk) 03:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You must do what you think best in the light of your interpretation of current wikipedia policies and procedures. As do I. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check for significant contributions

I have made significant contributions to Ramón Escobar Santiago, Iñaxi Etxabe, Gladys Ejomi, and Elisabeth Ebeling. Thus CSD G5 does not apply. Your deletions are violating the stated policy. SilverserenC 22:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And Dick Klaverdijk. These articles were already restored by another admin. You're wheel-warring at this point. SilverserenC 22:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you just ignoring this? Now César Salinas as well. SilverserenC 22:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, i am not ignoring you. In view of the large number os sockpuppet edits involved, I have only just caught up with your comment. I take your point; may I suggest that at least for the present you aoid editing articles created by this sock? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, not really. If they're notable subjects, then the articles should be kept. There's plenty of articles I didn't edit because I didn't find any notability in them. Most of the sports ones, for example. Isn't checking for significant contributions one of the requirements for G5? Liz has been doing that, I notice. SilverserenC 22:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually fifteen and a half years as an editor, fourteen and a half years as an admin.
... and nine Precious --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I really do not know what you mean. Are you using the word "precious" in some way other than the usual English one? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taranveer Singh

Why did you delete the Taranveer Singh redirect I created. I clearly used the article creation template as I want an actual article here. Did you not notice the template? Neel.arunabh (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i deleted the redirect because it was inappropriate.If you want an actual article, then you are urged to create one. Redirecting the name of an individual to a large category is vey inexact. Or, looking at from another angle, when we go to the article [film director] then if the redirect is correct we would expect to see Taranveer Singh mentioned within the article. He is not, and the redirect is therefore inappropriate.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varoon2542

The userpage User:Varoon2542 was marked as a U1, except it was marked as such by User:Smalemon. Varoon2542 even requested the tag be removed CiphriusKane (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varoon2542 Deletion

I saw you deleted this page for U1 user request. But they did not request it. Another new user did for some reason. The page has since been restored. They also 'contested' the deletion on their talkpage. Bobherry Talk Edits 23:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

removed A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re-add a deleted page.

Hi. You deleted this page - [1] as it was created by a blocked user. The page had useful information and it was listed on Shivaji. Is it possible to undelete the page? If it is possible, I request you to undelete it. Akshaypatill (talk) 09:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page was created by a blocked user. Tht being so, I am not prepared to restore it. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Jacobson

Hi, you deleted the entry I worked on about Nathaniel Jacobson. I'd love to rework it though. I put a lot of work into getting the references and links to old newspaper articles about him. Is there any way to get access to the deleted version so I can use those references again? thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HC art (talk • contribs) 22:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re-add Peraton

The page Peraton was marked for speedy deletion by the user Onel5969, they claimed the material was copied from theladders.com. But I have proof that theladders.com copied it from wikipedia, in fact nearly all their company descriptions match wikipedia's entries... I contacted theladders.com and they apologized for copying it, and they are in the process of updating the Peraton description so it doesn't match wikipedia's (which is now deleted)... Anyway, I wrote that article using my own words and cited my sources for any facts, so please restore it and we can work through any other problems with it. Also here's an example of some random company I clicked on at theladders.com and you can see it matches: https://www.theladders.com/company/unsplash-jobs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsplash — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supremedemency (talk • contribs) 23:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you are stiupulating that the text which you posted was copied from @Wikipedia. OK, but it is still copyright breakage if you then copy it back.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry there must have been a miscommunication, I'm saying that I wrote the Wikipedia article myself, using my own words, and then at some point later The Ladders copied it onto their website. So I never copied anything back, there was never any copyright breakage, I promise, please give me a chance to show proof by restoring the page and giving me like a week to show proof The Ladders copies many pages straight from Wikipedia regularly and should not be considered a primary source. Supremedemency (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also the user Onel5969 who originally marked it for speedy deletion is not giving me a chance to show proof they made a mistake (and I do have proof), they responded to my last talk message saying "Nope. Go away. Onel5969 TT me 20:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)" which is quite concerning, is there a way I can get in contact with you or another administrator to prove my case and show that this editor Onel5969 is being careless? Thanks. Supremedemency (talk) 20:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. you had not made it clear that the original article was created by you. This means that possibly ladders.com may be in violation of copyright, but you are not. I will restore the article. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Ladders.com has since updated their page to remove the version copied from Wikipedia, so can the speedy deletion be removed?Supremedemency (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tag is gone. Obviously I will make no comment on the comments applied to the article page.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nijat Rahimov (actor)

Hello, Anthony,

I saw you were active and I'm hoping you can render a verdict on this article. I PROD'd it last week and so I can't act on it. It looks like the PROD tag was removed by a sockpuppet of the page creator who was very active on articles about Azerbaijan personalities. So, either that tag removal has to be decided to be invalid because it was from a blocked sockpuppet and the article deleted or the PROD tag needs to be removed. Thanks for any help you can offer. I hope you have a pleasant holiday! Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A small thanks

A glass of champagne
Hi! You recently deleted some categories I nominated, and just wanted to thank you for spending your new year's doing the thank-less job of admin-ing. Hope you're getting some good holidays' rest and feel intrinsically rewarded by the work you do here. Cheers. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 23:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Question about soft redirects and WP:R2

Thanks for responding to the CSD on French proverbs. I just wanted clarification on something regarding WP:Soft redirects. Is any soft redirect to another Wiki project from Wikipedia mainspace eligible for WP:R2? I noticed that there's the category Category:Redirects to Wikiquote which has several pages in mainspace similar to French proverbs, soft redirects to the corresponding Wikiquote page (e.g. Armenian proverbs). Could all of them be deleted? Thought I'd ask before tagging them all. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft deleted because created by banned or blocked user

Hi, I am Itcouldbepossible, also known as ICBP. Recently you deleted Draft:Lokkhi Kakima Superstar, as it was created by a sockpuppet of User:Cambria Math. But the problem is that the show will start soon, and deleting such an article just because it was created by a banned user is meaningless. And subsequently I also made edits and improved the draft because it was an upcoming show. Please share your views in this matter. Regards. Yours sincerely ItcouldbepossibleTalk 07:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in my view del;etion of articles created by blocked or banned editors is mandatory, and I do not accept your view that the deletion is meaningless. Any lesser approach negates the whole concept of sockpuppetry prevention. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But according to WP:G5, it says This applies to pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, and that have no substantial edits by others. But the thing is that I had already made my edits there. So then how does it qualify for CSD G5 deletion? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anthony Bradbury, stumbled upon this looking through Itcouldbepossible's contributions, would a refund of the page (to draftspace) be possible to see if anything is worth saving? Thanks in advance :D Justiyaya 03:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Justiyaya That is what I am also saying. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The draft also fails CSD G5. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evie Magazine

I'm the person who created the page. I often come to Wikipedia for information about publications I don't know. There was no page for Evie so I created a simple one. I have no relationship to the magazine.

I've done some reasearch. How about the following:

Evie magazine is an online and printed magazine aimed at young women in the United States.

It says its mission is to "empower, educate, and entertain you with the highest quality content that affirms your femininity, encourages virtue, and offers a more truthful perspective than the biased agenda of other publications".[1]

According to the AllSides democratic media monitoring service, it has a 'Lean Right' bias. As of May 2021, its review found Evie "largely publishes opinion-style pieces that are focused on encouraging traditional values and historic virtues in culture, relationships and lifestyle". AllSides says the magazine typically stands against progressive feminism and is critical of hook-up culture, socialism/communism, the birth control pill and the pharmaceuticals of Western medicine.[2]

Willbown (talk) 13:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this i9nformation. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can I make a page thats this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurogender — Preceding unsigned comment added by FelixAnon (talk • contribs) 20:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can make any page you wish; its survival will depend on its fulfilling all of the standard criteria corrently in fore here. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jorrit Faassen

Hello, you recently deleted the article Jorrit Faassen saying it "does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". The article mentioned in the lead that he is Vladimir Putin's son-in-law, married to Putin's eldest daughter Maria. That clearly indicated his significance. Some might not think that is enough to merit his own Wikipedia article, however that would have been a debate for a deletion discussion, but since it was speedily deleted there was none. Also, per WP:CSD, the information could have been merged into another article – Maria's, where much of the information was before I created Fassen's article. I have been able to restore some information there based on the revision history of Maria's article, but some valuable information is missing (e.g. his D.O.B.) as it was added to his article later and with the page gone I have no way of retrieving that information and source. WP:CSD also says the user nominating a page for deletion should notify the page creator and any major contributors – I am the page creator and I was not notified and thus had no way to contest the deletion as I only learned about it from my watchlist after the fact. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You point out, correctly, that the page nominator is requested to notify the page creator of the nomination. please note that i was the page deleter, not the page nominator, and i suggest that you pursue this problem in the correct direction. More to the point, it is a basic premise in wikipedia that notability is not conferred, so that family members of unarguably notable people are not themselves automatically notable. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Jorrit Faassen

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jorrit Faassen. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Deletion

Hello, just curious as to why you deleted File:Penile vaginal sexual act (top down).jpg for vandalism? It wasn't a vandalism edit. I created a local description of the file with {{Restricted use}} since the original file was tagged as such and the file was just moved at commons. I have also requested the new file name to be added at MediaWiki talk:Bad image list. Terasail[✉️] 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear to me why you felt the need to post this image. You may or may not see the close-up image of an erect penis penetrating a vagina as pornographic, but many would. I while I know that wikipedia is not censored, and agree with this policy, the posting of gratuitous pornography is in my view not in the best interests of the encyclopedia.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't post it and it isn't hosted on wikipedia so any notability concerns are not relevant here. I only requested it moved as it had a duplicate name. And then attempted to tag it as a blacklisted image. The tag should remain, I don't see any need for the image but there is no policy to delete it so its beyond the scope. The edit wasn't vandalism in anysense and so I struggle to see why it was CSD'd and I request that you restore it. Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 17:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Further note. I am happy to discuss my reasoning further (here, at WP:AN, WP:DRV, ect...) but I have decided that I am going to personally recreate this page with {{Restricted use}}. This is for proper categorisation of the file along with notifiying users on why they are incapable of adding it to pages. I am not taking this action to avoid WP:Deletion review however in the spirit of WP:Ignore all rules the CSD was invalid (in my opinion) and sitting here or another discussion board discussing undeleting the page seems pointless to me at this time. Terasail[✉️] 20:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteenth Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Sixteenth Anniversary on Wikipedia!

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Big Green Egg

A few weeks ago you deleted an article about the Big Green Egg - link. Can you restore this article to my user space so I can improve it? It obviously passes GNG and deserves a stand alone article, and I would like a chance to remove the reasons for why it was tagged with G11. I think the G11 justification was not met here, but I won't belabor that point. Mr Ernie (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has already been re-created, albeit in draft form. I do think that G!! applied, but will not apply any tags to it. Whether it survives as a draft to make it into article will be for other editors/admins to decide. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

CSD

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that a page you deleted here was just re-instated by the particular user. I tagged it again just in case. Thanks! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 14:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, it just got deleted again. Sorry to clutter your talk page! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 14:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa of Jesus, Child

Well done on removing the Teresa of Jesus, Child hoax. Even though the creator admitted that the article was in error, I think we should archive this at the list of hoaxes. It’s staggering that this had lasted since 2010. 00sClassicGamerFan (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Coandumirim

Please restore Talk:Coandumirim. I wanted to reply to the IP. I created the stub Coendou speratus after I saw the IP's post, and redirected Coandumirim to the stub prior to your deletion. I was posting a reply to the IP when you deleted. Pikavoom Talk 12:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. A talk page without an associated article page (which must be created first) canot exist here, whatever its content. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I created the page, a redirect, a minute before you deleted the talk page. At the time you deleted the talk page, the G8 deletion tag was no longer valid as there was an associated page. Pikavoom Talk 13:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me. Why can't I have a User page?

Honest request for help. I'd like to have a user page. My previous one was deleted. I recreated it with what I thought were only references to WP-related material. I see now that it has been deleted again. Why can't I have a WP User page with my WP history of barnstars and donations and other WP-related material on it?

XKV8R (talk) 14:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amineyess

Hello, I wish to recover my user page which seems to me to respect all the criteria of Wikipedia, I would like to inform you that the French and Arabic version of my account is active without any problem, also, I want to inform that I have specified on my user page my function and also my main passions that I intervene to contribute to wikipedia However, if there is information to add or remove, please let me know so that I can make the necessary changes.@Amineyess Amineyess (talk) 08:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With the deepest respect, I have to say that you are incorrectin your interpretation of wikipedia policies, at least as regards userpages. I have reviewed your page; you mention linkedIn which is not relevant here, and some other interests, but you make no mention of your hopes, expexctations, experinces. etc. as they relate to your wikipedia editing, and this is what the userpage is intended to be used for. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thank you for pointing out what the problem is on my user page, now I can update it by deleting the Linkedin link and adding another center of interest that aspires me to contribute on wikipedia. did I just mention is enough to get my user page back ? Amineyess (talk) 07:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Muslim Mojahedin

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Muslim Mojahedin. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

readded Valereee
removed Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony

Can you tell me why you deleted the AxySnake page? Please restore the article so it should have to fix some grammar. Fakemates (talk) 22:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find this article. Please tell me when you created it, and under exactly what title. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony, the title was actually called "AxySnake". It's a game made by Axysoft. I created this article and then got deleted. I don't know why would they do this. It was my favorite childhood game. Will you just restore it now? Fakemates (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not every game is automatically notable, and neither is every software company. This game is, in my opinion, not notable in Wikipedia terms, and the company (which does not have a wikipedia article) is similarly not notable.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should I ask other Wikipedia user that can help me to create the article? Fakemates (talk) 16:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is up to you; and you may find an editor who disagrees with me. But i would suggest that no editor will help you to create an article about a non-notable subject. But feel free to ask. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Draft: Princess Omowunmi Agunbiade

Good wishes, writing to you because I was to create the draft page of a deleted Draft (Princess Omowunmi Agunbiade). It was deleted due to reviews of unambiguous advertising, and I would like to rewrite and develop the article further. Caramel2155 (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead; just avoid the error created by the last editor, which led to the article's deletion.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my Draft:Pasha Travel?

I'm not sure why you think this page is promotional.

Could you at least restore the draft so that I can edit further? I don't have any backup files. Vorosvictor (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can place it in your talk page. But please be aware that as it stands t reads like an advertisement and, as such. is not acceptable. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ https://www.eviemagazine.com/about
  2. ^ https://www.allsides.com/news-source/evie-magazine-media-bias
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony_Bradbury&oldid=1103395871"