Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 16

March 16

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've already redirected most of the other related articles that I created to the Sarah Fimm article, which I'm hoping to expand so that it at least can stay.--Shaneymike (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There is NPASR because of the lack of comment from the previous advocates for deletion following a change in content. Primefac (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naboxes with ensemble casts like this do not perform a useful navigational function. I don't really think that anyone would want to navigate between, say, Billy Magnussen and Mary J. Blige in this manner. This kind of information belongs in an article, not a navbox. I'm nominating these as a test case, as there are many others like this, to gauge opinion on whether navboxes of this nature should be kept. --woodensuperman 10:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a strong consensus to at the very least remove the cast members but leave the films. The template has been updated to reflect this, so further discussion should centre on whether these templates should exist full stop. Pinging previous participants for further input: @Philafrenzy, MarnetteD, Randy Kryn, and TonyTheTiger:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Unnecessary navigation, only links to one other article. (non-admin closure) Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Useless. Links one article. --woodensuperman 15:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 23. (non-admin closure) Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).