Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TRUN221/Archive
TRUN221
- TRUN221 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
23 April 2011
edit- Suspected sockpuppets
- TRUN223 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Opsex2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
- Happysailor (Talk) 13:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
editAccused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit- Administrator note Just in case it wasn't clear what's going on here due to an entire lack of evidence given in the initial report, these editors have created 45 tha feva and similar non-notable articles. I've blocked the two socks, but have left the master alone as it hasn't been used recently. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
09 May 2011
edit- Suspected sockpuppets
- Cmar367 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Previous archived case states, "these editors have created 45 tha feva and similar non-notable articles". The article 45 the feva (the instead of tha) has just been created by a new user Cmar367. Bgwhite (talk) 06:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
editAccused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
editConfirmed the following are the same:
- Pello134 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TRUN221 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TRUN224 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TRUN223 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Louis334 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Opsex2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MARC323 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Cmar367 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- IP blocked TNXMan 11:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Awaiting administrative action Finish the blocking please, reblock if not sock related. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)