Editing Godwin's law's law (section)

==Examples of usage==
:“[[Bush|Bush’s]] [[Middle Eastern]] policies are bad. Bush is like Hitler!”
:“Godwin’s Law! Argument invalid LOL!”
:“Godwin’s Law's Law! Just because you compared something to Godwin’s Law doesn’t make it invalid! Therefore Bush is like Hitler.”



:“The [[admin]]s deleted my [[article]]. This is censorship! Admins are like Hitler!”
:“Godwin’s Law! Argument invalid LOL!”
:“Godwin’s Law's Law! Just because you compared something to Godwin’s Law doesn’t make it invalid! Therefore admins are like Hitler.”



[[File:kitty.gif|thumb|230px|You see, if you like Hello Kitty, you're like Hitler too.]]
:“Hitler supported [[kitten huffing]] too! Kitten huffers are like Hitler!”
:“Godwin’s Law! Argument invalid LOL!”
:“Godwin’s Law's Law! Just because you compared something to Godwin’s Law doesn’t make it invalid! Therefore kitten huffers are like Hitler.”
:“Godwin’s Law's Law's Law! Just because you compared something to Godwin’s Law's Law doesn’t make it invalid! Therefore you argument was invalid!”
:“Godwin’s Law's Law's Law's Law! Just because you compared something to the Godwin’s Law's Law's Law doesn’t make it invalid! Therefore your argument that my argument was invalid, was invalid!”


The last argument may go on and on. This happens rarely, but when it does, it is considered a small setback of Godwin’s Law's Law - that the law can be used against the person who cited it. In such a situation, the side with the most patience, perseverance, [[stupid]]ity and obnoxiousness wins in the end. Therefore the method is used most widely in [[Wikipedia]]. In real [[life]], however, people generally win after they cite the Inverted Godwin's Law. These people are known as [[winners]], and their opponents will be known as [[losers]] who support [[genocide]], [[ethnic cleansing]], [[socialism]], [[communism]], [[fascism]] and funny [[mustache]] growth.