Wiktionary:Votes/2012-04/Languages with limited documentation
Languages with limited online documentation
- Voting on: Three changes on the the criteria for inclusion page and the creation of one sub-page to address the difficulties in finding adequate source material to attest languages with limited documentation available online. Also, minor changes of "usage" to "use" for consistency and deletion of one instance of the word "or."
At Wiktionary:CFI#Attestation, replacement of (changes are shown in boldface):
|
with
|
Below that section, between the subsections "Conveying meaning" and "Independent," insertion of the following section (blue text indicates a hyperlink to be added):
Number of citationsIn general, three citations in which a term is used are the minimum number for inclusion in Wiktionary. For terms in extinct languages, one use in a contemporaneous source is the minimum. For languages with limited online documentation, only one use or mention is adequate, subject to the following requirements:
|
In the "Natural Languages" section on the CFI page, the addition of the following section (hyperlinked from the section above):
Languages with limited online documentation
The following are considered to be languages with limited online documentation:
|
The creation of a page at Wiktionary:CFI/Languages with limited online documentation with the following text (hyperlinked from "other languages with limited online documentation" above and the blue text "languages with limited online documentation" below hyperlinked back to the added section above):
Other languages with limited online documentation
The following are considered to be other languages with limited online documentation as provided on the Criteria for inclusion page (living languages unless specified otherwise):
This page may be modified through general consensus. To make a request to add or exclude a language, go to the Beer Parlour and click the "+" tab at top to input your request. |
Examples of relevant languages and words
Use in extinct languages would not be affected. The following endangered languages would be allowed under this proposal. Items 1 and 2 are courtesy of Metaknowledge, item 3 is courtesy of Ungoliant, and item 4 is courtesy of Xavier Barker:
- Krio: famble
- Bislama: ovaspen
2008, Miriam Meyerhoff, Social lives in language--sociolinguistics and multilingual speech[2] (overall work in English), →ISBN, page 344:
Bang i wantem mi faen from mi ovaspen.
- (please add an English translation of this quotation)
- Category:Hunsrik nouns
- Nauru Pacific Pidgin - a language in Nauru with about 8000 people documented in only one source
- Lushootseed: ʔux̌áx̌ƛʼil
- 1996 — ed. by Crisca Bierwert, Lushootseed Texts, pp. 124-125: not on Google at all or in the Lushootseed Dictionary by Dawn Bates, Thom Hess and Vi Hilbert
- ʔux̌áx̌ƛʼil - They screeched.
- Ditidaht: t’abuuk’ʷ
- 1987 — Allis Pakki Chipps-Sawyer, Standing on the Edge of Yesterday: A Dilemma of Oral Knowledge Survival in a West Coast Family [[3]], p. 106 (PDF page 118): not on Google at all even though the PDF is on the Internet
- t’abuuk’ʷ - Kingfisher
- Makah: ƛ̓ikatšiƛ
- 2002, Matthew Davidson, Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) Grammar, page 430
- ƛ̓ikatšiƛ - start walking
The following languages are not endangered but have limited written documentation. Items 1 to 3 are courtesy of Metaknowledge and item 4 is courtesy of Christopher Weedall:
- Fiji Hindi: Μετάknowledge notes that the terms for Fiji Hindi already on Wiktionary would not likely pass the CFI
- Tok Pisin: kaukau
1995, John Verhaar, Toward a reference grammar of Tok Pisin: an experiment in corpus linguistics[4] (overall work in English), →ISBN, page 433:
Mekim olsem pinis, orait tupela i planim taro na banana, na kumu, painap, kon, tomato, na kaukau tu.
- (please add an English translation of this quotation)
- Pijin: sios
1988, Geoffrey Miles White, Bikfala faet: olketa Solomon Aelanda rimembarem Wol Wo Tu[5], page 75:
Bihaen hemi finisim skul blong hem, hemi go minista long sios long ples blong hem long 'Areo.
- (please add an English translation of this quotation)
- Zarma - a thesis on Zarma is expected in the near future by Christopher Weedall
- Vote starts: 00:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Vote created: BenjaminBarrett12 (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Discussion:
- WT:Beer_parlour#A_new_vote_for_languages_with_limited_documentation
- User talk:BenjaminBarrett12
- Wiktionary talk:Votes/2012-04/Languages with limited documentation - includes a background and further information
- Relevant past votes
- Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-12/Attestation_criteria - a proposed point system for judging attestation
- Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2010-12/Attestation_of_extinct_languages - includes discussion of defining an extinct language, usage vs. mention, and the term contemporaneous (renamed from Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation_of_extinct_languages)
- Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation_of_extinct_languages_2
- Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation_of_extinct_languages_3
- Wiktionary:Votes/2012-03/CFI_for_Endangered_Languages - the immediate predecessor to this proposal
- Relevant past discussions
- Wiktionary:Beer_parlour_archive/2010/November#Wiktionary:About_Ancient_Greek.23Attestation - same as "Ancient Greek discussion" link above
- Wiktionary:Beer_parlour#CFI_for_endangered_languages
- Wiktionary:Beer_parlour_archive/2007/November#Endangered_and_Extinct_language_categories
- Wiktionary:Beer_parlour#Requesting_input_for_extinct_and_other_sparsely_documented_languages
- Wiktionary:Beer_parlour#CFI_for_endangered_languages
- Requests for languages with limited documentation
Support
- Support BB12 (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 02:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Jcwf 02:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 03:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Vahag (talk) 10:55, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Anatoli (обсудить) 01:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen (Talk) 11:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Support Istafe (talk) 14:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support.—msh210℠ (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose Dan Polansky (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Istafe (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- You realize you can't vote twice, right? You need to choose one, support or oppose. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 15:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Abstain
- Abstain Probably a good proposal, but: tl;dr. -- Liliana • 13:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Decision
Vote passes 9-1-1. I will modify CFI accordingly. Please note that I have stricken both of Istafe's votes, as it is not allowed to vote twice. In any case, his/her vote did not affect the outcome. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)