Yanomaman, also as Yanomam, Yanomáman, Yamomámi, and Yanomamana (also Shamatari, Shirianan), is a family of languages spoken by about 20,000 Yanomami people in southern Venezuela and northwestern Brazil (Roraima, Amazonas).

Yanomaman
EthnicityYąnomamö
Geographic
distribution
Amazon
Linguistic classificationOne of the world's primary language families
Language codes
Glottologyano1268
Yanomaman languages location
  Ninam

Subdivision

edit
 
Distribution of the Yanomaman languages in South America

Ferreira et al. (2019)

edit

Ferreira, Machado & Senra (2019) divide the Yanomaman family into two branches, with six languages in total.[1][2]

  • Yanomaman
    • Ninam-Yanomam-Yaroamë
      • Nimam
        • Ninam (also known as Yanami, Yanami-Ninami) - 900 speakers in Venezuela and Brazil
      • Yanomam-Yaroamë
        • Yanomám (also known as Waiká) - 6,000 speakers mainly in Venezuela
        • Yanomamö (also known as Yanomame, Yanomami) - 20,000 speakers mainly in Brazil
        • Yaroamë (also known as Jawari) - 400 speakers in Brazil
        • Yãnoma - 178 speakers in Brazil
    • Sanumá
      • Sanumá (also known as Tsanuma, Sanima) - 5,100 speakers mainly in Venezuela

Sanumá is the most lexically distinct. Yanomamö has the most speakers (20,000), while Yãnoma has the fewest (178).

Jolkesky (2016)

edit

Internal classification by Jolkesky (2016):[3]

(† = extinct)

Genetic relations

edit

Yanomaman is usually not connected with any other language family. Joseph Greenberg has suggested a relationship between Yanomaman and Macro-Chibchan. Migliazza (1985) has suggested a connection with Panoan and Chibchan. Neither proposal is widely accepted.[4]

Language contact

edit

Jolkesky (2016) notes that there are lexical similarities with the Irantxe, Taruma, Katukina-Katawixi, Puinave-Kak, Tupi, Arawa, Guahibo, and Jivaro language families due to contact.[3]

Name

edit

Yanomami is not what the Yanomami call themselves and is instead a word in their language meaning "man" or "human being". The American anthropologist Napoleon Chagnon adopted this term with the transcription Ya̧nomamö to use as an exonym to refer to the culture and, by extension, the people. The word is pronounced with nasalisation of all the vowels. As the phoneme indicated by the spelling 'ö' does not occur in English, variations in spelling and pronunciation of the name have developed, with Yanomami, Yanomamö, Ya̧nomamö, and Yanomama all being used. Some anthropologists have used the spelling Yanomamɨ to indicate the vowel [ɨ],[citation needed] but because many presses and typesetters eliminate the diacritical marks, the pronunciation /i/ and spelling of the name with ⟨i⟩ has emerged.

Characteristics

edit

Phonology

edit

Yanomaman languages have a phonological distinction between oral and nasal vowels. There are seven basic vowel qualities: /a e i o u ɨ ə/, which can occur as oral or nasal sounds.[5]

Yanomaman vowels
Front Central Back
Oral Nasal Oral Nasal Oral Nasal
Close i ĩ ɨ ⟨y⟩ or ⟨ö⟩ ɨ̃ ⟨ỹ⟩ u ũ
Mid e ə ⟨ë⟩ o õ
Open a ã

In the table above, the practical orthography is shown in angle brackets below the phoneme, if different.

The Yanomaman languages present extensive nasal harmony. When in Yanomaman words, a vowel is phonetically nasalized, all vowels that follow within the same word are also nasalized. The consonants of Yanomama are shown in the table below:[5]

Labial Alveolar Post-
alveolar
Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal m n
Stop p t k ʔ
Fricative s ʃ j h
Approximant w l

Syntax

edit

Yanomaman languages are SOV, suffixing, predominantly head-marking with elements of dependent-marking. Its typology is highly polysynthetic. Adjectival concepts are expressed by means of stative verbs, there are no true adjectives. Adjectival stative verbs follow their noun.

There are five demonstratives which have to be chosen according to distance from speaker and hearer and also according to visibility, a feature shared by many native Brazilian languages such as Tupian ones including Old Tupi. Demonstratives, numerals, classifiers and quantifiers precede the head noun.

There is a distinction between alienable and inalienable possession, again a common areal feature, and a rich system of verbal classifiers, almost a hundred, they are obligatory and appear just before the verb root. The distinction between inclusive and exclusive 1st person plural, a feature shared by most Native American languages, has been lost in Yanam and Yanomam dialects, but retained in the others.

Yanomami morphosyntactic alignment is ergative–absolutive, which means that the subject of an intransitive verb is marked the same way as the object of a transitive verb, while the subject of a transitive verb is marked differently. The ergative case marker is -ny. The verb agrees with both subject and object.

Evidentiality in the Yanomami dialect is marked on the verb and has four levels: eyewitness, deduced, reported, and assumed. Other dialects have fewer levels.

The object of the verb can be incorporated into it, especially if it not in focus:

Non-incorporated:

kamijə-ny

1sg-ERG

sipara

axe

ja-puhi-i

1sg-want-DYN

kamijə-ny sipara ja-puhi-i

1sg-ERG axe 1sg-want-DYN

'I want an/the axe'

Incorporated:

kamijə-ny

1sg-ERG

ja-sipara-puhi-i

1sg-axe-want-DYN

kamijə-ny ja-sipara-puhi-i

1sg-ERG 1sg-axe-want-DYN

'I want [it], the axe'

Relative clauses are formed by adding a relativizing ('REL' below) suffix to the verb:

wãro-n

man-ERG

shama

tapir

shyra-wei

kill-REL

ware-ma

eat-COMPL

wãro-n shama shyra-wei ware-ma

man-ERG tapir kill-REL eat-COMPL

'the man who killed the tapir ate it'

Sanuma dialect also has a relative pronoun ĩ.

Vocabulary

edit

Loukotka (1968) lists the following basic vocabulary items for Yanomaman language varieties.[6]

gloss Shirianá Parimiteri Sanemá Pubmatari Waica Karime Paucosa Surára
one kauitxamhét chaamí muliman mahón
two tasíma polakabí botokaki porakabö
three tasimaimhét hiːriːpólagʔa prukatabö
head bel-éhe pil-héawan pi-hé pei-hé pei-yáhe ne-umgipe peːiua-hé
ear beli-yaméke pilmórokwiːn pi-xinkawán yímikek pei-yameke peːiua-niumekakeː
tooth beli-uáke pil-nákwan pi-nakuán pei-uák pei-uáke ne-parike peːiua-uáke
man horóme waro wandzyé wanodá ũálõ uáru uau uhanó
water mãepe madzyu maduú mãõ mahu maú maú
fire oáke kwárogʔe kuadák koawáke oáke uauká kauːwaká
stone mamáke muadamiːn máma mama
sun belipshí pilmórokwiːn pilmoró motóka motúka mitukaki peniboːínshi
manioc nazygóke naasʔís nashita makóke
jaguar déhe póleawan poʔlé íla téhe ührá

References

edit
  1. ^ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Yanomaman languages". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
  2. ^ Ferreira, Helder Perri; Machado, Ana Maria Antunes; Senra, Estevão Benfica (2019). Instituto Socioambiental; Hutukara Associação Yanomami (eds.). As línguas yanomami no Brasil: Diversidade e vitalidade (PDF). São Paulo. ISBN 978-85-8226-076-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-10-15.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ a b Jolkesky, Marcelo Pinho de Valhery (October 2017) [February 2016]. Estudo arqueo-ecolinguístico das terras tropicais sul-americanas (PDF) (Ph.D. thesis) (in Portuguese) (2nd ed.). University of Brasília.
  4. ^ Campbell, Lyle (2012). "Classification of the indigenous languages of South America". In Grondona, Verónica; Campbell, Lyle (eds.). The Indigenous Languages of South America. The World of Linguistics. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 59–166. ISBN 978-3-11-025513-3.
  5. ^ a b Ferreira, Helder Perri (2017). Yanomama Clause Structure (PDF). Utrecht: LOT. ISBN 978-94-6093-258-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-04-18.
  6. ^ Loukotka, Čestmír (1968). Classification of South American Indian languages. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.

Bibliography

edit
  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.; Dixon, R.M.W. (1999). The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521570213.
  • Campbell, Lyle (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. (1960). "General classification of Central and South American languages". In Wallace, A. (ed.). Men and cultures: Fifth international congress of anthropological and ethnological sciences (1956). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 791–794.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. (1987). Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Kaufman, Terrence (1990). "Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more". In Payne, D. L. (ed.). Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 13–67. ISBN 0-292-70414-3..
  • Kaufman, Terrence (1994). "The native languages of South America". In Mosley, C.; Asher, R. E. (eds.). Atlas of the world's languages. London: Routledge. pp. 46–76.
  • Mattei-Müller, M (2007). Lengua y cultura yanomami: diccionario ilustrado yanomami-español, español-yanomami. Caracas: CONAC.
  • Migliazza, E. C. (1972). Yanomama grammar and intelligibility (PhD thesis). Indiana University.
  • Migliazza, Ernest C. (1985). "Languages of the Orinoco-Amazon region: Current status". In Manelis Klein, H. E.; Stark, L. R. (eds.). South American Indian languages: Retrospect and prospect. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 17–139.
  • Migliazza, Ernest C.; Campbell, Lyle (1988). Panorama general de las lenguas indígenas en América. Historia general de América. Vol. 10. Caracas: Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia.

Dictionaries

edit
  • Müller, Marie-Claude Mattei. (2007) Diccionario ilustrado yanomami-español / español-yanomami. Caracas: Epsilon Libros. 782pp.
edit