Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mainspace article and only two links for the subject. Fails navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The banners associated with the education program have been deleted or turned into subst-only templates. We don't need a specific banner to hold them any more. Any special uses can use Template:Banner holder if necessary. Izno (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is more or less the predecessor to the Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment, since turned into a subst-only template. I think a subst and delete (of the same character, so convert to text and then subst) would be appropriate here for the same reasons the newer template was turned into a substed template. Izno (talk) 20:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template. Suggest removal entirely. If something like this is generally necessary, Template:Banner holder is available. Izno (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

South Africa S-line templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Metrorail Eastern Cape, Module:Adjacent stations/Metrorail KwaZulu-Natal, Module:Adjacent stations/Premier Classe, and Module:Adjacent stations/Shosholoza Meyl Frietjes (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused station template. Gonnym (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Lucknow Metro. Gonnym (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template of a simple table. Should be subst to article and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 09:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, probably replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/SNCF. Gonnym (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I suggested a few weeks ago, I don't think this template needs to exist. It has 2 uses, and its use case doesn't fit the styling. These are not disambiguation pages nor even remotely similar to disambiguation pages. Broad concept articles exist all over the wiki and I think no-one would add this to those. Izno (talk) 09:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/SNCF. Gonnym (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all uses as all uses were either for a single Template:DYK-portal or had only deleted portals linked. For any other necessary uses, Template:Banner holder exists. Izno (talk) 08:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use copy of Template:Talk header. Izno (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all uses as all uses were either for a single Template:Article-portal or had only deleted portals linked. For any other necessary uses, Template:Banner holder exists. Izno (talk) 06:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, except for a couple that are used in a (now no longer applicable) demonstration table on a project page. All other relevant pages have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Tyne and Wear Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/London River Services. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. fine with this, they're redundant now. Cnbrb (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 04:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what this is for. Unused. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An old talk page relic which is replaced by the standard Template:Talk header. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused S-line template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).