Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 30

< January 29	January 31 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MBTI table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Needless single-use convenience template for a small table SFB 19:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; unused. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 03:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of townships in Illinois by county

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of townships in Illinois by county (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused convenience template SFB 19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; unused. I don't understand what it's for anyhow. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 03:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ATP Race Points Distribution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ATP Race Points Distribution (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Needless convenience template for a small table SFB 18:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; unused. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 03:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article icon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to User:MorbidEntree/temps/Article icon Primefac (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template unused in main space and created by inactive user SFB 18:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; there's already Template:Icon. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 02:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy just move it back to User:MorbidEntree/temps/Article icon so their user page isn't broken. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Terumasa Hino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Terumasa Hino (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are no current links to any individual articles. Dan arndt (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it does not navigate anywhere. Could always be recreated if articles are created. MarnetteD|Talk 17:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No links, so no navigational use. Hog Farm (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 02:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kobe Bryant sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kobe Bryant sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Newly created sidebar is largely duplicated by the existing navbox Template:Kobe Bryant. Doesn't meet guideline WP:SIDEBAR: The collection of articles in a sidebar template should be fairly tightly related, and the template should meet most or all of the preceding guidelines. At the very least, do not have both a sidebar and a navbox. —Bagumba (talk) 08:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TFD#REASONS#2. Additionally Sidebars clutter the article while the navbox are out of the way. --Gonnym (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant as we already have a Kobe navbox. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 12:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. MarnetteD|Talk 17:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant; per others. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 05:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's useful.Snowboard0001 (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The template is there to look back at his life and achievements. -Mardus /talk 08:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it the reference links are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaseyPlace (talk • contribs) 10:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete its a template fork, or in general speak: mostly a duplication of template:Kobe Bryant. Also per Gonnym. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to existing template. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - redundant to the navboxes. Rikster2 (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's obtrusive (infoboxes and sidebars never look good one after another) and has minimal value considering it is already redundant with the navboxes. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 14:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --IndexAccount (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Katie Waissel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Katie Waissel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NAV-WITHIN. There are only two items and they are already linked in the articles in question. I don't see the potential for growth. MarnetteD|Talk 02:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 02:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just not needed. ~ HAL 333 03:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe drafts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe drafts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox for draft articles; the creator seems to misunderstand what drafts are for and how they're supposed to work. Trivialist (talk) 00:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Since there are so many drafts for upcoming Marvel Cinematic Universe films and TV series (etc.), it's helpful to be able to easily access and navigate these drafts. It's not doing any harm by existing. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have very clear knowledge of what drafts are, thanks. As Paintspot said and I said in my creation edit summary, the navbox is to aid in access and navigating between all of the draft articles. There is also no guideline or policy against having a navbox solely for draft article. This point is made clear in documentation and in the coding to produce an error message, should any user attempt to place it outside the draft space. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; a good idea and quite useful for navigation. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 05:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the others, as it helps to navigate specific Marvel film drafts. Cardei012597 (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We have navigational templates for WikiProjects and other spaces. I know of no rule that would forbid this for drafts. BD2412 T 06:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. ~ HAL 333 03:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Navboxes are for navigation and since there are so many of these drafts having a navbox is helpful.★Trekker (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).